Cases

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court decree foreclosing mortgages it held on properties and ordering the sale of the properties subject to one defendant’s lease, contending the trial court erred in finding the leasehold to be superior to plaintiff’s mortgage and in permitting a defendant to amend its answer to conform to proof. The appeal is dismissed due to appellant’s waiver of its right to appeal.

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A02-1411-PL-812 MASSA, Justice. Three central Indiana Toyota dealerships protested the relocation of a fourth Toyota dealership. The Auto Dealer Services Division dismissed their action for lack of standing — affirmed by the trial court — concluding the dealerships were outside the “relevant m

The effect of the pleadings in this case made it an action sounding in negligence whereby the defendant was chargeable with the deposit of great quantities of earth in navigable water, so that a pond for carp on the land of the plaintiffs, and the navigation of an approach to the plaintiffs' premises, were averred to be destroyed, so that the value of the plaintiffs' land was greatly diminished. At the close of the testimony on the part of the plaintiffs, the defendant offered no evidence, bu

Attorneys for Appellants Attorneys for Appellees Geoffrey M. Grodner Gregory F. Zoeller Kendra G. Gjerdingen Attorney General of Indiana Mallor Grodner LLP Bloomington, Indiana Kyle Hunter Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

February 15, 2022 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 287 341 Conn. 793 FEBRUARY, 2022 793 State v. Lopez STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RAMON LOPEZ (SC 20601) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js.

197 S.W.3d 505 (2006) Louise HOWELL, Appellant, v. Darrell A. HERALD, Executor of the Estate of John R. Turner, Appellee. No. 2003-SC-000476-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. February 23, 2006. As Modified February 24, 2006. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 24, 2006. *506 Kif Harward Skidmo

NAJAM, Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Andy Mohr West, Inc. d/b/a Andy Mohr Toyota (Andy Mohr), Butler Motors, *706Inc. d/b/a Butler Toyota (Butler), and TW Toy, Inc. d/b/a Tom Wood Toyota (Tom Wood) (collectively, the Dealers) appeal the trial court’s judgment affirming the dismissal of declaratory judgment actions the Dealers had filed with the

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles Hsin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to set aside the entry of a default against him and the subsequent entry of default judgment. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find no abuse of discretion and no

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

NICHOLSON, J.* *598Defendants Karre Mullins and Arturo Russell were convicted by jury of robbery involving bank customers at ATM's. Defendant Mullins was also convicted on a count of conspiracy to commit petty theft. Sentenced to determinate terms, defendants appeal. On appeal, they argue: (1) the evidence was insuf

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RICHARD EVANS (SC 21006) Mullins, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Ecker, Dannehy and Bright, Js. Syllabus Convicted of murder and carrying a pistol without a permit in connection with the shooting death of the victim, the defendant appealed to this court. The defendant claimed that the trial court had improperly admitted the testimony of a lay witness, M, concerning his identifica

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND RELATED RELIEF Mark X. Mullin, United States Bankruptcy Judge On April 3, 4,10, and 11, 2017, the Court held a trial on Plaintiff Victor Bernal’s specific performance cause of action against DK8 LLC (“DK8”) and HBT Land, LLC (“HBT Land”), as well as those portions of Bernal’s breach-of-contract and declaratory-judgment causes of action

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Gregory F. Young pled guilty to one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. He challenges his sentence on appeal, asserting that the court procedurally erred by relying on a clearly erroneous fact and by incorrectly applying guidelines commentary when determining his sentence. We affirm. I. In 2007, Young was convicted of two counts of burglary in I

HARPER, J. The defendant, Danovan T., appeals from his conviction of two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). In this appeal, he argues that his conviction should be reversed because (1) certain improprieties by the prosecutor deprived him of his general due process right to a fair trial and (2) the trial court improperly restricted his r

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TIFFANY DUDLEK, ) ) Employee-Appellant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N23A-12-005 SPL ) JOVIE CHILDCARE ) REIMAGINED, ) ) Employer-Appellee. ) Submitte

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-0574 Filed July 22, 2020 M.W., on behalf of B.W., Petitioner-Appellant, vs. J.W., Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Jason D. Besler, Judge. M.W. appeals the denial of a protective order under Iowa Code chapter 236A (2019). AFFIRM

WIND COLEBROOK SOUTH, LLC v. TOWN OF COLEBROOK (SC 20594) Robinson, C. J., and D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 12-64 (a)), the following property, if not exempted, shall be taxed as real property: ‘‘Dwelling houses, garages, barns, sheds, stores, shops, mills, buildings used for business, commercial, financial, manufacturing, mercantile and trading purposes,