Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 4, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JANET MICHELLE STANFIELD, TONY ALAN WINSETT and JUSTIN BRADLEY STANFIELD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Obion County No. CC-15-CR-84 Jeff Parham, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2015-02503-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 31, 2017

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Steven Roche, Plaintiff Below, Petitioner FILED January 5, 2018 vs) No. 16-1031 (Monroe County 14-C-75) EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT O

ORME, Judge: ¶1 TNE Limited Partnership appeals an adverse district court ruling regarding the validity of a contract in its suit against Nick Muir, The Muir Second Family Limited Partnership (the Muir Partnership), and Witting-ham LLC, the most recent successor to the Muir Partnership. The contract, which purported to bind the Muir Partnership, was signed by its putative genera

616 F.3d 632 (2010) MARSHALL JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.D., by and through his parents, BRIAN and Traci D., Defendant-Appellee. Traci and Brian D., as parents of and on behalf of their minor child C.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Marshall Joint School District No. 2, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-1319, 09-2499. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

WYNN, Circuit Judge: Each of the five Plaintiffs in this matter brought a putative class action alleging that between 2009 and 2014 certain lenders participated in "kickback schemes" prohibited by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"), 12 U.S.C. § 2601

SHER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; the Paul L. Garcell and Pamela Hertz Revocable Family Trust, Paul L. Garcell and Pamela Hertz, Trustees; the Joseph D. Eystad and Mary Ann Arminio Revocable Trust Dated 09/03/03, Maryann Arminio and Joseph D. Eystad, Trustees; the Frank Arminio and Mary Arminio Revocable Living Trust, Mary Arminio, Trustee; Angelo John Arminio, an Individual; Paula M. Arminio, an Individual; Andrea Deanean Glenn, an I

OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: This appeal analyzes whether the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it concluded that, according to tribal law, it had no authority to intervene in a tribal membership dispute, in which more than 150 people were disenrolled from the Pala Band of Mission Indians (Pala Band or Band). W

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DESERT LAND LOAN ACQUISITION, No. 76934 LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; DESERT LAND, LLC, A NEBADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; HOWARD BULLOCH, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID GAFFIN, AN INDIVIDUAL; THE HOWARD AND CRISTI BULLOCH FAMILY TRUST DATED 09/14/1995; ME HOWA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DESERT LAND LOAN ACQUISITION, No. 76934 LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; DESERT LAND, LLC, A NEBADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; HOWARD BULLOCH, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID GAFFIN, AN INDIVIDUAL; THE HOWARD AND CRISTI BULLOCH FAMILY TRUST DATED 09/14/1995; ME HOWA

McMILLIN, C.J., for the Court. ¶ 1. This is a custody case concerning a young child whose father is deceased. The chancellor found that the child’s mother was unfit to have primary custody of the child and, instead, awarded custody to the child’s paternal aunt. In addition to the natural mother’s efforts to have custody of the child, the child’s maternal grandmother also appeared in the action asking that, if

554 F.3d 1340 (2009) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, et al., Plaintiffs, The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Inc., through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Eugene Taylor, Bertha Barrett Young, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ms. Evon BILLUPS, Superintendent of Elections for the Board of Elections and Voter Registration for Floyd County and the City of Rome, Georgia, Ms. Tracy Brown, Superintendent of Elections of

On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou

936 N.E.2d 690 (2010) K.D., by and Through His Parents, NICHELLE D. and Bradley D., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. VILLA GROVE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 302 BOARD OF EDUCATION; and Dr. Steven Poznic, in His Official Capacity as District No. 302 Superintendent, Defendants-Appellants. No. 4-09-0913. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. August 24, 2010.

2024 UT App 72 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS SUMMER TATIANA MCKELL AND MICHELLE TISCHNER, Appellants, v. ROBERT C. MCKELL, Appellee. Opinion No. 20220315-CA Filed May 9, 2024 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable M. James Brady

218 P.3d 358 (2009) Anthony LOBATO, as an individual and as parent and natural guardian of Taylor Lobato and Alexa Lobato; Denise Lobato, as an individual and as parent and natural guardian of Taylor Lobato and Alexa Lobato; Jaime Hurtado and Coralee Hurtado, as individuals and as parents and natural guardians of Maria Hurtado and Evan Hurtado; Janet L. Kuntz, as an individual and as parent and natural guardian of Daniel Kuntz and Stacey Kuntz; Pantaleon

281 Wis.2d 595 (2005) 2005 WI 74 698 N.W.2d 583 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John R. MALONEY, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. No. 2003AP2180. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument April 12, 2005. Decided June 10, 2005. For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by L

766 F.Supp.2d 1305 (2011) Ignacio Damian FIGUEROA, Plaintiff, v. MERSCORP, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 10-61296-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. January 31, 2011. *1307 Kenneth Eric Trent, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff. Andrew Benjamin Boese, Robert Mark Brochin, Morgan, Lewis &a;

PER CURIAM: Bryan Whitehead appeals his convictions and 471-month total sentence for two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and two counts of brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). After careful review of the entire record, and' with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm Whitehead’s convictions, but vacate Whitehead’s sentences and remand for re-s

287 B.R. 112 (2002) In re AMES DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 01-42217 (REG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. December 31, 2002. *113 Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, New York City, by Martin J. Bienenstock, Esq., Michele J. Meises, Esq., and Samuel S. Kohn, Esq., of counsel, for the Debtors and Debtors in P

Lanzinger, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent from the court’s decision to dismiss this appeal as having been improvidently accepted. Although a conflict was not certified in this case, it is clear from the parties’ briefs that two distinct perspectives exist on the issue of whether the failure of a trial court to address a plea of not guilty by reason o