Cases

Case: 18-30824 Document: 00515237878 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-30824 December 16, 2019

Affirmed in Part, and Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction in Part, and Memorandum Opinion filed April 7, 2009 Affirmed in Part, and Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction in Part, and Memorandum Opinion filed April 7, 2009. In

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Mark S. Williams (“Williams”), Gerald Doucette, Jr. (“Doucette”), and Juan Villafane (“Villafane”) claim they were subjected to sexual abuse, harassment, and threatening conduct at the Drapelick Center, a residential re-entry work-release program located in Bloomfield Connecticut. Their Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 13), which

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00392-CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.T., A CHILD ---------- FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 323-98700J-13 ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

Hopkins, J. In a joint trial on the issue of liability only, the plaintiffs in Action No. 1 in these consolidated actions, Charles F. Hart, Jr., and Patricia Hart, have recovered a judgment against the defendant therein, Charles Scribner. The main question is whether the instructions of the trial court concerning the doctrines of rescue and emergency were adequately charged to the jury under the circumstances of the case. We conc

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to explore the limits of a trial judge’s authority to remove a significant piece of evidence from a jury’s consideration based upon his belief that the evidence lacks persuasive force. 1 We conclude that, in the circumstances of this

665 F.Supp. 1147 (1987) NORTHEAST WOMEN'S CENTER, INC. v. Michael McMONAGLE, Dennis Sadler, Deborah Baker, Thomas Herlihy, Anne Knorr, Robert Moran, Joseph P. Wall, Roland Markum, Howard Walton, Henry Tenaglio, Stephanie Morello, Annemarie Breen, Ellen Jones, Susan Silcox, Paul C. Armes, Walter G. Gies, John J. O'Brien, Patricia Walton, Kathy Long, Helen Gaydos, Donna Andracavage, Juan Guerra, Margaret Caponi, Mary Bryne, Linda Corbett, Thomas Mc

AFFIRMED as MODIFIED and Opinion Filed April 15, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01121-CV CLARKE BARCUS, C-2 IT RENTAL, INC., 440 EQUIPMENT, LLC AND CYRUS BARCUS, Appellants V. SARAH SCHARBAUER, Appellee On

*1185Contents Glossary.1186 Background.1187 I. Asbestos Claims Against NGC and NGC’s Insurance Policies.1187 A. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Claims.1187 B. NGC’s Insurance Program.1187 C. The ACF and CCR Claims-Handling Facilities .1188 D. NGC’s

757 So.2d 1163 (2000) William M. BLEIER v. WELLINGTON SEARS COMPANY. 1971121. Supreme Court of Alabama. January 21, 2000. *1165 Timothy L. Dillard, Stevan K. Goozée, and Lawrence T. King of Dillard, Goozée & King, Birmingham, for appellant. Charles A. Powell III, David W. Proctor, and J. Trent Scofield of Johnston, Bar

767 P.2d 941 (1989) Sidney SEFTEL, Theresa Seftel, and Michael Landes, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CAPITAL CITY BANK, a Utah corporation, Defendant and Respondent. CAPITAL CITY BANK, a Utah corporation, Counterclaimant, v. Sidney SEFTEL, Theresa Seftel, Michael Landes, Utah State Tax Commission, Crossroads Plaza Associates, a Utah joint venture and general partnership, Young Electric Sign Company, a Utah corporation, and Olympus Hil

APPEL, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I. Introduction. I concur in part and dissent in part. I concur in the majority's conclusion that a whistleblower claim is available to Hedlund under Walsh v. Wahlert , 913 N.W.2d 517

298 F.Supp.2d 619 (2003) Cindy A. PILON, Plaintiff, v. SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY and Richard P. Thompson, Defendants. No. 03-100006-BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. December 22, 2003. *620 *621 Glen N. Lenhoff, Law Office of Glen N. Lenhoff, Flint, MI,

785 F.Supp. 467 (1992) Frank PAGANUCCI, Mort Adler, Augustine Aloia, Louis C. Amen, Linda M. Anderson, Alfonso Andosca, Salvatore Ardizzone, Robert Arluck, Michael Armstrong, Joseph Averso, Desmond P. Bailey, S. Balestrieri, James W. Bard, Daniel Barker, Kevin Barry, Joseph Battaglia, Nicholas N. Battista, Anthony H. Benvenuto, Ken Bergman, Frank Bergstol, Thomas P. Blake, Francis Bostelman, Joseph O. Brousseau, Michael F. Bruno, Joseph Buffolino, Kevin

CERCONE, President Judge: The Commonwealth brings the instant appeal from the trial court’s order granting of appellee’s demurrer to the charge of homicide by vehicle, Motor Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3732 (1977).1 Ms. Barone filed a cross-appeal challenging an earlier order of court dismissing various of her earlier petitions and motions attacking the constitutionality of this statute. Albeit for

[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi

540 F.Supp. 870 (1982) Doris E. ALTAMURO, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph S. Altamuro, Deceased v. The MILNER HOTEL, INC. and City of Philadelphia. Civ. A. No. 79-2936. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. March 24, 1982. *871 Ronald Ervais, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. George J. Lavin, Jr.

725 So.2d 960 (1998) DUNLOP TIRE CORPORATION v. Mickey ALLEN. 1941845. Supreme Court of Alabama. October 2, 1998. Rehearing Denied November 20, 1998. *961 D. Edward Starnes III and Jeffrey T. Kelly of Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne, P.C., Huntsville, for appellant. Jimmy Alexander and Robert M. Baker of Al

18-2454-cv (L) People of the State of New York v. Griepp 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 ____________________ 5 6 August Term, 2019 7 8 (Argued: September 26, 2019 Decided: March 10, 2021) 9 10 Docket Nos. 18-2454-cv, 18-2623-cv, 18-2627-cv, 18-2630-cv 11 12 13