⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Tiffany Elizabeth Martin”

Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021-05-05 · Published · cited 1× · 625 S.W.3d 388; 2021 Ark. App. 208
Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 208 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and DIVISION IV integrity of this document No. CV-20-633 2023.06.27 11:48:13 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 OPINION DELIVERED: MAY 5, 2021 TIFFANY NICOLE ROBINSON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRAWF
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2006-07-20 · Published · cited 3× · 345 B.R. 686; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1373; 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 230
345 B.R. 686 (2006) In re ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISOP OF PORTLAND IN OREGON, and Successors, a Corporation Sole, dba the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, Debtor. Tort Claimants Committee, Plaintiff, v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon, and Successors, a Corporation Sole, dba the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-37154 ELP11, Adversary No. 04-3292. <
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2006-03-09 · Published · cited 3× · 339 B.R. 215; 2006 WL 688270
339 B.R. 215 (2006) In re ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF PORTLAND IN OREGON, and Successors, a Corporation Sole, dba the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, Debtor. No. 04-37154-ELP11. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon. March 9, 2006. *216 *217 *218 Thomas V.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2008-07-14 · Published · cited 32× · 576 F. Supp. 2d 463; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53359; 2008 WL 2755787
576 F.Supp.2d 463 (2008) TIFFANY (NJ) INC. and Tiffany and Company, Plaintiffs, v. EBAY, INC., Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 4607(RJS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 14, 2008. *468 H. Peter Haveles, Jr., Esq. and James B. Swire, Esq. (Eleanor M. Lackman, *469 Esq., and Erik C. Wal
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON FILED APRIL 1998 SESSION January 29, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) No. 02C01-9709-CC-00337
In re Bradleypublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2013-07-16 · Published · cited 15× · 495 B.R. 747; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 2941; 2013 WL 3753559
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON SHOW CAUSE ORDER [Doc. No. 157] JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge. I. Introduction The Court writes this Memorandum Opinion for two reasons: (1) to reiterate • the central importance of professional and ethical conduct in the practice of law; and (2) to inform the debtors’ bar that the undersigned judge has now become sufficiently disenchanted with
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988-10-31 · Published · cited 3× · 103 B.R. 337; 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 2601; 1988 WL 166229
103 B.R. 337 (1988) In re TIFFANY SQUARE ASSOCIATES, LTD., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. A88-02523-MHM. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. October 31, 1988. *338 Stephen C. Greenberg, Joseph Scott Jacobson, Holt, Ney, Zatcoff & Wasserman, Atlanta, Ga., for debtor. Elizabeth Stuhldreher, U.S. Trustee's Off
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996-03-20 · Published · cited 2374× · 470 S.E.2d 177; 196 W. Va. 223; 1996 W. Va. LEXIS 28
470 S.E.2d 177 (1996) 196 W.Va. 223 In the Interest of: TIFFANY MARIE S., Taylor Brook S., Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years Nancy S.E., Appellant, Department of Health and Human Resources, Appellee. No. 23198. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted February 6, 1996. Decided March 20, 1996.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995-11-20 · Published · cited 337× · 71 F.3d 58; 33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1140; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32635; 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,795; 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 507
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: We have before us an employment discrimination case based on pregnancy. Plaintiff alleges that her termination from employment in 1992 at the end of her maternity disability leave was discrimination in violation of Title VII’s Pregnancy Discrimination Act contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Her employer, the defendants, say that plaintiffs discha
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-07-05 · Published · cited 33× · 260 F. Supp. 3d 334
OPINION & ORDER Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge Plaintiffs here are three people with developmental disabilities, each of whom is non-verbal, and each of whom has lived for many years at the “Union Avenue IRA,” a Bronx facility operated by the New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities (“OPWDD”). These plaintiffs — D.K., by her guardian L.K., Z.O., by her guardia
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2020-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 05-MAY-2020 12:14 PM SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX
Hart v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015-07-23 · Published · cited 0× · 774 S.E.2d 833; 2015 WL 4487065
The Defendant-Intervenors' Motion for Supplemental Relief Pursuant to this Court's Writ of Supersedeas is allowed. This Court's 12 December 2014 Order is modified to allow the North Carolina State Education Assistance Authority to release and disburse the funds pursuant to the statutory schedule for the 2015-16 academic year. "By special order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of July 2015."
District Court, S.D. New York · 1998-05-07 · Published · cited 39× · 996 F. Supp. 343; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6639; 1998 WL 234808
996 F.Supp. 343 (1998) Jane Doe, Plaintiff, v. Richard ROSENBERG, M.D., personally, Anne Skomorossky, M.D., personally, Loraine Innes, M.D., personally, Stan Acrow, M.D., personally, Elizabeth Mirabello, M.D., personally, Jane Doe, personally, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, Herbert Pardes, in his official capacity of head of the Department of Psychiatry of Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, Defendants. No. 97
Andrade v. Kuolulupublic domain
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2024-10-24 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 24-OCT-2024 07:56 AM Dkt. 48 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
Andrade v. Kuolulupublic domain
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 26-SEP-2024 02:30 PM Dkt. 32 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 605 U.S. 165
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 1 Pages 165–167 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 22, 2025 REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
OSCAR V. POYDRAS D/B/A * NO. 2025-CA-0206 BROADWAY BAR * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS FOURTH CIRCUIT AND WALLACE C. DRENNAN * INC. STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2022-09-20 · Published · cited 0×
FILED September 20, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963-12-13 · Published · cited 20× · 228 F. Supp. 700; 13 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1546; 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10206
228 F.Supp. 700 (1963) Earl H. TIFFANY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 470-62. United States District Court D. New Jersey. December 13, 1963. *701 Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, by Francis X. McCormick, Elizabeth, N. J., for plaintiff. David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., by Patrick
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2020-11-06 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS WILLIAM C. CARPER, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner November 6, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 19-0820 (BOR Appeal No.2053610) SUPREM