⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

14 opinions for “Travis LeBlanc v. United States Privacy and Civil Liberties”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5197 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00542-RBW Filed On: July 18, 2025 Travis LeBlanc and Edward Felten, Appellees v. United States Privacy
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5197 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00542-RBW Filed On: June 2, 2025 Travis Leblanc and Edward Felten, Appellees v. United States Privacy
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5197 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00542-RBW Filed On: July 1, 2025 Travis LeBlanc and Edward Felten, Appellees v. United States Pr
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) TRAVIS LEBLANC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-542 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES ) PRIVACY AND CIVIL
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 4956355 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013-12-19 · Published · cited 1× · 129 So. 3d 1272; 12 La.App. 5 Cir. 623; 2013 WL 6713832; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 2782
MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. laThis is an individual lawsuit by John Oleszkowicz for damages he allegedly sustained as a result of exposure to naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) while working at the Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc. (ITCO) pipeyard in Harvey, Louisiana. Both Mr. Oleszkowicz and defendant, Exxon Mobil Corp. (Exxon Mobil), appeal the jury verdict, as well as other trial court rulings. For the reaso
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014-05-30 · Published · cited 27× · 152 So. 3d 909; 2014 WL 2450990
HIGGINBOTHAM, J. |4Pefendants appeal a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs after an eight-day jury trial in which the jury found a general contractor liable to its statutory employee for an “intentional act.” The jury also found the engineering companies responsible for guy wiring and bridge design liable under a negligence theory. For the reasons assigned, we reverse the jury“verdict in part, amend in part, affirm in
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 129× · 830 F.3d 216; 2016 WL 3923868
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge, joined by E. GRADY JOLLY, JERRY E. SMITH, EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, and PRISCILLA R. OWEN, concurring in part and dissenting in part: We dissent.1 Requiring a voter to verify her identity with a photo ID at the polling place is a reasonable requirement widely supported by Texans of all races and members of the public belongi
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-12-06 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 16, 2024 Decided December 6, 2024 No. 24-1113 TIKTOK INC. AND BYTEDANCE LTD., PETITIONERS v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 24-1130, 24-1183 On Petitions for Revi
District Court, E.D. New York · 2010-02-17 · Published · cited 14× · 687 F. Supp. 2d 237; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13520
687 F.Supp.2d 237 (2010) HUMAN RESOURCE RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., d/b/a Homeworks, and Oxford House, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Defendant. Vincent Reynolds, Edsel Calderone, Mary Monroe, Barbara Johnson, Frank Farino, Jan Pflanzer, Alicia Turner, Mike Josell, Estelle Lyons, Harold Walker, Dina Travis, and Oya Bangura, Plaintiffs, v. Suffolk County, Suffolk County Department of Social Services, and Suffolk Count
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-25-00316-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/23/2025 8:51 AM NO. 04-25-
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED NO. 15-25-00134-CV 15-25-00134-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS In the 9/10/2025 12:20 PM