Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Todd Franklin Manley”
Todd v. Chavianopublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
State of Missouri v. Todd Fonvillepublic domain
LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge. Todd Fonville appeals from his convictions for first-degree murder, second-degree murder, two counts of armed criminal action, leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident, and knowingly burning. He contends the circuit court erred in giving the jury a non-approved instruction on partial verdicts instead of the hammer instruction after the jury informe
Bartchy v. State Board of Educationpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 351 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 352 {¶ 1} Appellants, Joann and Richard Bartchy, Donna and Robert Salmon, Marilyn and Bernard Schlake, and B
Kelley v. the Statepublic domain
Boggs, Judge. Terry Kelley appeals following the trial court’s grant of the State’s “Motion to Set Aside an Illegal Judgment.” The court granted the motion on the basis that it was without authority to sentence Kelley to a lesser sentence than that recommended by the State as part of a negotiated plea to a reduced charge. Because the trial court erred in granting the State’s mot
Bartchy v. State Board of Educationpublic domain
Cupp, J., dissenting. {¶ 99} The difference in the outcome of this case between the opinion of the court of appeals and the opinion of the majority of this court hinges on whether the responses by the Cincinnati Public School District (“CPSD”) to the questions posed at Ohio Adm.Code 3301-89-02(B)(9) and (10) amount, without further facts and explanation, to reliable, probative, and substantial evidence. The cour
Brendamour v. Indian Hill City Councilpublic domain
[Cite as Brendamour v. Indian Hill City Council, 2021-Ohio-568.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO DOUGLAS BRENDAMOUR, : APPEAL NOS. C-200023 C-200026 BETH BRENDAMOUR, : TRIAL NOS. A-1705094
Chester/12, Ltd. v. Epiq Constr. Servs., Inc.public domain
[Cite as Chester/12, Ltd. v. Epiq Constr. Servs., Inc., 2023-Ohio-1886.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CHESTER/12 LTD., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : Nos. 111626 and 112198 v.
Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-12.] `IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO SAMUEL VOSS, : APPEAL NO. C-230065 TRIAL NO. A-2002899 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. :
State v. Staleypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Staley, 2021-Ohio-3086.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NOS. C-200270 C-200271 Plaintiff-Appellee, : C-200272 TRIAL NOS. 19CRB-19555A vs.
Smith v. Cleveland Clinicpublic domain
Eileen A. Gallagher, Judge. {¶ 1} Appellants appeal an interlocutory order denying a motion for a protective order. Defendants-appellants Community Health Partners, Community Health Partners of Ohio, Community Health Partners Regional Health System, Community Health Partners Regional Medical Center, and Eli White (hereinafter collecti
Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C.public domain
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C., Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-531.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typ
Waste Servs. of Decatur, LLC v. Decatur Cnty.public domain
S. THOMAS ANDERSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Decatur County, Tennessee's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47) filed on February 8, 2018. Plaintiff Waste Services of Decatur, LLC has responded in opposition, and Defendant has filed a reply. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED . BACKGROUND This i
RENDERED: JUNE 25, 2026 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2024-SC-0228-DG ANDY BESHEAR, IN HIS OFFICIAL APPELLANTS CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY; AND DAVID KAREM, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH ETHICS COMMISSION ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V.
Portfolio Recovery Assocs., L.L.C. v. VanLeeuwenpublic domain
[Cite as Portfolio Recovery Assocs., L.L.C. v. VanLeeuwen, 2016-Ohio-2962.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY PORTFOLIO RECOVERY : ASSOCIATES, LLC : Appellate Case No. 26692 : Plaintiff-Appellee
In Re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
467 F.Supp.2d 256 (2006) In re ZYPREXA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: All Actions. No. 04-MD-1596 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 5, 2006. *257 *258 Michael A. London, Douglas & London, Christopher A. Seeger, Mitchell M. Breit, Milberg Wei
Johnson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND AND GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. This is an employment compensation putative class action “aris[ing, in Plaintiffs’ view] out of [Hewlett-Packard’s (“HP”)] acknowledged failures over the past several years to record timely and accurately the sales of its equipment and services; and to calculate properly, and pay ti
United States v. Farhanepublic domain
Judge RAGGI concurs in part in a separate opinion. Judge DEARIE dissents in part in a separate opinion. REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge: I. Background...............................................................132 A. 2001: The Initial FBI Investigation into Co-Defendant Tank Shah..........132 B. 2001: Shah Offers to Support al Qae
Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.public domain
570 F.Supp. 1217 (1983) SUGARHILL RECORDS LTD., Plaintiff, v. MOTOWN RECORD CORPORATION, MCA Distributing Corp., and Rick James, Defendants. No. 83 Civ. 6176(SWK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 7, 1983. *1218 Krieger, Ferrara, Flynn & Catalina by Harold Krieger, New York City, for plaintiff. Fi
City of Dallas, Texas v. Willis, Kevin Michaelpublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
City of Dallas, Texas v. Arredondo, Anthonypublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM