Cases

121 S.W.3d 220 (2003) Larry HAMPTON, Respondent, v. BIG BOY STEEL ERECTION, Appellant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Insurer, Treasurer Of The State Of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party. No. SC 85456. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. December 9, 2003. *221 Bradley L. McChesney, St.

Botsford, J. Introduction The plaintiff Barbara Thornton has brought this action for legal malpractice against Kaye, Fialkow, Richmond & Rothstein, a partnership of attorneys, the individual partners of Kaye Fialkow (the partnership and the attorneys are referred to collectively as Kaye Fialkow), another law firm, and its attorneys. Thornton’s claim concerns a lawsuit brought against Thornton and othe

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,

823 F.Supp. 1574 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PEPPER'S STEEL AND ALLOYS, INC.; Florida Power & Light Company; Norton Bloom; Thomas A. Curtis; William Payne; Flora Payne; and Lowell Payne, Defendants. PEPPER'S STEEL AND ALLOYS, INC.; and Norton Bloom, Cross-Plaintiffs, v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Cross-Defendant. Thomas A. CURTIS; William Payne; Flora Payne; and Lowell Payne, Cross-Plaintiffs, v.

638 S.W.2d 950 (1982) UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, et al, Appellants, v. FIBERGLASS SPECIALTIES, INC., Appellee. Nos. 1536, 1537 and 1538. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. August 12, 1982. Rehearing Denied September 9, 1982. *951 Odis Hill, Roberts, Harbour, Smith, Harris, French & Ritter, Longview, for

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

138 Ga. App. 705 (1976) 227 S.E.2d 472 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION v. PEEPLES. 52156. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued May 5, 1976. Decided May 20, 1976. King & Spalding, Samuel W. Calhoun, for appellant. Jack Dorsey, for appellee. WEBB, Judge. Whether the method used by an employee in

Reversing. The appellee, Breaux Ballard, Inc., operates a garage in Louisville, Kentucky, where it stores, services, and repairs automobiles. On January 29, 1943, the appellant, Wilmoth McDonald, brought an action against the appellee to recover damages in the sum of $700 for injuries to her automobile alleged to have been sustained while it was in the custody of the defendant. The plaintiff alleged in her petition that she was the owner of a Dodge automobile of the reasonable value of

The Practice Act abolished forms of action. With its enactment pleading as a system of technical form substantially disappeared. The person claiming redress for legal wrongs done him by another may now state in one complaint all facts material to support his claim, and demand redress for all wrongs that can be legally inferred from the facts stated; subject, where redress is sought upon several causes of action, to the limitations of § 6 of the original Act, and to the discretionary powe

OPINION This is an appeal by Champion from judgment for Ranton for $31,740.86, plus attorneys' fees, in suit on sworn account (and on quantum meruit). Plaintiff Ranton sued defendant Champion for $31,740.86 on sworn account (and on quantum meruit) for repairs made by plaintiff upon 3 oil well rig diesel engines owned by defendant. Defendant answered by general denial and counterclaimed against plaintiff under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act alleging th

McDONALD, J. The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the lapse of a jurisdictional time limitation for commencing suit in a statutory cause of action gives a defendant immunity from suit, such that an interlocutory appeal would be permitted to challenge a decision concluding that the accidental failure of suit statute (savings statute), General Statutes § 52-592,

403 F.Supp.2d 1115 (2005) Brenda L. MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. NORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.05-0499-WS-B. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. December 2, 2005. *1116 *1117 Mark D. Ryan, Bay Minette, AL, for Plaintiff. Charles J. Potts,

McDonald, j. I «.This case involves a dispute between Hartec Corporation (Hartec), Consolidated Waterworks District No. 1 (Waterworks), and GSE Associates, Inc. (GSE) concern*378ing the Terrebonne Parish Schriever Water Plant Expansion project (the project). Waterworks retained the services of GSE to provide professional architectural and engineering services for the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARGARET FOWLER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-634 (RDM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Over the course of the past five plus years, the scope of this case has both narrowed as the Court has granted, in part or in wh

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 26, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0576 Submitted November 15, 2023—Filed February 9, 2024 CHARLENE JORGENSEN and MICHAEL JORGENSEN, Appellees, vs. ADAM B. SMITH, M.D.; ADAM SMITH, M.D., P.C.; and TRI-STATE SPECIALISTS, L.L.P., Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Jeffrey L. Poulson, Judge. A clinic sought interlocutory review of a district court order denyi

IFTIKAR AHMED v. OAK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (SC 20677) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexander and Prescott, Js.* Syllabus The plaintiff employee, A, sought to vacate, and the defendant employer, O Co., a venture capital firm, sought to confirm, an arbitration award of approximately $57 million in damages and fees that was made in connection with a dis

Gupta v. Eli Glob., LLC, 2019 NCBC 39. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE COUNTY OF WAKE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 18 CVS 500057 AJAY GUPTA, Plaintiff, v. ELI GLOBAL, LLC; ELI RESEARCH, INC.; AMERICAN ACADEMY HOLDINGS, LLC; MEDFLOW HOLDINGS, LLC; MDOFFICE ORDER & OPINION ON HOLDINGS, LLC; IO MOTION

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.