Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Tran v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.”
United States v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.public domain
*663FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PHASE ONE TRIAL CARL BARBIER, District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule, of Civil Procedure 52(a), the Court enters these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law relative to the Phase One trial. If any finding is in truth a conclusion of law, or if any conclusion stated is in truth a finding of fact, it sh
*880 OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. The Amended Original Complaint (instrument # 12) in above referenced cause alleges (1) breach of a Master Services Contract (“MSC”), and of Work Releases pursuant to it, to provide barges, tug boats, and other equipment to separate crude oil from water in Plaintiff BP Exploration & Produc
BP America Production Co. v. Marshallpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 61 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 62 This case involves two related oil and gas mineral lease disputes that were jointly tried. One of the disputes is between p
BP America Production Co. v. Marshallpublic domain
288 S.W.3d 430 (2008) BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, Atlantic Richfield Company, and Vastar Resources, Inc., Appellants, v. Stanley G. MARSHALL Jr., Robert Ray Marshall, Catherine Irene Marshall f/k/a Catherine I.M. Hashmi, and Margaret Ann Marshall f/k/a Margaret A.M. Jeffus, by and through David Jeffus, as Independent Executor of the Estate of Margaret Marshall, Appellees. and Vaquillas Ranch Co., Ltd., Vaquillas Unproven Minerals, Ltd., an
Plaquemines Parish v. BP America Prodpublic domain
Case: 23-30294 Document: 192-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/29/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED May 29, 2024
OPINION FABE, Chief Justice. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves the assessed value of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System for property tax purposes. On appeal from the Alaska State Department of Revenue and the State Assessment Review Board, the superior court conducted a trial de novo to assess the value of the pipeline by calculating its replacement cost and then accounting for depreciation. T
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the P ACIFIC R EPORTER . Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@appellate.courts.state.ak.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA BP PIPELINES (ALASKA) INC., ) CONOCOPHILLIPS ) Supreme C
Veracruz v. BP, P.L.C.public domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: In April 2010, a blowout, explosion, and fire occurred aboard the mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon as it was *1022preparing to temporarily abandon a well 50 miles off the Louisiana coast. Millions of gallons of oil discharged into the Gulf of Mexico before the well was capped nearly three months later.
365 F.Supp.2d 1241 (2005) CIBRAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC. f/k/a Amoco Oil Company, Defendant. No. CIV03-60069. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. February 24, 2005. *1242 *1243 *1244 Moises Me
Spring Creek Exploration v. Hess Bakken Investmentpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 13, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker
BP Oil Supply Co. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 14 – 48 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ___________________________________ : BP OIL SUPPLY COMPANY, : : Plaintiff, : : Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge v. : Court No. 04-00321
ACCEPTED 01-15-00266-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/15/2015 11:43:07 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
In re BP P.L.C. Securities Litigationpublic domain
*772 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon rig operated by BP pic exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, causing loss of life and the largest oil spill in this nation’s history. In the months that followed, lawsuits raising a variety of claims, including securities fraud claims, were filed
In re BP P.L.C. Securities Litigationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. On April 20, 2010, the Macondo well blew out, costing the lives of eleven rig workers, and setting off a chain of events that eventually sank the Deepwater Horizon rig operated by Defendant BP pic. The blowout spilled over four million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. In the months that followed, lawsuits raising a variety of claims, i
Slaven v. BP America, Inc.public domain
786 F.Supp. 853 (1992) Donald SLAVEN; Salvatore Russo; Carl Gassaway; Yeriko Nitta, d/b/a the Seacliff Motel; Salvatore Manzella; Steven Panto and Donna Panto; Heinz Pet Products Company, A Division of Star-Kist Foods, Inc., a California Corporation; Gregory Kuglis; and Jack Morici, On Behalf of Themselves and All Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. BP AMERICA, INC.; BP Oil Shipping Co., U.S.A.; BP Oil Supply Company; American Trading Transportati
This matter is before us on Plaintiffs-Appellants' Petition for Panel Rehearing ("Petition") and Defendants-Appellees' responses thereto. Upon careful consideration of the Petition and the responses, we grant the Petition in part to the extent of the modifications in the attached revised opinion. Our February 21, 2018 opinion is withdrawn and replaced by the attached revised opinion.
BP W Coast Prod v. FERCpublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Federal Reporter or U.S.App.D.C. Reports. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 12, 2003 Decided July 20, 2004 No. 99-1020 BP WEST
HEIRS OF LYDIA * NO. 2023-CA-0212 BERGERON, WIFE OF/AND SIDNEY J. SIMONEAUX LAND * COURT OF APPEAL PARTNERSHIP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA B-P AMOCO, AMERADA HESS * * * * * * * CORPORATION, WM. T. BURTON INDUSTRIES, INC., BROCK EXPLORATION CORPORATION, MONGRUE OIL COMPANY, INC., NORTHWEST OIL COMPANY, LYNAL, INCORPORATED, Q
i i i i i i OPINION ON REHEARING No. 04-06-00478-CV BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, Atlantic Richfield Company, and Vastar Resources, Inc., Appellants v. Stanley G. MARSHALL Jr., Rober
• • • • • • OPINION ON REHEARING No. 04-06-00478-CV BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY