Cases

Matter of Tina X. v Thomas Y. (2024 NY Slip Op 06391) Matter of Tina X. v Thomas Y. 2024 NY Slip Op 06391 Decided on December 19, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1377 TINA SMITH, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ROBERT FARNSWORTH, Plaintiff, v. CSRA; MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Defendants – Appellees, and GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Defendant.

ALOK AHUJA, Judge. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denied workers’ compensation benefits to the dependents of Mauro Bri-*819to-Pacheco, who was murdered by a robber on August 10, 2009, while working at Tina’s Hair Salon in Kansas City. The Commission found that the Salon was not Brito-Pacheco’s statutory employer under § 287.040.1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2021 Term FILED June 2, 2021 released at 3:00 p.m. _____________________ EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC19-704 ____________ TINA LASONYA BROWN, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________ No. SC19-141

Appeal by the mother from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Barbara Salinitro, J.), dated May 6, 2015. The order, after a combined permanency and disposi-tional hearing, inter alia, placed the subject child in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services and placed the mother under supervision by a child protective agency, social services official, or duly authorized agency until the

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 263 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document DIVISION II 2023.06.27 15:21:32 -05'00' No. CV-20-521 2023.001.20174 Opinion Delivered May 26, 2021 VICTORIA ALLEN, TINA PANKEY, AND DONALD LONG APPEAL FROM THE RAN

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #049 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 25th day of October, 2024 are as follows: BY Crichton, J.: 2024-C-00500 LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS IN THE MATTER OF MICHELLE BARNETT REVERSED. SEE OPINION. Crain, J., concurs. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

ACCEPTED 03-15-00324-CV 8023218 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00685-CV William Andrew Allen, Appellant v. Tina Marie Bauer Allen, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 241,128-D, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 6, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GREGORY NELSON AND TINA NELSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 9132 Joseph H. Walker, III, Judge _______________________ No. W2014-00494-CCA-R3-CD (C) - Filed May 5, 2015

HILL, Circuit Judge: There are three appeals before us in this case. In the first, Tina Griffith appeals the judgment against her in her action against General Motors for damages for injuries she sustained as the result of an alleged automotive design defect. In a related but separately filed case, she appeals the denial of her post-trial motions for relief from judgment and for

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00297-CV Henry Hutcherson III, Appellant v. Tina Hutcherson, Appellee FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY NO. CV40919, THE HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION B

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 25, 2014 Session RICHARD JEREMIAH GARRETT, JR. v. RENEE MICHELLE ELMORE Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Montgomery County No. MC-JV-PL-CV-11-003779 Wayne C. Shelton, Judge No. M2013-01564-COA-R3-JV - Filed July 29, 2014 The father of the parties’ four-year-old child appeals the permanent parenting plan establi

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 2, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Spain, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (Tobin, J.), entered May 28, 1996, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, to find respondent in violation of a prior order of protection. An order of protection was issued by Family Court in favor of petitioner on March 26, 1996, wherein respondent was directed to “stay away from” petitione

MICHELLE MARTIN V. CHARLES KIRTLAND NO. 07-07-0291-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 21, 2007 ______________________________ MICHELLE MARTIN, APPELLAN

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING (Court composed of Judge JAMES F. McKAY III, Judge TERRI F. LOVE, Judge DANIEL L. DYSART). TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. |,Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. f/k/a Lincoln Big Three, Inc. and Air Liquide America L.P. f/k/a Air Liquide America Corporation’s (“AL”) application for rehearing is granted solely for clarification. This Court’s original opinion failed to indica

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Dickens Etienne, Petitioner v. Case No. 18-cv-1156-SM Opinion No. 2023 DNH 138 Michelle Edmark, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison, Respondent O R D E R On January 28, 2004, Dickens Etienne shot an acquaintance, Larry Lemieux, in the back of the head. Lemieux died al

2 So.3d 541 (2008) Michelle MARSHALL, individually and on behalf of her MINOR CHILDREN, Aaliyah Jamison, Brandi Marshall, and Jeremy Roberts, Dorothy Jones, Jim Adams, and Tina Andrews individually and on behalf of her Minor Children, et al. v. AIR LIQUIDE-BIG THREE, INC., Air Liquide Corporation, Air Liquide America, L.P., Global Lime Calciner of Louisiana, Inc., Global Lime, LLC, David Bergeron, and E. Roy Baggett. No. 200