Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1863 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THOMAS J. WILKINSON, IV, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1863 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THOMAS J. WILKINSON, IV, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the result reached by the majority in this sad and difficult case and join in the court’s opinion in all respects except for Part III.A.1. I write separately because I am troubled by the court’s holding that we can, as a matter of law, say that Thomas Wilkinson’s constitutional rights were not violated by the SRS investigation. Since, however, the unreasonabl

WICKER, J. This case is before us for review of a May 22, 2018 judgment in the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court sustaining an Exception of Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter raised by defendant/appellee, Karen Parker. For the following reasons we reverse the judgment of the state district court and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 23, 2011 Session CORIN MUCHA WILKINSON v. THOMAS GREGG WILKINSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 08D-2770 Carol Soloman, Judge No. M2010-01974-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 29, 2011 This case concerns the divorce of Thomas Gregg Wilkinson (“Husband”) and Corin Mucha Wilkin

WICKER, J. This case is before us for review of a May 22, 2018 judgment in the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court sustaining an Exception of Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter raised by defendant/appellee, Karen Parker. For the following reasons we reverse the judgment of the state district court and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 23, 2011 Session CORIN MUCHA WILKINSON v. THOMAS GREGG WILKINSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 08D-2770 Carol Soloman, Judge No. M2010-00026-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 29, 2011 Corin Mucha Wilkinson (“Wife”) filed a petition for criminal contempt in the Circuit Court for D

PER CURIAM.* _JjThis proceeding arises out of an application for reinstatement to the practice of law filed by petitioner, Thomas G. Wilkinson, an attorney currently suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana. UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In In re: Wilkinson, 13-0822 (La.5/3/13), 115 So.3d 1137, we accepted a joint petition -for con

609 F.Supp.2d 489 (2009) Teresa M. EVANS, Plaintiff v. Thomas WILKINSON, et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. RWT 08-1176. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 23, 2009. *490 Teresa M. Evans, Piney Point, MD, pro se. Bryan T. Dugan, Dugan McKissick Wood and Longmore LLC, Lexington Park, MD, Elizabeth Ann Frey, Do

Amy M. Wilkinson ("the mother") appeals from an order of the Marshall Circuit Court that terminated the child-support obligation of Michael A. Wilkinson ("the father") and declined to order the father to pay a portion of the postminority *Page 1273 educational expenses of the parties' children. The record on appeal reveals the following. The mother and the father were divorced in February 1988. The parties had two children; the older child

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104-3741 ASSISTANT CLERK TELEPHONE 334-229-0733 January 26, 2024 CL-2023-0110 Thomas Rhett McAdams, Sr. v. Thomas Rhett McAdams, Jr., and Olivia Grace Wilkinson (Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court: CV-22-901099). ORDER You are hereby

ORDER |! Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, IT IS ORDERED that Thomas G. Wilkinson, Louisiana Bar Roll number 2184, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately-

Stein, J. *852Petitioner, a police officer, sustained an injury to his left shoulder in a motor vehicle accident in April 2002. Petitioner thereafter reinjured his left shoulder when he was involved in a physical altercation while investigating a stabbing in September 2003. In August 2004, petitioner had applications for accidental disability and performance of duty dis

52 So.3d 1270 (2011) Sam KAZERY, Appellant v. George WILKINSON, Appellee. No. 2009-CA-01391-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. February 1, 2011. *1271 Thomas M. Bryson, Jackson, attorney for Appellant. Vernon H. Chadwick, Jackson, attorney for Appellee. Before MYERS, P.J., GRIFFIS and BARNES, JJ. GRIFFIS,

OPINION OF THE COURT Fisher, J.P. The issue presented on this appeal is whether the admission of evidence that the defendant, a 65-year-old owner of a taxi service on trial for a single sale of cocaine, sold drugs to the same buyer on several prior occasions was error requiring a new trial. We hold that it was. On April 20, 2007, at a bar in Westhampton Beach in Suffolk County, an unde

679 S.E.2d 766 (2009) WILKINSON v. The STATE. No. A09A0249. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 3, 2009. *767 Richard M. Darden, for appellant. Spencer Lawton, Jr., Dist. Atty., Thomas M. Cerbone, Savannah, Margaret E. Heap, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee. BARNES, Judge. James Dean Wilkinson was convicted of

230 P.3d 136 (2010) 2010 UT App 56 Paul A. WILKINSON, Donna Wilkinson, Eldon D. East, and Sherene East, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. WASHINGTON CITY, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20090114-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. March 11, 2010. *137 Justin D. Heideman and Michael A. Parkes, Provo, for Appellants.

OPINION AND ORDER SESSIONS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Russell, Adams, and Jeffords Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I (Libel and Slander), Count II (Negligence), Count V (Deprivation of Civil Rights), Count VT (Denial of Due Process), Count VII (Conspiracy), Count VIII (Infliction of Emotional Distress), and Count IX (Negligence Per Se). This opinion con

ORDER Thomas Wilkinson filed a sprawling 200-page pro se complaint in district court, naming numerous banks and their law firms as defendants, and citing various federal and state civil and criminal statutes, including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692-1692p. The court could not, however, glean the substance of his claims from his complaint and ordered Wilkinson to amend his pleading for clarity. A seco

544 U.S. 709 (2005) CUTTER ET AL. v. WILKINSON, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, et al. No. 03-9877. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 21, 2005. Decided May 31, 2005. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. *710 *7