⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Thomas L Hull”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-11-04 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 536; 187 L. Ed. 2d 384; 82 U.S.L.W. 3257; 571 U.S. 999; 2013 WL 5410698; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7961
*537Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006-03-07 · Published · cited 10× · 278 Ga. App. 477; 629 S.E.2d 26; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 743; 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 254
Ellington, Judge. Plaintiff Kace Investments, L.P. (“Kace”) appeals from two orders of the Superior Court of Richmond County. Kace contends the court erred in finding it in civil contempt on February 18, 2005 for failing to comply with prior orders of the court. Kace also contends the court erred in its August 26, 2004 order by allowing defendants/counterclaimants James M. Hull III and Windsor Square, LLC (collectively “Hull
Thomas v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014-02-06 · Published · cited 0× · 325 Ga. App. 682; 754 S.E.2d 661; 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 218; 2014 WL 486391; 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 50
Branch, Judge. In a scuffle that Timothy Thomas started by pointing a loaded gun at Dennis Lopez’s head, Lopez was shot and injured in both hands. Following a trial by jury, Thomas was convicted and sentenced on one count of aggravated assault for pointing the gun at Lopez; two counts of aggravated battery — one for each injury to Lopez’s hands; and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. On appeal, Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004-03-10 · Published · cited 68× · 362 F.3d 725; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 4604; 2004 WL 434630
PER CURIAM: Defendant Thomas McCrimmon challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal following his first trial on charges that he conspired to enlist investors into an illegal Ponzi scheme and conspired to launder the proceeds of that scheme. McCrimmon also appeals his conviction in the second trial on these same charges and, with respect to his se
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-09-28 · Published · cited 12× · 2018 Ohio 4015; 121 N.E.3d 65
Donofrio, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant/cross-appellee, Discovery Oil and Gas, LLC, (Discovery) appeals the judgment of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment on a breach of contract claim by plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant Wildcat Drilling, LLC, (Wildcat). Wildcat appeals the trial court's award of damages. {¶ 2} On December 19, 2014,
State v. Hullpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-05-11 · Published · cited 7× · 2020 Ohio 2895
[Cite as State v. Hull, 2020-Ohio-2895.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2019-L-126 - vs - : FLOYD J
Bingham v. Thomaspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-09-02 · Published · cited 967× · 654 F.3d 1171; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18293; 2011 WL 3862101
654 F.3d 1171 (2011) Randall BINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darlene THOMAS, Officer, Paula Isom, Officer, Marty Allen, D/W of Security, Christopher Railey, D/W of Care and Treatment, Jim Rigsby, D/W of Administration, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-10349. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 2, 2011. *1174
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-11-19 · Published · cited 1× · 146 F. Supp. 3d 1005; 2015 WL 7293509
OPINION AND ORDER SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge In this coverage action, Thermos L.L.C. (“Thermos”) seeks to recover defense and indemnity costs from three of its insurers — Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”), the Travelers Indemnity Company of America (“Travelers”), and National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford (“National Fire”) (collectively, the “insurers”)—arising from a p
State v. Hullpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-01-07 · Published · cited 4× · 2019 Ohio 23
[Cite as State v. Hull, 2019-Ohio-23.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2018-L-050 - vs - : FLOYD
Thomas v. Bryantpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010-08-20 · Published · cited 329× · 614 F.3d 1288; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17419; 2010 WL 3270965
614 F.3d 1288 (2010) Jeremiah THOMAS, Michael McKinney, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Randall BRYANT, in his official capacity, Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellants. No. 09-11658. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. August 20, 2010. *1293 Craig D. Feiser, Volpe Bajalia Wickes, Jac
Sears v. Hullpublic domain
Arizona Supreme Court · 1998-07-16 · Published · cited 107× · 961 P.2d 1013; 192 Ariz. 65; 273 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 36; 1998 Ariz. LEXIS 75
JONES, Vice Chief Justice, specially concurring: I concur in the judgment and rationale of the court. I write separately, however, to remind the parties that today’s opinion, once again, does not resolve the federal question identified and discussed in the concurring opinion in Salt River Pimar-Maricopa Indian Community v. Hull, 190 Ariz. 97,105, 945 P.2d 818, 826 (1997). That discussion, though sti
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 Ohio 5054
[Cite as State ex rel. Hull v. Culotta, 2019-Ohio-5054.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO ex rel. FLOYD J. HULL, : PER CURIAM OPINION Relator, : CASE NO. 2019-L-086 - vs -
Hull v. Albrechtpublic domain
Arizona Supreme Court · 1997-12-23 · Published · cited 20× · 950 P.2d 1141; 190 Ariz. 520; 259 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5; 1997 Ariz. LEXIS 135
950 P.2d 1141 (1997) 190 Ariz. 520 Governor Jane Dee HULL, Intervenor/Petitioner, v. Hon. Rebecca A. ALBRECHT, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, Respondent Judge, and ROOSEVELT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 66, et al; Lisa Graham Keegan, Superintendent of Public Instruction; State Board of Education; State of Arizona, Real Parties in Interest. No. CV-97-0369-SA.
State v. Hullpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-01-17 · Published · cited 19× · 2017 Ohio 157; 77 N.E.3d 484
[Cite as State v. Hull, 2017-Ohio-157.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2016-L-035 - vs - : FLOYD J. HULL, SR.,
Timmons v. Hullpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-01-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 178
[Cite as Timmons v. Hull, 2024-Ohio-178.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY JAMES TIMMONS, ET AL. : : Appellees : C.A. No. 2023-CA-23 : v.
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 606 N.W.2d 392; 238 Mich. App. 441
606 N.W.2d 392 (1999) 238 Mich. App. 441 MPC CASHWAY LUMBER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary L. HULL, Defendant-Appellee, and Passalacqua Builders, Inc., and Joseph Passalacqua, Defendants/Cross-Defendants, and Homeowner Construction Lien Recovery Fund, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee. Docket No. 207282. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Subm
Ruiz v. Hullpublic domain
Arizona Supreme Court · 1998-04-28 · Published · cited 81× · 957 P.2d 984; 191 Ariz. 441; 268 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3; 1998 Ariz. LEXIS 34
957 P.2d 984 (1998) 191 Ariz. 441 Armando RUIZ, Linda Aguirre, John Philip Evans, Rosie Garcia, Candido Mercado, Manuel Pena, Jr., Peter Rios, Jr., Macario Saldate IV, Federico Sanchez and Victor Soltero, Plaintiffs/Appellants/ Cross-Appellees, v. Jane Dee HULL, Governor of Arizona; Grant Woods, Attorney General of Arizona; State of Arizona; Arizonans for Official English and Robert D. Park, Intervenors, Defendants/Appelle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-09-19 · Published · cited 11× · 305 F.3d 1015; 2002 WL 31085603
RYMER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I agree with the majority that the tribes have a keen interest in gaming compacts, and that their interest in future compacts could be affected as a practical matter by the outcome of this litigation. However, the relief sought in this case does not affect existing compacts; it concerns only the Governor’s authority under state law to enter into gaming compacts prospecti
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-06-26 · Published · cited 19× · 927 F.3d 1203
Case: 17-14824 Date Filed: 06/26/2019 Page: 1 of 38 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-14824 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 0:11-cv-60772-KAM; 0:11-cv-60780-KAM L.J., by his mothe
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 Ohio 2145
[Cite as State ex rel. Hull v. Culotta, 2018-Ohio-2145.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO ex rel. : PER CURIAM OPINION FLOYD J. HULL, : Relator, : CASE NO.