Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Timothy P. Roberts”
Roberts v. Robertspublic domain
Jennifer Tirrell Roberts (wife) appeals the dismissal of her complaint for modification. We affirm. Background. The wife and Timothy Paul Roberts (husband) entered into a separation agreement on January 17, 2013. The agreement provided that it would "be incorporated but not merged into the divorce judgment and shall survive and remain as an independent contract" except for the provisions "dealing with alimony, child support, custody,
State of Missouri v. Timothy Medingpublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED111438 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Cape Girardeau County v. ) Cause No. 20CG-CR0
The People v. Timothy Brewerpublic domain
*274 OPINION OF THE COURT Abdus-Salaam, J. In this case involving the defendant’s sexual abuse of two minor girls, we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion as a matter of law by allowing the People to elicit evidence of the distinctive manner in which he engaged
Timothy Carlos Coffey v. State of Floridapublic domain
ROBERTS, J. The appellant, Timothy Coffey, was charged by amended information with one count of using a computer to facilitate or solicit a parent to consent to the sexual conduct of a child, in violation of section 847.0135(3)(b), Florida Statutes (2013) (Count 1); one count of unlawful use of a two-way communications device, a cellular phone, to facilitate the commission of a
Timothy Moseley v. Paul Kemperpublic domain
KANNE, Circuit Judge. Timothy Moseley was convicted on three counts of possessing nude photos of T.H. that were taken without her consent. Prior to trial, Moseley moved to have the court review T.H.’s mental-health records in camera. At issue here is whether the Wisconsin appellate court’s decision denying that motion is “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of
Inre: Timothy Owenspublic domain
PROST, Circuit Judge. Timothy S. Owens, et al. (“Owens”) appeal a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”), Ex parte Owens, No. 2010-5622 (B.P.A.I. Dec. 1, 2011) (“Board Op”), affirming a rejection of his design patent application, U.S. Design Patent Application No. 29/253,172 (fil
In re: I.P. & Q.P.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA18-366 Filed: 2 October 2018 Pitt County, Nos. 14 JT 103-04 IN THE MATTER OF: I.P. and Q.P., Jr. Appeal by Respondent-Father from orders entered 17 January 2018 by Judge P. Gwynett Hilburn in Pitt County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 13 September 2018. The Graham, Nuckolls, Conner, Law Firm, PLLC, by Timothy E. Heinl
Roberts v. Nealpublic domain
POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of his pro se civil rights suit (see 42 U.S.C. § 1983) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). He is an Illinois prison inmate who had been transferred to the Pinekneyville Correctional Center from the Big Muddy Correctional Center. The defendants are employees of the two prisons — Davis, Doty, Neal, Selb
Roberts v. Glennpublic domain
PERRY, J. We initially accepted review of the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in Glenn v. Roberts, 95 So.3d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding. It is
The People v. Lawrence P. Frumusapublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Fahey, J. For over one hundred years, this Court has applied and refined its holding in People v Molineux (168 NY 264 [1901]). Here, we are presented with a more fundamental question concerning how to identify such propensity evidence in the first instance. We are asked to determine whether the trial court abused its discreti
Grissom v. Robertspublic domain
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Richard Grissom, a prisoner in the custody of the Kansas Department of Corrections, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a number of state corrections and prison officials (collectively the Prison Officials), alleging violation
MEMORANDUM OPINION TRACEY N. WISE, Bankruptcy Judge. This case is about a lake house, and the limited liability company that Debtors formed with two family friends to purchase and manage it. Prior to their bankruptcy, Debtors Mr. and Mrs. Gleason and the VonLehmans formed an LLC to purchase, manage, and share a lake house in Sardinia, Ohio. Debtors contributed a little over half of the lake hou
Susan Lynn Roberts v. Charles Timothy Klingpublic domain
PER CURIAM: In Roberts v. Kling, 104 F.3d 316 (10th Cir.1997), we affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Charles Timothy Kling based on absolute immunity. 1 We reasoned that Kling’s con *711
PARIENTE, J. The issue in this dissolution of marriage case is whether the Fourth District Court of Appeal applied an improper standard of review to the trial court’s factual findings regarding whether a spouse had donative intent to establish that property was an interspousal gift and, therefore, included in the marital estate subject to equitable distribution. Hooker v. Hooker
State v. Robertspublic domain
O’Connor, C.J. {¶ 1} In this appeal, we decide whether the obligation to preserve and catalog criminal-offense-related biological evidence imposed upon certain government entities by R.C. 2933.82 applies to evidence in the possession of those entities at the time of the statute’s effective date. We hold that R.C. 2933.82 is not retr
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Robert Turnerpublic domain
OPINION REILLY, Judge. Appellant Timothy Turner challenges his conviction of criminal defamation, arguing that Minn.Stat. § 609.765 violates First Amendment protections because it is facially overbroad. Because Minn.Stat. § 609.765 is unconstitutionally, overbroad and not susceptible to a narrowing construction, we reverse. FACTS </
Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbinspublic domain
ORDER We have considered both the government’s and petitioners’ responses to the Order to Show Cause dated August 13, 2015, and these submissions have satisfied us that no government attorney provided information to the press with the object of influencing this appeal. Rather, it appears that a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) spo
Roberts v. Stidhampublic domain
19 So.3d 1155 (2009) Laura L. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Edward H. STIDHAM and Debra D. Driskell, Appellees. No. 5D08-3326. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. October 16, 2009. *1156 Timothy S. Babiarz of Babiarz Law Firm, P.A., The Villages, and Bryan S. Gowdy of Mills Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, for App
Susan Lynn Roberts v. Charles Timothy Klingpublic domain
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Susan Lynn Roberts appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant on her civil rights complaint, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She challenges as legal error the district court’s grant of absolute immunity, and alternatively, qualified immunity, to defendant. We hav
Mountain Pure, LLC v. Robertspublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. On March 6, 2013, plaintiff Mountain Pure, LLC, and individual plaintiffs Angela Smith, Gerald Miller, Court Stacks, Kimberly Harbeson, Scott Morgan, Tracy Bush, Quinton Riley, Kadeena DePriest, and William Morris, who are employees of Mountain Pure, filed this action asserting Fourth Amendment claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents o