Cases

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Marilyn Kelly Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No.-58) Hon. Jams L. Sammartino, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is Defendants Bridgepoint Education, Inc., Andrew S. Clark, and Daniel J. Devine’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“MTD,” ECF No. 58). Also before the Court are Lead Plaintiffs’ R

MANION, Circuit Judge. Titan Tire Corporation of Freeport, Inc. (“Titan”), purchased a tire manufacturing facility in Freeport, Illinois, in late December 2005. In January 2006, Titan entered into a series of labor agreements with Local 745, the union which represented the Titan workers. After taking over the Freeport facility, Titan paid the full union salaries of Local 745’s President and Benefit Representative even though

*522 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER DOMINIC J. SQUATRITO, District Judge. The Plaintiff, Greg V. Johnson (“Johnson”), brings this diversity action against the Defendant, Walden University, Inc. (‘Walden”), raising claims of fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On May 22, 2014, ScripsAmerica, Inc. (“Scrips”) filed this action against Iron-ridge Global LLC d/b/a Ironridge Global IV, Ltd., John Kirkland, and Brendan O’Neil (collectively “Ironridge”), as well as certain fictitious defendants.1 The complaint alleges, claims for securities fraud, br

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: This is an action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”). Supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 is as

726 F.Supp.2d 604 (2010) MICROAIRE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ARTHREX, INC., Defendant. Case No. 3:09-cv-00078. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. June 3, 2010. *610 Michael Edward Whitham, Philana Shell Handler, Robert Neal Cook, Whitham, Curtis & Christofferson & Cook, P

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Before the Court is defendant Stephen F. Austin State University’s consolidated motion to dismiss the complaint and motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 34. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion for summary judgment is DENIED. BACKGROUND The facts, viewed m

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Marilyn Kelly Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NEURVANA MEDICAL, LLC, a ) Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0034-KSJM ) BALT USA, LLC, a Delaware limited ) liability company, BALT ) INTERNATIONA

(2008) UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS and Kansas Athletics, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Larry SINKS, Clark Orth, Larry Sinks Enterprises, Inc. and Victory Sportswear, L.L.C. (collectively d/b/a/ Joe-College.com), Defendants. No. 06-2341-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 19, 2008. Opinion Denying Reconsideration May 13, 2008. MEMORANDUM

Memorandum Opinion CRAIG A. GARGOTTA, Bankruptcy Judge. On June 29 through July 2, 2009, came on for trial the above-styled and numbered adversary proceeding.1 After the trial the Court took the matter under advisement. After review of the evidence and arguments, the Court now issues this Memorandum Opinion, as its written findings of fact and conclusions of law as

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ROBERT J. SHELBY, District Judge. On June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision holding that “genes and the information they encode are not patent eligible simply because they have been isolated from the surrounding genetic material.” Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad, Genetics, Inc. (A

Baylson, District Judge I. Introduction...435 II. Factual Background...436 (A) The Parties...436 (B) The Bid Process...436 (C) Reaching the Terms of the Management Agreement...438 (D) Freshman Enrollment Declines...440 (E) Sodexo Misses Profit Projections...441 (F) Contract Termination...441 III. Mo

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: FACEBOOK, INC. No. 22-15077 SECURITIES LITIGATION, ______________________________ D.C. No. 5:18-cv- 01725-EJD AMALGAMATED BANK, Lead Plaintiff; PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ORDER AND MISSISSIPPI; JAMES KACOURIS, AMENDED individually and on behalf of all others

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: FACEBOOK, INC. No. 22-15077 SECURITIES LITIGATION, ______________________________ D.C. No. 5:18-cv- 01725-EJD AMALGAMATED BANK, Lead Plaintiff; PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OPINION MISSISSIPPI; JAMES KACOURIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge Blue Book Services gathers information about the produce industry and sells that information to subscribers. In July 2016, Blue Book discovered, much to its surprise, that its entire proprietary database of members-only credit rating information had been downloaded and publicly posted to an unaffiliated website. R. 58, PSOF ¶¶ 1, 5, 52, 21-23.1 Afte

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra