Cases

Rule 23 order filed 2023 IL App (5th) 210391 January 25, 2023. Motion to publish granted NO. 5-21-0391 February 17, 2023. IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THERESA A. SOLOMON, as Guardian of the ) Appeal from the Estate of Megan Leigh Farmer, a Disabled

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2243 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. THOMAS PROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF ILLINOIS, INC., and MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2243 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. THOMAS PROSE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF ILLINOIS, INC., and MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ________________

Jason Mercer v. Thomas B. Finan Center, No. 1398, Sept. Term 2019. Opinion by Arthur, J. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION — RIGHT TO REQUEST ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL — FORCED MEDICATION OF CONFINED INDIVIDUALS Under Md. Code (1982, 2019 Repl. Vol.), § 10-708(1) of the Health-General Article (“HG”), patients involuntarily confined to mental health facilities have the right to request legal or non-legal representation when appealing a clinical review panel’s approval of a decision to administer medication

08/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 18, 2018 Session CINDY HATFIELD, ET AL. v. ALLENBROOKE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004249-10 Donna M. Fields, Judge

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Rosewood Care Center is a skilled nursing facility participating in Medicare and Medicaid. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services assessed a civil monetary penalty against Rosewood on the grounds that it had failed to protect a resident from abuse, failed to timely report or to investigate thoroughly allegations of abuse, and failed to implement it

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–0737 Filed December 20, 2019 MICHAEL THOMAS GOODWIN, Plaintiff, vs. IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DAVIS COUNTY, Defendant. Certiorari to the Iowa District Court for Davis County, Joel D. Yates, Judge. Juvenile offender challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. WRIT ANNULLED; DISTRICT COURT RULING AND SENTENCE

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Court Judge: Plaintiffs in this action have challenged Defendants’ decisions to close a state-operated institution for the developmentally disabled and to assess its residents for potential transfers into community living arrangements. Plaintiffs contend that this conduct constitutes disability discrimination in violation of federal law, deni

SMITH, Justice. These two petitions for the writ of mandamus, which have been consolidated for purposes of issuing one opinion, involve separate actions against Fairfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C. (“Fair-field”), in the Jefferson Circuit Court. The trial court entered an order in both actions requiring Fairfield to produce certain documents that Fairfield asserts are privileged under § 22-21-8, Ala.Code 1975, a

ACCEPTED 12-15-00189-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/16/2015 5:22:49 PM

ACCEPTED 12-15-00189-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/30/2015 8:54:48 PM

529 S.E.2d 600 (2000) 207 W.Va. 135 Judy BANFI, Executrix of the Estate of Bertha Cunningham, Deceased, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOSPITAL FOR REHABILITATION, a Corporation, and Manjula Narayan, M.D., Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 26659. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted February 22, 2000. Decided Apri

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge. INTRODUCTION...............................................................595 FINDINGS OF FACT...........................................................597 A. Emergency Planning for People with Disabilities............................597 B. The City’s Emergency Planning Structure .......

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND STRIKE Re: Dkt. Nos. 78, 79, 81, 86, 87 WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint alleges that defendants created a complex criminal enterprise involving fake companies, fake identifications, and large-scale illegal taping of reproductive health care conferences and private meetings in order to advance their goal

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2008-CA-01558-SCT THE MISSISSIPPI METHODIST HOSPITAL AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC. d/b/a METHODIST SPECIALTY CARE CENTER v. MISSISSIPPI DIVISION OF MEDICAID AND ROBERT L. ROBINSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF MISSISSIPPI DIVISION OF MEDICAID DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/11/2008 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. J. DEWAYNE THOMAS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

CHANDLER, Justice, for the Court. ¶ 1. The Mississippi Division of Medicaid (DOM) amended its regulations, known as the “State Plan,” to reduce the reimbursement rate applicable to private nursing facilities for the severely disabled (PNFSDs). Specifically, State Plan Amendment 2006-006 (SPA 2006-006) placed a ceiling on the Medicaid reimbursement of a PNFSD for its administrative and operating costs. The on

Filed 5/26/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT KERN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, F083743 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-20-102979) v. OPINION DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,544 POWERBACK REHABILITATION, LLC, Appellee, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When determining whether

Sharon G. Lee, J. A rehabilitation hospital hired a medical transportation company to take a patient to a doctor's appointment. Before the transport, the company's driver required the patient to sign an agreement that, in part, released the company from any liability. After the appointment, the patient fell as he was getting into the company's van. He sued the medical transportation com

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit