Cases

824 N.E.2d 349 (2005) Patricia GRIBBEN, Plaintiff below, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant below. No. 94S00-0403-CQ-130. Supreme Court of Indiana. March 22, 2005. Morris L. Klapper, G.R. Parish, Jr., Klapper, Isaac & Parish, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Thomas L. Davis, Julia Blackwell Gelinas, Lucy R. Dollens, Locke Reynolds LLP, Indianap

835 So.2d 1251 (2003) Ronna MARTINO and Raymond Martino, her husband, Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., an Arkansas corporation, Appellee. No. 4D01-2693. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. January 29, 2003. *1252 Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., and Steven W. Halvorson

106 S.W.3d 718 (2003) WAL-MART STORES, INC., Petitioner, v. Monroe JOHNSON and Brandy Johnson, Respondents. No. 01-0441. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued March 20, 2002. Decided May 22, 2003. *719 Kevin D. Jewell, Alan N. Magenheim, Magenheim, Bateman & Helfand, P.L.L.C., Houston, and Douglas W. Alexander, Scot

OPINION WALKER, Chief Justice. Monroe Johnson and his wife, Brandy Johnson, sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., for personal injuries sustained by Monroe Johnson while shopping at Wal-Mart. The issues raised in the appellant’s brief concern the spoliation instruction included in the jury charge.1 The finding of Wal-Mart’s negligence and the amount of damages assessed by the jury are n

1 S.W.3d 91 (1999) Bettie Jo HOLLAND, Petitioner, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Respondent. No. 97-1140. Supreme Court of Texas. July 1, 1999. *92 Darrin M. Walker, George Chandler, William Jeff Paradowski, Lufkin, for Petitioner. J. Preston Wrotenbery, Kevin D. Jewell, Houston, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. On Apr

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Mike D. Lee sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., seeking damages for two Wal-Mart shopping center construction deals gone awry. The case was removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and tried to a jury on theories of breach of fiduciary duty and fraud or duress

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008. In The

JUSTICE HUTCHINSON delivered the opinion of the court: Edward Trevino appeals from the trial court’s order requiring West Coast Life Insurance Company (West Coast) to turn over to his children’s guardian the proceeds of an insurance policy, of which he was the named beneficiary, on the life of his ex-wife, Pamela K. Trevino

NO. 07-05-0216-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C NOVEMBER 3, 2005 ______________________________ RONNIE TREVINO, APPELLANT

NUMBER 13-05-578-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRIST

NUMBER 13-20-00382-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG TLC CEC PARKDALE, LLC AND COMPLETE EMERGENCY CARE HOLDING, LLC D/B/A TLC COMPLETE CARE, Appellants, v. GUADALUPE RECIO TREVINO JR., Appellee.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1034 Filed March 11, 2015 PORSCHIA BUTTS, CRISTINA TREVINO, STACEY RAMSEY, MARSHELLE WILIAMS, and the Class of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. IOWA HEALTH SYSTEM and CENTRAL IOWA HOSPITAL CORP., Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk Count

</

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-002-CV BROCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL APPELLANT DISTRICT V.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-002-CV BROCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL APPELLANT DISTRICT V. TONY BRIONES D/B/A WEST TEXAS APPELLEES CONCRETE AND METAL BUILDINGS, SAMUEL TREVINO D/B/A SAM’S CONSTRUCTION --

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10-00004-CV H.E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY, L.P., Appellant v. ADVANCE STORES COMPANY, INCORPORATED D/B/A ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, Appellees From the County Court at Law No. 1 McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No

Opinion filed June 12, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-23-00284-CV __________ DANNY CAMPBELL, Appellant V. HENDERSHOT EQUIPMENT CO., INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 266th District Court Erath Co

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

SASSO, J. This case presents the issue of whether Florida law imposes a duty on nonparties to litigation to preserve evidence based solely on the foreseeability of litigation. We hold that it does not and therefore affirm the summary final judgment in favor of Appellee, Tracey Remark. Factual Background and Procedural History Appellant, Shamrock-Shamrock, Inc. ("Shamrock"), owns prop

SASSO, J. This case presents the issue of whether Florida law imposes a duty on nonparties to litigation to preserve evidence based solely on the foreseeability of litigation. We hold that it does not and therefore affirm the summary final judgment in favor of Appellee, Tracey Remark. Factual Background and Procedural History Appellant, Shamrock-Shamrock, Inc. ("Shamrock"), owns prop