Cases

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA TIMOTHY LEE MOORE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D17-2618 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed September 7, 2017.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA TIMOTHY LEE MOORE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-2735 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed September 22, 2016

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT In re: BRYAN MATTHEW DAVIS;  CARLA DENISE BRACEY-DAVIS; MARQUITA E. MOORE, Debtors. TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, and  No. 12-1184 TD BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. BRYAN MATTHEW DAVIS; CARLA DENISE BRACEY-DAVIS; MARQUITA E. MOORE, Defendants-App

1 F.3d 735 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Timothy A. GAYLES, also known as Timothy Moore, also knownas Charles Lee Moore, Appellant. No. 92-3104. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted March 17, 1993.Decided Aug. 25, 1993. C. Peter Erlinder, St. Paul, MN, argued for appellant.</

Lisa White Hardwick, Judge Lamar Moore and Tony Moore (collectively, “the Moores”) appeal from a judgment dismissing their lawsuit against Armed Forces Bank, N.A. The Moores contend the court erred in dismissing Counts II and III of their petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.1 They also contend the court abused its discretion in denying their motion to amend thei

STEELE, Chief Justice: As part of a plea agreement, Kevin Moore agreed to a sentence that included probation and restitution. Restitution was to be quantified “at a later date.” Two months after discharging Moore from probation in an Order reflecting that Moore owed no restitution, the Superior Court ordered specific restitution to parties inconsistent with what Moore had agreed to at sentencing. Several years later, after

CRICHTON, J. This is a direct appeal under La. Const. art. V, § 5 (D) by defendant, Lee Turner, Jr., who was indicted by a grand jury for the first degree murders of Edward Gurtner, III and Randy Chaney, committed while engaged in the perpetration of armed robbery. Following the close of evidence, a jury unanimously found defendant guilty of two counts of first degree murder and, at the

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Eliyahou Harari et al. (Harari) appeals separate decisions of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) in two interferences involving Harari’s U.S. Patent Application No. 09/056,398 ('398 application) and several patents assigned to Micron Technology, Inc. (Micron). 1 In

... , NO.: IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN AUSTIN This document contains so~e pages that ar~ of p~or quahiy (PD-0238-ll: and, WR-80, 739-01 & 02) at the time of 1magmg. ****************************************************** FROM

PER CURIAM. This case comes before the Court on remand from the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Hurst v. Florida, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016) (Hurst v. Florida), following its certiorari review and reversal of our decision in Hurst v. State, 147 So.3d 435 (Fla.2014) (Hurst v. State). In that ease, we affirmed Timothy Lee Hurst’s death sentence, which was im

150 F.Supp.2d 1308 (2001) Andrew P. MOORE II, Plaintiff, v. Harvey E. SCHLESINGER, John E. Steele, Timothy J. Corrigan, Reginald Luster, Charles Truncale, Ralph J. Lee, Maxie Broome, Jr., Earl Johnson, Jr., William J. Henderson, and Egan, Lev & Siwica, Defendants. No. 3:01-cv-108-Orl-31KRS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. June 21, 2001.

*437PER CURIAM. Timothy Lee Hurst appeals his sentence of death that was imposed for the 1998 first-degree murder of Cynthia Harrison. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm his sentence. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Hurst was convicted for the May 2, 1998, first-

*811MERRITT, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent from the court’s ruling on Petitioner Moore’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim arising from the testimony of Dr. Chiappone, discussed under the heading “Claim (2)(B)” of the majority opinion. The majority opinion asserts that this Court is faced with a “novel question stemming fro

BARNES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. On May 23, 2012, Kelcey Horton was stopped at an intersection in Clarks-dale, Mississippi, when he heard a barrage of eight or nine gunshots. He turned to see David “Dae Dae” Moore next to him in a red car. Noticing that his left hand was bleeding, Horton sped off and drove himself to a nearby emergency room. Horton had been s

720 F.Supp.2d 305 (2010) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. David LEE, Kevin P. Cassidy, Edward O'Connor, and Scott Connor, Defendants. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Plaintiff, v. Kevin Cassidy, Edward O'Connor Optionable Inc., David Lee and Robert Moore, Defendants. CMEG NYMEX Inc., Plaintiff, v. Optionable Inc., Kevin Cassidy, Pierpont Capital, Inc., Edward O'Connor, Ridgecrest Capital Inc., and Ma

*373 OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant David Oliver (“Oliver”) appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with the intent to distribute. Oliver was arrested after the police executed a search warrant at his residence and discovered methamphetam

MOORE, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BOYCE F. MARTIN, C.J., MERRITT, SILER, DAUGHTREY, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, JJ., joined. BATCHELDER, J. (pp. 494-505), delivered a separate dissenting opinion, in which BOGGS, ALAN E. NORRIS, and SUHRHEINRICH, JJ, joined. OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. In response to “the growing problem of interstate enforcement of child support,” C

MOORE, Chief Justice (dissenting). In my view the trial court’s failure to give a contributory-negligence instruction constituted reversible error. Therefore, I respectfully dissent from the no-opinion affirmance of the judgment of the trial court. Facts and Procedural History Although suffering from a degree of cerebral palsy and mental retardation, Jeremy Fre

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-3238 ___________ Timothy Moore; Sylvia Moore, * * Appellees, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

330 S.C. 201 (1998) 498 S.E.2d 883 Melvin BUSBY, Bobby Blake, Danny Green, Calvin Rankin, Anthony Simpson, Lee Evans, Ronnie Sullivan, David Capps, Jerry Latimer, Sherman Rider, Rodney T. Arnold, Charles Smith, Freddie Berry, Dale Wright, Eric Sullivan, Charles Lofton, and Timothy Passmore, Applicants, Of whom Melvin Busby, Calvin Rankin, Lee Evans, Sherman W. Rider, Rodney T. Arnold, Charles Lofton are Petitioners, v.