Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Todd Allen Marquette”
Marquette v. Prochazkapublic domain
TODD, Justice. Susan Marquette, a 2-year-old child, was injured when struck by an automobile driven by William Prochazka. At trial, Susan was held not negligent as a matter of law, and the issue of parental negligence was not submitted to the jury. The trial court, however, refused a request to affirmatively instruct the jury that neither Susan nor her parents were contributorily negligent. The jury found Prochazka not neglige
Allen v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.public domain
748 F.Supp.2d 323 (2010) Alice H. ALLEN and Laurance E. Allen, d/b/a Al-Lens Farm, and Garret Sitts and Ralph Sitts, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC., Dairy Marketing Services, LLC, Dean Foods Company, and HP Hood LLC, Defendants. Case No. 5:09-cv-230. United States District Court, D. Vermont. August 30, 20
In re ASPC Corp.public domain
John E. Hoffman, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction This case pits Chapter 11 debtor ASPC Corp. (the "Debtor") and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the "Committee") against firearms manufacturer Smith & Wesson Corp. ("S & W") and one of S & W's distributors, Ellett Brothers, LLC ("Ellett"). Earlier in the case, Ellett entered into an asset purchase agreemen
Valdez v. Pringlepublic domain
143 P.3d 1069 (2005) Mark VALDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Debbie J. PRINGLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04CA1210. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I. December 29, 2005. Certiorari Granted October 16, 2006. *1071 Roberts Levin & Patterson, P.C., Bradley A. Levin, Denver, Colorado; Caplis & Scipione, LLC, Danie
Stupak-Thrall v. Glickmanpublic domain
988 F.Supp. 1055 (1997) Kathy STUPAK-THRALL; Michael A. Gajewski; and Bodil Gajewski, Plaintiffs, v. Daniel GLICKMAN, Secretary of Agriculture; Michael P. Dombeck, Chief of the United States Forest Service; Bob Jacobs, Regional Forester for Region IX of the United States Forest Service; Phyllis Green, Forest Supervisor of the Ottawa national Forest; and the United States Forest Service; Defendants. No. 2:96-CV-054.
Gross v. Hale-Halsell Co.public domain
554 F.3d 870 (2009) Dale GROSS; James Bagwill; Laveta Barker; Billy Barnes; Jim Bennett; Roy Bergeron; Kenneth Bevenue; Cody Calico; Helen Capehart; Alma Cheshewalla; Raymond Cody; O W Collins; Chris Couch; Samuel Dobson; Gina Doss; Jason Drake; Allen Farrier; Kelly Fetzer; Eugene Fitzpatrick; Billy Gambling; Eros Garcia; Christopher Green; Wade Green; Mikey Grider; James Grisham; Tim Hansen; Darrin Hargis; Anthony Hayes; Paul Henry; Mark Hicks; Rhonda H
Alvin L. Phipps v. Guaranty Natl. Bankpublic domain
RILEY, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs, Alvin and Linda Phipps (Phipps), John and Elizabeth St. Clair (St. Clair), and Shawn and Lorene Starkey (Starkey) filed a putative class action lawsuit in Missouri state court, seeking to recover allegedly unlawful fees charged on second mortgage loans by Guaranty National Bank of Tallahassee (GNBT). GNBT and other defendants removed to
No. 03-3423public domain
417 F.3d 1006 Alvin L. PHIPPS; Linda L. Phipps; John A. St. Clair; Elizabeth R. St. Clair; Shawn V. Starkey; Lorene A. Starkey, Appellants,v.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION; GMAC-Residential Funding Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation; Residential Funding Mortgage Securities II, Inc., a Minnesota corporation; Chase Manhattan Bank, as Indenture Trustee of the GMAC-RFC and RFMS Securitized Trusts; Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner T
Champagne v. Celotex Corp.public domain
599 So.2d 1086 (1992) Homer CHAMPAGNE, et al. v. CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al. No. 91-C-2571. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 28, 1992. Robert E. Kerrigan, Jr., A. Wendel Stout, III, Janet L. MacDonell, Marc J. Yellin, and Gary B. Roth, Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, for applicant. *1087 William B. Baggett, Wil
People v. Westpublic domain
SECOND DIVISION July 14, 1998 No. 1-97-0896 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Cook County. ) v. ) )
People v. Westpublic domain
697 N.E.2d 1216 (1998) 298 Ill. App.3d 58 232 Ill.Dec. 286 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith WEST, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-97-0896. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. July 14, 1998. *1218 Rita A. Fry, Public Defender of C
Keith Bowles v. Harry Russell, Wardenpublic domain
OPINION BOGGS, Chief Judge. This is a case about missed deadlines. At times, they go unnoticed, but sometimes the lapse is fatal. This case presents one of the fatal variety. Petitioner Keith Bowles failed to receive timely notice of the district court’s ruling that triggered his appeal period. When he did receive notice, he correctly sought relief under
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Martinpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Diane A. Lebedeff, J. With great frequency, courts are presented with summary judgment motions by credit card issuers seeking a balance due from credit card holders which motions fail to meet essential standards of proof and form in one or more particulars (Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067 [1979] [“To obtain summary judgment it is necessary that t
Bowles v. Russellpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0487p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X
Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Weirpublic domain
Cooley, C. J. The manner in which this case is submitted makes the record present substantially this question: Whether in the court below there was any evidence tending to prove the plaintiff’s case? The action was begun in justices’ court, and the declaration is as follows: “Saginaw County — ss. John B. Weir, plaintiff herein, complains of the Flint and Pere Marquette Railway Company, defendant herein
Stupak-Thrall v. United Statespublic domain
BOGGS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. That this case has been controversial is apparent from its effect of splitting our court right down the middle. That at times it involves intricate statutory analysis also cannot be gainsaid. However, as I shall endeavor to demonstrate, it is basically a very simple case.1 By their interpretation of a statutory phrase embodying an obvious legislative
McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION HUVELLE, District Judge. In General Telephone Co. v. Falcon,1 the Supreme Court ruled that “a Title VII class action, like any other class action, may only be certified if the trial court is satisfied, after a rigorous analysis, that the prerequisites of Rule 23[] have been satisfied.” Id. at 161, 102 S.Ct. 2364
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MACOMB INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT, FOR PUBLICATION ALGONAC COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, BAY April 10, 2026 ARENAC ISD, BIRCH RUN AREA SCHOOLS, 1:39 PM EASTERN UPPER PENINSULA INTERM
Mabray v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.public domain
480 F.Supp. 1240 (1979) Joyce Ruth Fox MABRAY, Plaintiff, v. VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP., City of Memphis, Betty Schettler, M.D., and John Dacus, M.D., Defendants. No. 79-2420. United States District Court, W. D. Tennessee, W. D. December 4, 1979. *1241 *1242 Ben Todd, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintif
Wolpert v. Fosterpublic domain
254 N.W.2d 348 (1977) Herschel WOLPERT, Individually and d.b.a. Sales Enterprises, Respondent, v. Charles R. FOSTER, et al., Appellants. No. 46556. Supreme Court of Minnesota. April 15, 1977. *349 Nielsen, Blackburn & Merritt and Steven J. Tierney, Minneapolis, for appellants. Maslon Kaplan Edelman Borman Brand & M