Cases

21-2547; 21-2576 In re TransCare Corporation United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Argued: December 16, 2022 Decided: August 28, 2023 Nos. 21-2547, 21-2576 IN RE: TRANSCARE CORPORATION, Debtor.

STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: *237Following the dismissal of his original complaint, see LaMonica v. Tilton (In re TransCare Corp.) , 592 B.R. 272, 287-92 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018), the Plain

STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: The Plaintiff, Salvatore LaMonica ("Trustee"), the trustee of the administratively consolidated estates of TransCare Corporation and numerous debtor-affiliates (collectively, "TransCare" or the "Estate"), commenced this adversary proceeding to recover damages from the defendants under several theories discussed below. The non-individual defendants have moved to dismiss all or a p

MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS SUBSEQUENTLY FILED ADVERSARY PROCEEDING AND APPOINTING INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: Shameeka Ien, the plaintiff in class action adversary proceeding no. 16-1033 (the *72“Ien Proceeding”) brought under the federal and New York Worker Adjustment and Retraining No

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants William Hird & Co., Inc., and Daniel Murray appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Battaglia, J.), dated July 27, 2011, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Transcare Corporation and Michael Young which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants and that bra

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants William Hird & Co., Inc., and Daniel Murray appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Battaglia, J.), dated July 27, 2011, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Transcare Corporation and Michael Young which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants and that bra

McDonald, j. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, a man on the way from Jerusalem to Jericho is robbed, beaten, and left for dead. Two passers-by of significant social and religious status see the injured man, but choose to cross to the other side of the road. A third traveler of less repute, a Samaritan, comes to the man’s aid, takes him to an inn, tends to him through the night, and then pays the innkeeper the next morning

When the driver of an automobile approaches another automobile from the rear, he or she is bound to maintain a reasonably safe rate of speed and control over his or her vehicle, and to exercise reasonable care to avoid colliding with the other vehicle (see Power v Hupart, 260 AD2d 458 [1999]; see also Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 [a]). Drivers have a duty to see what should be seen and to exercise reasonable care under the circumstanc

When the driver of an automobile approaches another automobile from the rear, he or she is bound to maintain a reasonably safe rate of speed and control over his or her vehicle, and to exercise reasonable care to avoid colliding with the other vehicle (see Power v Hupart, 260 AD2d 458 [1999]; see also Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 [a]). Drivers have a duty to see what should be seen and to exercise reasonable care under the circumstanc

WATTS, J. This appeal arises from the grant of a motion to transfer by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and of summary judgment by the Circuit Court for Talbot County in favor of *177appellees, TransCare Maryland, Inc. and TransCare, Inc.,1 against appellants, Karen Murray and Bryson Murray.2 Karen filed a

Fornabaio v Beacon Broadway Co., LLC (2020 NY Slip Op 06853) Fornabaio v Beacon Broadway Co., LLC 2020 NY Slip Op 06853 Decided on November 19, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law R

Fornabaio v Beacon Broadway Co., LLC (2020 NY Slip Op 06853) Fornabaio v Beacon Broadway Co., LLC 2020 NY Slip Op 06853 Decided on November 19, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law R

Case: 23-20557 Document: 134-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-20557 May 30, 2025

*512 Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered July 10, 2014, which, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant Big Apple Car, Inc. (Big Apple) to change venue from Bronx County to Kings County, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. Plaintiff, a resident o

*604In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated February 28, 2012, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and granted the separate motion of the plaintiff Jean F. Joseph for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ counterclaim, and (2) an interl

OPINION OF THE COURT Lucy Billings, J. I. Background Plaintiff moves for a default judgment against all defendants except Five Boro Psychological and Licensed Master Social Work *173Services, PLLC, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Stand-Up MRI of the Bronx, EC., and Transc

*730In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J), dated December 9, 2004, which granted the third-party defendant’s renewed motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification. Ordered

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered March 3, 2006, which, to the extent appealable by plaintiff, granted the motion of defendants Morningside House Nursing Home Company, Inc. and Aging In America, Inc. (collectively Morningside) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs decedent suffered from Alzheimer’s disease and was a patient at Morningside’

Lebron v New York City Hous. Auth. (2018 NY Slip Op 01116) Lebron v New York City Hous. Auth. 2018 NY Slip Op 01116 Decided on February 15, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Repor

*604In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated February 28, 2012, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and granted the separate motion of the plaintiff Jean F. Joseph for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ counterclaim, and (2) an interl