Cases

ORDER Jean Thompson filed two applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DBI”), alleging different impairments in overlapping periods. The Appeals Council consolidated her applications, amended the onset date of her disability to August 2007, and remanded. Thompson narrowed her claim to allege that she became disabled from fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. An administrative law judge rejected this claim, and the Appeals

MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, District Judge In February of 2005, the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) learned that Plaintiff Hugo Absalon Suarez, a recipient of Social Security benefits, had been deported to his native Mexico following a period of incarceration for gun and alien transportation convictions. By statute, Plai

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge I.Introduction Plaintiff Chandra Nichele Moss (“Moss”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act. She seeks review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), who denied her application for Disability Insur

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FERNANDO FONTANEZ, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2844 (RDM) U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Sometimes, the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) pays someone too much money. Receiving a

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Thomas L. Thompson’s (“Thompson”) application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq,, and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Anthony Heitz brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) challenging the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny his claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act (“SSA”). On October 22, 2015, Heitz moved for judgment on the pleadings. See Notice of Motion for Judgment on t

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ZOBEL, S.D.J. Plaintiff Stacy Thompson appeals from a final decision by the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) upholding the ruling of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) that denied her application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits (“SSDI”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). Plaintiff c

*957DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #13) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #14) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECU

OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Docs. 1, 17, 18, 19] JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Vernelis K. Armstrong recommends this Court affirm the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income to Plaintiff Belinda Henry.1 Because substantial evidence supported the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) c

OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Charles Gayheart applied for Social Security disability insurance benefits (DIB) in December 2005 due to manifestations of anxiety, panic disorder, bipolar disorder, and depression. After an initial denial of his application and three separate hearings, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found that the limitations ca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Carrie Hastings v. Civil No. 17-cv-84-JL Opinion No. 2018 DNH 185 Nancy A. Berryhil, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration ORDER ON APPEAL At issue in this Social Security appeal is whether an Administrative Law Judge erred when, after a remand, he “reconsidered” his

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Justin L. Venus v. Case No. 17-cv-482-PB Opinion No. 2019 DNH 005 Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration O R D E R Justin Venus moves to reverse the decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) to deny his

DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief United States District Judge Currently before the Court, in this Social Security action filed by Cheryl Dom-*115mes, (“Plaintiff’) against the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “the Commissioner”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on t

ORDER • Sue L. Robinson, Senior United States District Judge At Wilmington this 8th day of March, 2017, having considered the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon on February 17, 2017, and upon the expiration of the time allowed for objections pursuant to Rule -72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with no objections having been filed;

ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed October 16, 2015, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq.

ORDER Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Christine Carstensen appeals from the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for disability insur-*1132anee benefits (“DIB”), filed pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433. Jurisdiction is proper

ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER Blackburn, United States District Judge The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [#1],1 filed July 8, 2015, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq, I h

MEMORANDUM OPINION SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Sarah Lindsey brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits [DIB]. Upon review of the record, the parties’ submissions, and the relevant law, the c

ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER Blackburn United States District Judge The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed September 8, 2015, *1164seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the So

ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Charles D. Cobb’s complaint [Docket No. 1] filed on November 6, 2013. Plaintiff seeks review of the final decision of defendant Carolyn W. Colvin (the “Commissioner”) denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33 and 1