Cases

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. This case involves what people in the roofing business call a mismatch problem. It often happens that when a part of a roof is damaged, matching replacement shingles are not available and so replacing only the damaged shingles will result in a roof with shingles that do not match. Homeowners quite reasonably do not like how this looks, and so they ask their insure

NO. 07-07-0294-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A AUGUST 4, 2008 ______________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORI LEIGH MAYLES NOONAN AND THOMAS A. NOONAN, JR.

NO. 07-07-0294-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A AUGUST 4, 2008 ______________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORI L

OPINION MACKEY K. HANCOCK, Justice. Appellant, Lori Leigh Mayles Noonan (Lori), appeals the granting of a summary judgment in favor of Thomas A. Noonan, Jr. (Thomas). We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background Lori and Thomas were married in 1973. In 2001, the parties executed a post-nuptial agreement.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

607 F.3d 277 (2010) Frederick GROSSMITH, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Richard NOONAN, in his capacity as Sergeant of the Foxborough Police Department and individually; Joseph McDonald, in his capacity as Police Officer of the Foxborough Police Department and individually, Defendants, Appellees. No. 09-1900. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted May 6, 2010.

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Ordered that the order entered February 19, 2010, insofar as appealed from, and the order entered April 30, 2010 are affirmed, without costs; and it is further, ordered that so much of the appeal as is from the order dated March 29, 2010 is dismissed. In these three consolidated summary proceedings, petitioner, a receiver appointed in a mortgage foreclosure

740 F.Supp.2d 970 (2010) Dennis NOONAN and Lana Noonan, Plaintiffs, v. Thomas HARRINGTON, Defendant. Case No. 09-CV-03191. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. September 16, 2010. *972 William A. Allison, Allison & Mosby-Scott, Bloomington, IL, for Plaintiff. David A. Bailie, Thomas, Mamer

783 N.W.2d 733 (2010) Ralph SCHMITZ, et al., Appellants, v. RINKE, NOONAN, SMOLEY, DETER, COLOMBO, WIANT, VON KORFF AND HOBBS, LTD. d/b/a Rinke Noonan, Respondent. No. A09-1282. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. June 29, 2010. *735 Stephen F. Rufer, Pemberton, Sorlie, Rufer & Kershner, P.L.L.P., Fergus Falls, MN, for appellant.<

PER CURIAM. This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Norcott, J. This appeal arises out of a dispute over the release of confidential information regarding psychiatric treatment. The plaintiff, Robert W. Skrzypiec,1 brought an action alleging negligence and a violation of General Statutes §§ 52-146d and 52-146e2 against *4the defendants, J. P. Augustine Noonan, a psychia

Bartle, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Frank Noonan, Randy Feathers, Richard A. Sheetz, Jr., E. Marc Costanzo, and Frank Fina have filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Kathleen Kane, the former Pennsylvania Attorney General, and against Michael Miletto, an investigator in the Office of the Atto

MEMORANDUM Bartle, District Judge. Plaintiff are Frank Noonan (“Noonan”), Rahdy Feathers (“Feathers”), Richard A. Sheetz, Jr. (“Sheetz”), E. Marc Costanzo (“Costanzo”), and Frank Fina (“Fina”), four of whom are former high level employees of the Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania (“OAC”) and one of whom is a retired Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police. They have filed this action against

No opinion. Motion granted.

Justice Indeglia, for the Court. In this action, which involves various allegations against Charles D. Moreau (Moreau), the former mayor of the City of Central Falls, the plaintiffs, Thomas Shannahan (Shannahan), Thomas Wilson (Wilson), Donald D. Twohig (Donald D.), and the Estate of Donald P. Twohig (Donald P.) (collectively plaintiffs),

Smith, P. J.: The action is brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff was employed by the defendants to make some improvements upon the real property owned by Azilda Noonan. He claimed the sum of $241. The defendants claimed that the repairs were to be made for $200, which was found as a fact by the referee. There was a claim for extras to the amount of $9.26 about which there was no dispute, so that upon the fin

Motion granted.

MEMORANDUM A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge Presently before the Court are.Defendants Canton Borough and Douglas See-ley’s (“Canton Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 80.); Defendants Towanda Borough, John Storzyk, and James L. Hart’s (“Towanda Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 82.); and Defendants Frank Noonan, Jeffrey Miller (“Colonel. Miller”), John Yéncha (“Corpor

DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge. The plaintiff, Joan Peters, has moved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a temporary restraining order against the defendant, Judge Robert C. Noonan, Genesee County Surrogate Judge, to stop Judge Noonan from probating a will made by her son, David C. Peters. The will purports to bequeath to various persons, pursuant to New York

RAU, J.1 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff-appellant Thomas Carl appeals the grant of summary judgment in this legal-malpractice action where on the day of the scheduled trial the trial judge precluded plaintiff-appellant’s expert evidence based on defendants-appellees’ assertion that they had never been properly noticed of plaintiff-appellant’s expert witness, nor rece