Cases

COOI/EY, J. The prisoner was convicted on an information, charging that he “ did utter and publish as true, a certain false, forged, and counterfeited instrument and writing for the payment of money, in the likeness and similitude of a mortgage” *391of lands. It is objected that the information charges no offense; a mortgage not being among the instruments mentioned i

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARY LOU WALEN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 15-1718 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

685 A.2d 799 (1996) 112 Md. App. 354 F. SCOTT JAY & CO., INC. v. John VARGO, et al. No. 29, September Term, 1996. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 29, 1996. *800 Michael P. Darrow (Hillman, Brown & Darrow, P.A. on the brief) Annapolis, for Appellant. Douglas R. Thomas (Douglas

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

728 A.2d 755 (1999) 126 Md. App. 237 Alan H. PORTER v. Genevieve Yonkers SCHAFFER. No. 773, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 29, 1999. *758 Robert H. Reinhart (Walsh, Walsh & Reinhart, P.C., on the brief), Cumberland, for Appellant. Robert O. Kazary, Cumberland, for

Tilghman C. J. It is now made a question, whether the plaintiff, by his proceedings under the rule of reférence, did not dispense with the entry of special bail. I should hardly have supposed, that such a question would have been made after the case of Moulson v. Reese, 6 Binn. 32, in which, I think, the point was decided. We have not been quite as strict here as in England, with respect to an imp

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Table of Contents I. Facts and Procedural History A. The Alleged Illegal Lending Scheme B. The Separate Class Actions C. Consolidation of the Class Actions D. The Opt-Out Solicitations <

418 F.3d 277 In re: COMMUNITY BANK OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA and Guaranty National Bank of Tallahassee Second Mortgage Loan Litigation.Stephanie Spann; Leonila T. Nini; Eufronio Nini; John Hardt; Robbin Verbeck; Stephanie Hafford; Charles B. Poindexter; Maureen F. Poindexter; David B. Walker; Shundra R. Walker; Jessie Dodd; James Beckius; Linda Whitehead; Lynell B. Wingfield; Jario Ivan Sarrie; Beatriz Sarrie; Michelle K. Morgan; Sharon Finnerty; Do

Breese, J. I dissent in toto from the opinion pronounced by the majority of the court in this case, and will give my reasons therefor, briefly as I may. The case is one of great public importance, as affecting the security of life, and demands the closest scrutiny. A homicide, unexampled in the annals of any country, has been committed in our largest city, under circumstances

Bartley, C. J., delivered the opinion of the court. The assignments of error in this case, present the following questions for determination: *3401st. Whether the district court erred, by admitting evidence on behalf of the State, to prove the statements of a witness (since deceased), given as evidence at a former trial on the same i

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS