Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Tri-State Clinical Laboratories, Inc. v. Clinical Pathology Facility, Inc.”
AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Laboratories Inc.public domain
Opinion & Order BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge. *387TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. CO CO o I. The Parties. CO CO o II. The Patents-In-Suit. 03 05 CO A. Patent Ownership. CO CO III. The Pleadings. CO CO A. Complaint Against Mylan/Esteve.
Commonwealth v. ELM Medical Laboratories, Inc.public domain
33 Mass. App. Ct. 71 (1992) 596 N.E.2d 376 COMMONWEALTH vs. ELM MEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC., & others.[1] No. 90-P-1378. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. April 16, 1992. July 24, 1992. Present: KASS, JACOBS, & GILLERMAN, JJ. W. Paul Needham for the defendants.
McDonald v. Zimmer Inc.public domain
Office of the Director New Mexico 09:35:46 2020.07.10 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2020-NMCA-020 Filing Date: December 30, 2019 No. A-1-CA-36565 MICHAEL BRIAN MCDONALD, PH.D, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ZIMMER INC., and ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC.,
In re Vaxart, Inc. Stockholder Litigationpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE VAXART, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2020-0767-PAF MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 4, 2022 Date Decided: June 3, 2022 Stephen E. Jenkins, F. Troupe Mickler, IV, ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Gregory V. Varallo, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP, Wilmington, Delaware;
Avendt v. Covidien Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER (1) EXCLUDING CERTAIN TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF ROBERT AVENDT’S TREATING PHYSICIAN; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 116); (3) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (109); (4) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DAVID ANCELL (ECF NO. 110); (5) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DAVID HAMMEL (ECF NO. 113) AND (6) DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT WIT
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. v. Brenda Fortenberrypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01369-SCT JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. AND ORTHO- McNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. BRENDA FORTENBERRY, AS THE CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PERSON OF LOUISE TAYLOR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/27/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: TIMOTHY W. PORTER PATRICK MALOUF JOHN TIMOTHY GIVENS
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. v. Brenda Fortenberrypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01369-SCT JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. AND ORTHO- McNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. BRENDA FORTENBERRY, AS THE CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PERSON OF LOUISE TAYLOR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/27/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: TIMOTHY W. PORTER PATRICK MALOUF JOHN TIMOTHY GIVENS
Christiansen v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.public domain
*1314 OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On February 27, 2012, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “Panel”) ordered the centralization-of five actions pending in five districts, involving alleged defects in Wright Medical Technology Inc.’s Conse
Anne Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc.public domain
OPINION Gary R. Wade, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Sharon G. Lee, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Jeffrey S. Bivins, and Holly Kirby, JJ., joined. A railroad employee who was diagnosed with lung cancer filed suit against the railroad under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, alleging tha
Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ . . MOTION . TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST. AMENDED COMPLAINT- MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On April 29, 2014, Terry T. Gerritsen filed this action against Katja Motion Pic*1110ture Corporation (“Katja”), New Line Productions, Inc. (“New Line”), and Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. (“WB”) (collectively, “defe
in Re Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.public domain
FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 NO. CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR TH
Schumann v. Dianon Systems, Inc.public domain
43 A.3d 111 (2012) 304 Conn. 585 G. Berry SCHUMANN v. DIANON SYSTEMS, INC. No. 18655. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued May 18, 2011. Decided May 1, 2012. *114 Gregory A. Castanias, pro hac vice, with whom were Leon F. DeJulius, Jr., pro hac vice, Daniel A. Schwartz, Hartford, and, on t
Smith v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co.public domain
278 F.Supp.2d 684 (2003) Rita Fayen SMITH, Plaintiff, v. WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES COMPANY, Defendant. No. 3:01 CV 355-V. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. April 17, 2003. *685 *686 *687 *68
Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Downs v. Perstorp Components, Inc.public domain
126 F.Supp.2d 1090 (1999) Andrew A. DOWNS and Maria Downs, Plaintiffs, v. PERSTORP COMPONENTS, INC. and ICI Americas, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:96-CV-597. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee at Knoxville. December 27, 1999. *1091 Carl R. Ogle, Jr., Law Offices of Carl R. Ogle, Jr., Jefferson City, TN, for Andrew A Downs, M
323 F.3d 1354 HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC., and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.PROMEGA CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-1372. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED March 31, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Jennifer Gordon, