Cases

OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendant J.H. Miles and Company, Inc.’s motion [Doc. No. 3] to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Also before the Court is Defendant’s motion [Doc. No. 4] seeking to partially dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to F

ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is a Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 148] filed by Defendant Home City Ice Company (“Home City”). For the reasons and under the terms set forth below, the motion is GRANTED. Home City seeks both to limit the scope of discovery, based on relevance to the remaining RICO claim alleged by Plaintiff, and to require Pla

217 F.Supp.2d 1058 (2002) James F. McNULTY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. TASER INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. Richard Bass, Involuntary Plaintiff, v. Taser International Inc., et al., Defendants. No. SACV 01-0395 DOC. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 29, 2002. *1059 *106

OPINION KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Britton Thomas (“Thomas”) brings a putative class action based on a *662statement in a debt collection letter he received (the “Letter”) advising that if Thomas took the option of paying the reported debt by credit card, a $3.00 convenience fee (the “Convenience Fee”) would be added. Tho

157 T.C. No. 10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ANDREW MCNULTY AND DONNA MCNULTY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 1377-19. Filed November 18, 2021. Each P established a self-directed individual retirement account (IRA) under I.R.C. sec. 408 and directed assets held in the IRA to invest in a single-member limited liability company (LLC). P-W was the manager of the LLC

OPINION AND ORDER - GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS, AND GRANTING MARTIN G. MCNULTY’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation’s (“Reddy Ice”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 27), The Home City Ice Company’s (“Home City”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 28), Arctic Glacier Income Fund

875 F.Supp. 121 (1995) Michael CRAFT, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Honorable Michael R. McNULTY, Defendant. No. 94-CV-1335. United States District Court, N.D. New York. January 28, 1995. *122 Michael Craft, Sr., plaintiff pro se. Office of Gen. Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC, for defendant (Thomas J. Spulak,

702 F.Supp.2d 512 (2010) LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, Plaintiff v. Irene THOMAS, Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-3941. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 24, 2010. Brian J. McNulty, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, King of Prussia, PA, for Plaintiff. S. Stacy Mogul, Heiligman and Mogul, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant. <

*756OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises out of a former employment relationship between plaintiff Thomas & Betts Corporation (“T & B”) and defendant Glenn Luzzi. In an action commenced in 2001, T & B claimed that when Luzzi left T & B to work for a competitor, defendant Richards Manufacturing Company (“Richards”), he misappro

*756OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises out of a former employment relationship between plaintiff Thomas & Betts Corporation (“T & B”) and defendant Glenn Luzzi. In an action commenced in 2001, T & B claimed that when Luzzi left T & B to work for a competitor, defendant Richards Manufacturing Company (“Richards”), he misappro

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge TRAXLER joined. WILLIAM W. WILKINS, Chief Judge: Michael Anthony Thomas appeals his conviction for fourth-offense driving while intoxicated (DWI) on a federal reservation in Virginia. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 13 (West 2000) (adopting

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * WADE BRORBY, Circuit Judge. Katherine McNulty appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to her former employer on her claims of retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we AFFIRM. I. Sandoval County, New Mexico

LEE, J., for the court. PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTS ¶ 1. On January 25, 2001, Helen Brum-field called the police to complain that three men, including the appellant, were next door and one was holding a gun. Upon arrival, Officer Rodney Nordstrom saw Lurandall McNulty drop something and kick it under a vehicle. The officer approached McNulty and retrieved a handgun from under the vehicle.

21 Ariz. App. 127 (1973) 516 P.2d 583 Margaret L. BARNETTE, a widow, Appellant, v. James F. McNULTY, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Wilson M. Barnette, Deceased, Appellee. No. 2 CA-CIV 1454. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. December 13, 1973. Rehearing Denied January 10, 1974. Review Denied February 5, 1974.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Senior Judge PHILLIPS and Senior Judge LAY joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: This ease raises questions about the respective roles of Congress and the courts in judging the propriety of surveillance activity involving advancing technologies. Appell

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. A jury found the defendants — Alex Beverly, Betty McNulty, George Brown, and Diane Griffin — guilty of various drug trafficking and/or conspiracy offenses. The defendants appeal their convictions on a *340 multitude of grounds. For the following reasons, we affirm.

PER CURIAM. The United States moved to dismiss the appeal in this 21 U.S.C. § 881 in rem forfeiture action for lack of jurisdiction as to those properties already forfeited and sold pending appeal. Respondents Diane Griffin and Blacon Foods, Inc. (Blacon) allege that such dismissal would be improper given this court’s in personam jurisdict

AMENDED OPINION McNULTY, United States District Judge. The plaintiff, Sylvia Volin, brings this putative class action against the defendant, General Electric Company (“GE”), for damages relating to the allegedly defective design of gas range ovens. The complaint asserts six causes of action, for violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:8-1 et seq.; breach of implied warranties; br

Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge Thomas A. Zummo was a taxicab driver. He brought this pro se lawsuit, alleging that the City of Chicago1 has denied him constitutional rights, violated antitrust laws, and violated various state laws by failing to regulate what a City ordinance calls "Transportation Network Providers" (such as Uber and Lyft) in the same way as taxicabs.

826 F.2d 788 Terrence P. O'DONNELL, Jr., Appellant,v.Sheriff Pat THOMAS; Capt. Dan Williamson; Deputy MarkGriffey; Deputy McNulty; Deputy Mott; DeputyJiff; Deputy Arthur Dudley; DeputyFriis; and Deputy Squire, Appellees. No. 86-1534. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1986.Resubmitted July 16, 1987.Decided