Cases

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. After the district court 1 denied his motion to suppress evidence, Timothy Hurt entered a conditional plea of guilty to conspiring to manufacture and attempting to manufacture methamphetamine, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), 846, and was sentenced to 120

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-2741 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United v. * States District Court

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-464-CR TIMOTHY RASHON WARNER APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-464-CR TIMOTHY RASHON WARNER APPELLANT V.

OPINION BY JOHN F. FISCHER, PRESIDING JUDGE: ¶ 1 Erin Hart appeals a December 12, 2014 Journal Entry granting her motion for prejudgment interest in this personal injury action. The issue in this case is whether the applicable law is the law in effect when Hart’s suit was filed, or the law in effect when the verdict in Hart’s case was accepted. Hart argues t

JUSTICE McKINNON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Jayson Warner appeals from the denial of his motion to withdraw plea in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County. We affirm. ¶2 The issue presented for review is whether the District Court

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 02-2-05700-2, Ellen J. Fair, J., entered June 5, 2003. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Appelwick and Schindler, JJ.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1)(B), the Court has reviewed the pleadings and other papers herein along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation is accepted and ad

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT STEARNS, District Judge. Plaintiff Michael P. Kenney brought this copyright infringement action against Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc. and Langley Park Pictures (collectively, Warner Brothers), alleging that Warner Brothers’ recent acquisition of the rights to develop a motion picture based on Roger Hobbs’s precocious debut novel “

*733 J. JONES, Chief Justice This case is driven by a dispute about the duration of an administrative suspension of an Idaho driver’s license. Respondent Susan Jane Warner was convicted in Idaho of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). Two years later, she was convicted in Montana on another DUI c

RILEY, Chief Judge. Timothy Skalsky appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Dan Brooks, John Messer, and Independent School District 743, Sauk Centre Public Schools (district), on his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. § 363A.08; and state tor

DECISION PER CURIAM. This case comes before the Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court on appeal of the Trial Court’s Order (Final Judgment) in CV 04-72, dated January 26, 2009. Oral arguments were heard on June 20, 2009, by Chief Justice Mary Jo Hunter, Associate Justice Dennis Funmaker, and Associate Justice Joan Greendeer-Lee. The appellant appeared through her attorney, Timothy Harjo; appellee was rep

125 Wn.2d 876 (1995) 889 P.2d 479 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY WARNER, Respondent. No. 61787-2. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. February 23, 1995. Jim Krider, Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth Aaron Fine, Deputy, for appellant. *880 Lovie L. Bernardi of

PER CURIAM. This appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Johnson v. First City Bank of Gainesville, 491 So.2d 1217, 1218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). In light of the dismissal, all pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

296 B.R. 501 (2003) In the Matter of Sarah Jane WARNER, Debtor. Sarah Jane Warner, Plaintiff, v. Educational Credit Management Corporation, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02-81169, Adversary No. 02-08036. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska. June 19, 2003. *502 Richard Register, Register Law Office, Fremont, NE, for debtor

JUSTICE COTTER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Timothy Faber (Faber) appeals his conviction in the Tenth Judicial District, Fergus County, for felony driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), fourth or subsequent offense. We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

MINER, Judge. Timothy Warner and William Warner petition for certiorari review of an order awarding and denying attorney’s fees to court-appointed counsel. See Jenkins v. Escambia County, 614 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)(“The proper vehicle for challenging an order awarding attorney’s fees to court-appointed counsel is a petition for certiorari.”). Finding merit in petitioner’s arguments, we grant the petition.

PER CURIAM. Petitioners, defendants below, seek cer-tiorari review of two non-final orders compelling discovery in an action to enforce the non-compete provisions of an employment agreement. 1 The lawsuit was filed after the individual defendant, Timothy Ryan, terminated his employment with the plaintiff and went to wor

704 F.Supp.2d 460 (2010) WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeremy WALKER, Defendant. C.A. No. 07-287 Erie. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 31, 2010. *461 Eve G. Burton, Timothy M. Reynolds, Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Denver, CO, Geoffrey L. Beauchamp, Geoffrey L. Beauchamp, P.C., Willow G