Cases

VASQUEZ v. STATE2025 OK CR 1Case Number: D-2021-1249Decided: 01/30/2025DANIEL RAUL SANTIAGO VASQUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee Cite as: 2025 OK CR 1, __ __ OPINION LUMPKIN, PRESIDING JUDGE:

21-6380 Peguero Vasquez v. Garland IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2022 Argued: September 28, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2023 No. 21-6380 ____________________ JO

NAHMIAS, Justice. Appellant Abraham Alonso Alcaraz Vasquez challenges his guilty plea to two counts of malice murder. We affirm. *341On December 1, 2006, Appellant shot his pregnant girlfriend, Jitaan Hornsby, and Adam Rodriguez and Tiffany Smith; only Smith survived. On June 13, 2007, Appellant was indicted in Clayton County on two counts of malice

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Chief Justice Pro Tem:

635 F.3d 563 (2011) Julio VÁSQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 09-2673. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 6, 2010. Decided February 16, 2011. Thomas P. Glynn with whom Allan M. Tow was on brief for petitioner. Tiffany Walters Kleinert, Trial Attorney, with whom Tony West, A

OPINION HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice. ¶ 1 Pursuant to AR.S. §§ 12-1861 to -1867 (2003) and Supreme Court Rule 27, we accepted jurisdiction of two questions certified by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona: 1. Is the recording of an assignment of deed of trust required prior to the filing of a no

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Vasquez, 2012 IL App (2d) 101132 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption SANDRA VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. Second District Docket No. 2-10-1132 Filed June 4, 2012 Held

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 26, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-08-00725-CR <

NUMBER 13-08-00684-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG MARTHA VASQUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 36th District Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TIFFANY ANNE NICHOLSON,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 08-15959 v.  D.C. No. 1:06-cv-00027 HYANNIS AIR SERVICE, INC., DBA Cape Air, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the Un

OSCN Found Document:REECE v. STATE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

OSCN Found Document:REECE v. STATE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Bennett, J.), dated August 17, 2012, which, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition to modify a prior order of custody and visitation of the same court dated November 5, 2008, made on consent of the parties, so as to award him sole legal and physical custody of the subject child. Ordered that

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Bennett, J.), dated August 17, 2012, which, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition to modify a prior order of custody and visitation of the same court dated November 5, 2008, made on consent of the parties, so as to award him sole legal and physical custody of the subject child. Ordered that

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge. . |,Appellant Tiffany Fox appeals the order of the Benton County Circuit Court terminating her parental rights to her son, D.C. 1 Her primary argument on appeal is that the circuit court erred in finding that termination was in the best interest of D.C.; specifically,

261 P.3d 599 (2011) 2011-NMCA-036 STATE of New Mexico, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tiffany BOND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 29,436. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. March 17, 2011. *601 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Andrea Sassa, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee. Chief Public Defend

OPINION AND ORDER KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, assert that Defendant Barnes & Noble, Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., by failing to compensate its Café Managers (“CMs”) for hours worked in excess of forty hours per week. Plaintiffs now move for conditio

STONE, J. We reverse a summary judgment dismissing Tiffany Clark from a forfeiture action under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act (“Act”), sections 932.701-932.704, Florida Statutes. The order determined that she had no rights to possession of $21,000 that she claimed as hers. *1259The summary judgment is based on the trial court’s conclusion that her depositio

OPINION SWANN, Judge. ¶ 1 This is a deficiency action following trustee’s sales of two parcels of real property. The borrower asserted common-law defenses to liability under the promissory notes. The superior court held that, under A.R.S. § 33-811(C), these defenses had been waived and the lender’s successor-in-interest was entitled to summary judgment. We reverse and remand. We hold that common-law defenses