Cases

LEE, P.J., for the Court. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 1. Phillip Shores and his wife, Lynn, were employed by Total Transportation, Inc., of Mississippi (Total) as an over-the-road trucking team. On January 16, 2003, the couple picked up a load in Sunnyside, Washington, and headed towards Jackson, Mississippi, to deliver the load. While on the road, the Shores began having trouble with t

775 N.W.2d 270 (2009) 2009 WI App 145 Lori L. MAYPARK, Mary Pat Geddes and Marcia Lynn See, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Troy C. Schmidt and Polaris Industries, Inc., Defendants. Lisa Christenson, Shannon Aubart, Amelia Cran, Tina M. Dixon, Julie J. Gross, Brenda Johnston and Tami L. *271 Majewski, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

By order of the Supreme Court of Texas, former Chief Justice John G. Hill was assigned to this case pursuant to section75.003 of the Texas Government Code.2 Shortly after being notified of Justice Hill's assignment, and before oral argument, Matlock objected to Justice Hill's participation in the case pursuant to section 74.053(b) of the Texas Government Code. There

948 S.W.2d 308 (1997) Karryn MATLOCK, Appellant, v. John McCORMICK, Individually, and as Alter Ego of Dallas Nightclub, and Tina Wheeldon, Individually, and as Alter Ego of Associated Club Management, Appellees. No. 04-96-00052-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. April 30, 1997. *309 Daniel R. Rutherford, Law offices of D

350 S.W.3d 460 (2011) Christopher Paul SCHWERMER, Respondent, v. Amanda Lynn SCHWERMER, Appellant. No. WD 73685. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. October 4, 2011. Tina M. Luper, for Respondent. John H. Edmiston, for Appellant. Before Division Three: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge.

Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN. PAEZ, Circuit Judge. In 1997, Plaintiffs filed this action against Boeing North America,- Inc. and Rockwell' International Corporation (“Defendants”), alleging that hazardous radioactive and non-radioactive substances released from four nuclear and rocket testing facilities (the “Rocketdyne facilities”) caused their la

</

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-377-CV KB HOME MORTGAGE COMPANY APPELLANT V. JONATHAN AND KRISTI WILLIAMS

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court William M. Luce, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated natural persons, Plaintiff, v. Lexington County Health Services District, Inc., Brian D. Smith, in both his official and individual capacities; and Lynn Coggins, in both her official and individual capacities, Defendants. Appellate Case No. 2024-001240 CERTIFIED QUESTION ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE

666 S.E.2d 171 (2008) Michael W. PATRICK, Guardian Ad Litem and Guardian of the Estate of J.D., Minor Child, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant. No. COA07-1515. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 16, 2008. *172 Holtkamp Law Firm, by Lynne M. Holtkamp, Chapel Hill, for Plaint

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS DUSTY RAY PAINTER, § INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF DEZARAY NICOLE SPEER § No. 08-07-00112-CV AND SUMMER DAWN PAINTER, MINORS, AND TINA PERKINS, § Appeal from the INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE

Opinion of the Court by WATANABE, J. The primary issue in this appeal is whether PlaintiffiCounterclaim DefendanL-Appel-lant Angelo Pelosi (Pelosi) is entitled to a mandatory injunction requiring the removal *524of a roadway and tennis court that were constructed on Lot 29 of the Maui Meadows III (MM III) Subdivision, in clear violation of an MM III re

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS DUSTY RAY PAINTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF DEZARAY NICOLE SPEER AND SUMMER DAWN PAINTER, MINORS, AND TINA PERKINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JESSE PERKINS, DECEASED, Appellants, v.

630 F.Supp.2d 741 (2009) Tina M. RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, v. DIMENSION FILMS et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-08-1836. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 17, 2009. *743 Leslie Wm. Adams, Attorney at Law, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Tanya Lynn Chaney, Locke Lord Bissell and Liddell LLP, H

STEPHENS, Judge. Defendant North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”) appeals the North Carolina Industrial Commission’s order denying DHHS’s motion to dismiss an action brought by J.D., through her guardian ad litem Michael Patrick (“Plaintiff’), pursuant to the North Carolina State Tort Claims Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 143-291 to -300.1A (2007). DHHS asserts that Plaintiff’s claim is barred by pub

634 F.Supp.2d 779 (2009) Tina M. RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, v. DIMENSION FILMS et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-08-1836. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. June 29, 2009. *784 Leslie W.M. Adams, Attorney at Law, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Tanya Lynn Chaney, Locke Lord Bissell and Liddell LLP, Hous

* * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission has reviewed the prior order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Full Commission AFFIRMS the order of the Deputy Commissioner. * * * * * * * * * * *

985 P.2d 1045 (1999) 91 Hawai`i 478 Angelo PELOSI, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant, v. WAILEA RANCH ESTATES, a Hawai`i general partnership, John Kean, Stephen Pitt, Satish Gholkar, Eduardo F. Bello, Hugh Jeffrey Farrington and Stephen K. Rink, Deceased, Defendants-Respondents-Appellees, Stephen M. Swanson, Louise S. Swanson, Margaret S. Smith, Batte T.L. Smith, Nahbut L. Smith, Peter Tucker

704 F.Supp. 1570 (1989) Tamara L. GREER, etc., Plaintiff, v. SKILCRAFT, et al., Defendants. John S. KIRKPATRICK, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN MOTORS CORP., et al., Defendants. Ashley Victoria Barnett, etc., Plaintiff, v. MTD PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant. Nos. CV 88-P-2152-S, CV 88-P-2188-S, CV 88-P-2192-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, S.D. January

893 A.2d 99 (2006) In re: PAXSON TRUST I Appeal of: P.M.P. & R.P., Appellants. In re: Paxson Trust I Appeal of: J.P., Appellant. In re: Paxson Trust I Appeal of: P.L.P., Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 28, 2004. Filed January 27, 2006. *104 Martin J. King, Newtown, for P.M.P. & R.P.