Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Thompson v. Dickerson”
Dickerson v. Thompsonpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Peters, J.P Plaintiff and defendant, residents of New York, entered into a civil union in Vermont in April 2003. In November 2007, plaintiff, unable to obtain a dissolution of the civil union in Vermont due to that state’s residency requirements (see Vt Stat Ann, tit 15, §§ 592, 1206), commenced the instant action for equitable and declaratory relief seeking a judgment dissol
Dickerson v. Thompsonpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Peters, J. The narrow issue before us is whether Supreme Court has subject matter jurisdiction to entertain an action for equitable and declaratory relief seeking dissolution of a civil union validly entered into outside of this state. We hold that it does. In April 2003, plaintiff and defendant traveled to Vermont and entered into a civil union in accordance with Vermont
Yeager v. Dickersonpublic domain
OPINION STUMBO, Judge: These appeals arise from the same action below and were heard together by the Court. The primary issue presented by these appeals is whether, under Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 446.070, Donna Yeager has a right of action against the Appellees, both attorneys, who disclosed medical information during the course of a child custody hearing when Yeager alleges a violation of t
State of Louisiana v. Warren L. Dickersonpublic domain
Judgment rendered June 28, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 55,088-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA App
Dickerson v. Thompsonpublic domain
Defendant Ohio Insurance Guaranty Association ("OIGA") appeals from the judgment of the trial court which ordered it to pay four "covered claims" in connection with the death of Arthur Dickerson, Jr. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part. I On January 15, 1984, Dickerson ("decedent") was shot by a co-worker at his place of employment, National Engineering and Contracting Company ("NECO"). Dickerson la
Dickerson v. Statepublic domain
317 S.W.3d 99 (2010) Bryan L. DICKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 93107. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. May 11, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 23, 2010. Application for Transfer Denied August 31, 2010. Scott Thompson, Saint Louis, MO, f
Ray Darris Thompson v. Stanley Dickersonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON ______________________________________________ RAY DARRIS THOMPSON, Vs. Plaintiff-Appellant, FILED Shelby Circuit No. 56881 C.A. No. 02A01-9702-CV-00034
United States v. James Dickersonpublic domain
*62 BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge: In April 2012, James Dickerson was indicted along with thirty-seven other defendants and charged in two counts — conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 28 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ -841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B),
Dickerson v. Statepublic domain
269 S.W.3d 889 (2008) Bryan DICKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. SC 89142. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. October 28, 2008. Motion for Rehearing or Modification Denied December 16, 2008. *890 Scott Thompson, Office of Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Richard A. Sta
People v. Thompsonpublic domain
— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 23, 2008 (People v Thompson, 54 AD3d 975 [2008]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 15, 2005. Ordered that the application is denied.
People v. Thompsonpublic domain
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 23, 2008 (People v Thompson, 54 AD3d 975 [2008]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 15, 2005. Ordered that the application is denied.
People v. Thompsonpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered December 15, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and escape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court imposed May 3, 2011, sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to determinate terms of imprisonment of 20 years upon his convictions of robbery in the
People v. Thompsonpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered December 15, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and escape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court imposed May 3, 2011, sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to determinate terms of imprisonment of 20 years upon his convictions of robbery in the
State v. Dickersonpublic domain
542 S.E.2d 487 (2001) 273 Ga. 408 The STATE v. DICKERSON. Dickerson v. The State. Nos. S00G0646, S00G0696. Supreme Court of Georgia. February 5, 2001. *489 Daniel J. Porter, Dist. Atty., Donald Geary, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellant. Chandler & Britt, Walter M. Britt, Deborah F. Wei
Hoffman v. Dickersonpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari before this court seeks review of an order denying a motion to consolidate two eases below. The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed because this court does not have jurisdiction. The petition was filed more than thirty days after the entry of the order denying consolidation. A motion for rehearing directed to an interlocutory order is unauthorized a
State v. Dickersonpublic domain
2022 UT App 56 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY LAVELL DICKERSON, Appellee. Opinion No. 20191052-CA Filed May 5, 2022 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable Derek P. Pullan
Thompson, Associate Judge: In these appeals, the District of Columbia Department of Public Works ("DPW") and the District of Columbia Office of Human Rights ("OHR") have filed joint briefs challenging rulings in which the Superior Court (1) concluded that plaintiff/appellee/cross-appellant Jeffrey Dickerson was subjected to disparate treatment based on race and a racially hostile work e
Thompson v. Lynchpublic domain
990 A.2d 432 (2010) Billie Lynn THOMPSON, an individual and Billie Lynn Thompson as Substitute Trustee of the Estate of William F. Dickerson, Respondents Below, Appellants, v. John R. LYNCH and Dewey C. Lynch, Petitioners Below, Appellees. No. 429, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: December 16, 2009. Decided: February 25, 2010.
AG Resource Management, LLC. and Agrifund, LLC v. Bunge North America, Inc. and Danny Allen Dickersonpublic domain
Judgment rendered March 4, 2020. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,417-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** AG RESOURCE Plain
657 F.3d 595 (2011) Robert E. DICKERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT NO. 522, Counties of St. Clair, Madison, Monroe, Randolph, Washington, Bond, Perry and Montgomery and State of Illinois, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-3381. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued June 7, 2011. Decided September 16, 2011