⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Trawick v. Johnson”

Trawick v. Allenpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008-03-18 · Published · cited 1× · 520 F.3d 1264; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 5680; 2008 WL 706581
520 F.3d 1264 (2008) Jack TRAWICK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard ALLEN, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 07-11611. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 18, 2008. *1265 Randall S. Susskind (Court-Appointed), Equal Justice Initiative of AL, Montgomery, AL, for Tra
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012-07-11 · Published · cited 37× · 686 F.3d 224; 2012 WL 2819463; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14153
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT TANYA RENE JOHNSON, f/k/a Tanya  Rene Zimmer, Debtor-Appellant, v. WILLIAM H. ZIMMER,  No. 11-2034 Creditor-Appellee, ROBERT R. BROWNING, Trustee-Intervenor.  Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Trawick v. Hantmanpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2001-07-03 · Published · cited 15× · 151 F. Supp. 2d 54; 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 261; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10072; 2001 WL 800026
151 F.Supp.2d 54 (2001) Arthur L. TRAWICK, Plaintiff, v. Alan HANTMAN, Architect of the Capitol, in his official capacity, Defendant. No. 99CV1005 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 3, 2001. *55 *56 Jeffrey Howard Leib, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Mark E.
Ewing v. Trawickpublic domain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953-04-14 · Published · cited 5× · 256 P.2d 182; 208 Okla. 311; 1953 OK 113; 2 Oil & Gas Rep. 697; 1953 Okla. LEXIS 790
The plaintiffs in error were defendants below, and defendant in error was plaintiff below. They will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. The plaintiff brought suit on September 6, 1951, to quiet title, alleging that he was the owner in fee simple of a tract of land in Custer county, Oklahoma, from which had been reserved to the defendant Ewing 1/8th royalty *Page 312 on oil, gas, coal or minerals. That the defend
Zimpel v. Trawickpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1988-01-28 · Published · cited 1× · 679 F. Supp. 1502; 100 Oil & Gas Rep. 235; 25 Fed. R. Serv. 310; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1010; 1988 WL 10737
679 F.Supp. 1502 (1988) John ZIMPEL, Administrator of the Estate of Hedwig Zimpel, Plaintiff, v. Larry E. TRAWICK and Charles W. Brown, Defendants. Civ. No. 87-2068. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. January 28, 1988. *1503 James E. West, Daily, West, Core, Coffman & Canfield, Fort Smith, Ark
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023-05-17 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 17, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-364 Lower Tribunal No. F92-19854 ________________ Antonio Johnson, Appellant,
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953-05-05 · Published · cited 17× · 275 P.2d 292; 1953 OK 142; 4 Oil & Gas Rep. 63; 1953 Okla. LEXIS 691
275 P.2d 292 (1953) L.M. TRAWICK and Melville F. Boddie, Plaintiffs in Error, v. E.L. CASTLEBERRY et al., Defendants in Error. No. 35676. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. May 5, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 20, 1954. *293 F.R. James, Stroud, Joseph A. Moran, Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error. Walter G. Wilson, Chand
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 844 F. Supp. 535; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22038; 1993 WL 596232
ORDER ALSOP, Senior District Judge. This matter came before the Court on October 30, 1992, on plaintiff Resolution Trust Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Resolution Trust Corporation (the “RTC”) also asks this Court for a decree of foreclosure to allow it to satisfy its judgment. I. BACKGROUND
Johnson v. Cerverapublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987-05-29 · Published · cited 7× · 508 So. 2d 257
508 So.2d 257 (1987) Jeff JOHNSON v. N.J. CERVERA. 85-560. Supreme Court of Alabama. May 29, 1987. George E. Trawick, Ariton, for appellant. N.J. Cervera, Troy, pro se. JONES, Justice. This is a contract action brought by N.J. Cervera, a lawyer, to enforce a contingent fee contract between Cervera and his client, Jeff Johnson. The trial court, a
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
Alaska Supreme Court · 2014-06-27 · Published · cited 33× · 328 P.3d 77; 2014 WL 2917479; 2014 Alas. LEXIS 125
OPINION FABE, Chief Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Nathawn Katurl Johnson was convicted of and sentenced for, among other crimes, two counts of sexual assault in the first degree relating to his rape of S.S. One count resulted from Johnson's penetration of S.S.'s mouth without her consent, and the other count resulted from Johnson's penetr
