Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Thompson v. Baillie Lumber Company”
Baillie Lumber Co. v. Thompsonpublic domain
612 S.E.2d 296 (2005) 279 Ga. 288 BAILLIE LUMBER COMPANY v. THOMPSON et al. No. S05Q0587. Supreme Court of Georgia. April 26, 2005. *297 Tilman Eugene Self, III, Ed S. Sell, III, Sell & Melton, Macon, for Appellant. Hubert C. Lovein, Jr., Jones, Cork & Miller, LLP, Macon, Grant T. Stein, Sea
Baillie Lumber Co. v. Thompsonpublic domain
BIRCH, Circuit Judge: CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA, PURSUANT TO O.C.G.A. § 15-2-9. TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA AND ITS HONORABLE JUSTICES: In this case we must determine if a corporate entity in bankruptcy has exclusive standing to bring a state alter ego action against its principal. Baillie Lumber Company (“Baillie
Baillie Lumber Co. v. Bert F. Thompsonpublic domain
BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This case returns to us for disposition from the Supreme Court of Georgia, to which we certified two questions of Georgia state law. The Baillie Lumber Company (“Baillie Lumber”), a creditor of Icarus Holding, LLC (“Icarus”), appeals the order of the district court holding that Baillie Lumber’s state alter ego action against Icarus’s principal member and
Baillie Lumber Co. v. Bert F. Thompsonpublic domain
391 F.3d 1315 In Re ICARUS HOLDING, LLC, a.k.a. Piedmont Hardwood Flooring, LLC, Debtor.Baillie Lumber Company, LP, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Bert F. Thompson, Icarus Holding, LLC, f.k.a. Piedmont Hardwood Flooring, LLC., Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-15932. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. December 2, 2004. COPY
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES D. WALKER, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Bert F. Thompson’s Complaint for Injunctive Relief and on Plaintiff Edwards Wood Products, Inc.’s Complaint for Damages. Both proceedings have raised the issue of who may sue the principal of a debtor in possession under an alter ego theory. This is a core matter within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157
Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United Statespublic domain
425 F.Supp.2d 1321 (2006) CANADIAN LUMBER TRADE ALLIANCE; Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc.; Canadian Wheat Board; Ontario Forest Indus. Ass'n; Ontario Lumber Mfgs Ass'n; the Free Trade Lumber Council; and the Government of Canada, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America; Deborah J. Spero, Acting Commissioner, United States Customs & Border Protection; and United States Customs & Border Protection, Defendants, and Coalition for Fair Lumber
FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, P. J., HODGES and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules June
Raytheon Company v. Boccard USA Corporationpublic domain
OPINION LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice. Boccard USA Corporation sued Ray-theon Company seeking to hold it liable for a breach of contract by Raytheon Company’s former third-tier subsidiary, United *629 Engineers International, Inc. (“United Engineers”) based on the theory of a
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Rickie Simspublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00123-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/16/2015 4:39:11 PM
Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.public domain
Denied October 16, 1917. Petition for Rehearing, (167 Pac. 1167.) On petition for rehearing. Petition denied. Mr. James H. Nichols, Messrs. Smith <& Smith, and Mr. John L. Rand, for the petition. Mr. Harris Richardson and Mr. Morton D. Clifford, contra. In Banc. Mb. Justice McCama
Richards v. D. R. Horton, Inc.public domain
MILLER, Presiding Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the majority’s opinion to reverse the trial court’s dismissal of Richards’s claims against D. R. Horton, Inc., because he does in fact have standing to raise these claims. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Richards’s claims against t
Anthony Kittrell v. Dream Buiilder Investment, Inc.public domain
FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., MCMILLIAN, P. J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 28, 2020
Wayne Lyle v. Fulcrum Loan Holdings, LLCpublic domain
FOURTH DIVISION McFADDEN, C. J., DOYLE, P. J. and COOMER, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules March 13, 2020
Jeffrey Bryant v. Optima International Inc.public domain
Branch, Judge. Jeffrey Bryant appeals from two separate orders of the DeKalb County Superior Court, both of which arose out of a single lawsuit and both of which were entered on the same day The first of these orders granted summary judgment against Bryant and in favor of Optima International, Inc. (“Optima”), on a 2001 promissory note Bryant executed in conjunction with a loan he
Christopher v. Sinyardpublic domain
723 S.E.2d 78 (2012) 313 Ga. App. 866 CHRISTOPHER v. SINYARD et al. No. A11A2127. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 1, 2012. *80 Alexander, Royston, Hardman & Shinall, R. Phillip Shinall III, Covington, for appellant. Crudup & Hendricks, Hillary Wiggins Edgar, for appellees. PHIPP
Anthony v. Gator Cochran Construction, Inc.public domain
682 S.E.2d 140 (2009) ANTHONY et al. v. GATOR COCHRAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. No. A09A0687. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 23, 2009. Reconsideration Denied July 15, 2009. *141 Johnston, Wilkin & Williams, William J. Williams, Augusta, for appellants. Jay M. Sawilowsky, Augusta, for appellee. DOYLE
Johnson v. Allied Recycling, Inc.public domain
Branch, Judge. Dana Johnson (“Dana”)1 brings this interlocutory appeal from the denial of her motion to dismiss the claims asserted against her by Allied Recycling, Inc. Dana contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion because Allied’s claims against her are barred by the bankruptcy filing of one of her co-defendants, Demon Demo, Inc. Specifically, Dana argues that because Allied’s
Flatau v. Johnson (In re Stewart)public domain
ORDER LAND, District Judge. William M. Flatau (“Trustee”) appeals the bankruptcy court’s order granting Howard E. Johnson’s motion to lift the automatic stay in the matter of John Benjamin Stewart, Jr., Johnson v. Flatau (In re Stewart), 329 B.R. 910 (Bankr.M.D.Ga. 2005). For the following reasons, the Court affirms the bankruptcy court’s order. STANDARD OF REVIEW</
Pazur v. Belcherpublic domain
659 S.E.2d 804 (2008) PAZUR v. BELCHER. Belcher v. Pazur. Nos. A08A0512, A08A0513. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 21, 2008. Reconsideration Denied April 2, 2008. *805 Foltz & Martin, Kevin H. Hudson, Jonathan E. Hawkins, Atlanta, for appellant. Brock, Clay, Calhoun & Rogers, Eric A.
343 B.R. 372 (2005) In re HIDDEN POINTE PROPERTIES, L.P., Debtor. Wilmann LLC, Plaintiff, v. Alexander Properties Group, Inc., Kay Borders d/b/a Borders `N' Blooms Landscaping, and Borders `N' Blooms Landscaping, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-65132, Adversary No. 05-6197. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. June 20, 2005.