Cases

Opinion filed August 21, 2015 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-13-00326-CR __________ KIRK THOMAS MORROW, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 142nd District Court

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Kirk Thomas Morrow, * From the 142nd District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. CR40551. Vs. No. 11-13-00326-CR * August 21, 2015 The State of Texas, * Memorandum O

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 5, 2007 Session THOMAS MORROW, ET AL. v. RONNIE BULL, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 02C2245 W. Neil Thomas, III, Judge No. E2007-00606-COA-R3-CV - FILED FEBRUARY 27, 2008 The tenants, who leased a newly-constructed house from the builder/owner

THOMAS, Judge. *1056Bridgette Morrow appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court ("the circuit court") in favor of S. Lee Pake. We reverse the circuit court's judgment and remand this cause for further proceedings. Background In 2014, Morrow began renting a house from Pak

THOMAS, Judge. *1056Bridgette Morrow appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court ("the circuit court") in favor of S. Lee Pake. We reverse the circuit court's judgment and remand this cause for further proceedings. Background In 2014, Morrow began renting a house from Pak

KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice | )On October 15, 2012, appellant, Richard Morrow, entered a negotiated plea of guilty to second-degree sexual assault in the Sharp County Circuit Court, with an offense date of February 5, 2012. Morrow was sentenced to ten years’ probation and subject to the sex-offender-registration requirements in Ark. Code

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 19, 2013 Session ROBBIN MORROW ELLIOTT ET AL. v. MICHAEL R. MORROW Appeal from the Chancery Court for Meigs County No. 4392 Frank V. Williams, III, Chancellor No. E2013-00692-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 23, 2013 In this real property dispute, the plaintiffs, three siblings, brought a complaint agai

O’Donnell, J., dissenting. {¶ 19} Respectfully, I dissent. {¶ 20} The majority concludes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it included certain employer-provided benefits in Jeffrey Morrow’s gross income in deciding whether to modify child support payments. In my view, its conclusion fails to account for the value of the busines

OPINION ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice. Appellant Aaron Morrow appeals his convictions that arise out of an incident in which he repeatedly fired a semiautomatic AK-47 rifle at Joseph Rivera and two of Rivera’s friends. A Ramsey County grand jury indicted him with nine counts, including one count of first-degree premeditated murder and two counts of attempted first-degree premeditated murder. Following a jur

MOREMEN, Judge. The Lyon Circuit Court granted a writ of habeas corpus to appellee, Edgar Morrow, and ordered his release from confinement in the state penitentiary and from the parole which had been granted to him by the state parole board. The Commonwealth appeals. A bare chronicle of the events which transpired after his arrest and before he was committed to the penitentiary proves conclusively that he

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On July 15, 2005, Miquel Morrow (“Morrow”) was convicted by a jury in this Court of: conspiracy to conduct and participate, directly and indirectly, in the affairs of an enterprise, through a pattern of racketeering activity (“Count I”), including the armed robbery of the Bank of Americ

PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Pettway v. State, 776 So.2d 930 (Fla.2000) (recognizing that where a party has been banned from appearing in a tribunal without counsel, that does not authorize the party to proceed pro se in another tribunal when the banning court is the proper forum). VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

KAPSNER, Justice, concurring in the result. [¶ 15] I concur in the result. [¶ 16] However, rather than suggest that there is anything defective in the form which the Department provides, I concur because the form was filled out by the patrol officer in a manner that would have indicated that the Department had no authority to suspend Morrow’s driving privileges. [¶ 1

PER CURIAM: * After having reviewed the record, studied the briefs, and heard argument, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

717 S.E.2d 168 (2011) 289 Ga. 864 HUMPHREY v. MORROW. Morrow v. Humphrey. Nos. S11A0937, S11X0938. Supreme Court of Georgia. October 17, 2011. *171 Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Mary Beth Westmoreland, Deputy Atty. Gen., Patricia A. Burton, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Lyndsey J. Hurst, Sabrina D. Grah

335 S.W.3d 116 (2009) Jesse B. TUCKER v. Jim MORROW, Warden. No. E2009-00803-CCA-R3-HC. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville. Assigned on Briefs September 22, 2009. December 1, 2009. *118 Jesse B. Tucker, Pikeville, Tennessee, pro se. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; an

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA25-20 Filed 16 July 2025 Wake County, No. 22CVD001738-910 CALVIN FRANK MORROW III, Plaintiff, v. KERRY SUSAN VALLANT MORROW, Defendant. Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 13 June 2024 by Judge J. Brian Ratledge in Wake County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 12 June 2025. Connell & Gelb, PLLC, by Michelle D. Conn

17 So.3d 763 (2009) David L. MORROW, Appellant, v. SAM'S CLUB and Sedgwick CMS, Appellees. No. 1D08-6057. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 31, 2009. Bradley Guy Smith of Smith, Feddeler, Smith & Miles, P.A., Lakeland, Susan W. Fox of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tampa, and Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appe

SILBERMAN, Judge. Thomas Morrow died after being severely beaten by a fellow prisoner while Andrew W. Izrailov was transporting the men to a Pinellas County Sheriffs Office (“PCSO”) facility. Personal representative Sharon Morrow subsequently filed a wrongful death action against Izrailov and his employer, G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. (“G4S”). G4S, which was handling prisone

Jackie Lynn Morrow failed to ask the trial court to conduct an in camera inspection and thereby failed to obtain an adverse ruling and failed to preserve the issue for appellate review. I therefore respectfully dissent. As the quotation from the record in the majority opinion demonstrates, Morrow's counsel asked the trial court only to order the prosecutor to turn Couch's inculpatory statements over to the defense. However, unless the statements are exculpatory, the law forbids