Trawick v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983-02-01 · Published · cited 63× · 431 So. 2d 574; 1983 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4161
Appellant was indicted by the January 1982 term of the Covington County Grand Jury for the unlawful possession of marihuana contrary to § 20-2-70 (a), Code of Alabama 1975. Trial was had with the jury finding him guilty as charged. He was sentenced to six years' imprisonment and assessed a $10,000 fine. From that conviction he now appeals. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the State's evidence. We have carefully reviewed the State's evid
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011-12-20 · Published · cited 0× · 720 S.E.2d 441; 217 N.C. App. 605; 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 2604
720 S.E.2d 441 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Alvin Stevenson JOHNSON, Defendant. No. COA11-677. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 20, 2011. *442 Attorney General Roy A. Cooper, III, by Assistant Attorney General Brandon L. Truman, for the State. Appellate Defender Staples Hughes, by Assistant Appellate Defen
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009-10-02 · Published · cited 20× · 120 So. 3d 1130; 2009 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 124; 2009 WL 3171220
*1146 After Remand from Alabama Supreme Court MAIN, Judge. Shonda Nicole Johnson was convicted of capital murder, in violation of § 13A-5-40(14), Ala.Code 1975, for intentionally murdering Randy McCullar, who had testified or was to testify in a criminal proceeding, specifically a bigamy case, against Johnson, where the murder stemmed f
Johnson v. Moorepublic domain
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 493 F. Supp. 2d 1236; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41652; 2007 WL 1557484
493 F.Supp.2d 1236 (2007) Derrick JOHNSON, Petitioner. v. Michael W. MOORE, Respondent. No. 8:02-cv-1003-T-23EAJ. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 30, 2007. Rochelle Anne Reback, Law Office of Rochelle A. Reback, Tampa, FL, for Petitioner. John M. Klawikofsky, Office of the Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Respondent. <
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991-02-07 · Published · cited 21× · 926 F.2d 247; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1619; 1991 WL 11997
OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. This appeal by plaintiff CNA Insurance Companies (“CNA”), which has sought to invoke the jurisdiction of the district court under the federal interpleader statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1335, requires us to decide whether, arraying the various personal injury claims arising out of a motor vehicle accident against the availa
Brill v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 54 Ala. App. 39; 304 So. 2d 591; 1974 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 448
This is an appeal from a decree rendered by the Circuit Court of DeKalb County wherein primary custody of two minor children was awarded to the appellees, who are the paternal grandparents, with certain specific responsibilities to the children being reposed in the DeKalb County Department of Pensions and Security. Additionally, the appellant, who is the children's natural mother, was awarded certain specific visitation rights which the trial court states in its decree to be "custody"
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2025-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
Rel: December 19, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2005-04-27 · Published · cited 1× · 370 F. Supp. 2d 892; 2005 WL 1230648
370 F.Supp.2d 892 (2005) Chad JOHNSON, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS: Jo Ann Freeman, et. al., Defendants. No. 4:04CV-01266ERW. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. April 27, 2005. *893 *894 Ann B. Lever, Dan K. Glazier, Legal Services of Easte
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2004-10-14 · Published · cited 2× · 351 F. Supp. 2d 929; 2004 WL 3088635
351 F.Supp.2d 929 (2004) Chad JOHNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS: Jo Ann Freeman, et al., Defendants. No. 4:04 CV 01266 ERW. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. October 14, 2004. *930 Ann Lever, Legal Services Of Eastern Missouri, St. Louis, MO, was our lead attorney. <
United States Court of Military Appeals · 1958-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 10 C.M.A. 80; 10 USCMA 80; 27 C.M.R. 154; 1958 CMA LEXIS 381; 1958 WL 3533
Opinion of the Court ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge: In accordance with the provisions of Article 67 (b) (2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867, the Acting The Judge Advocate General of the Army requested the Court to review this case on the following question of law: “Was the board of review correct in concluding that the action of the convening authority in ordering t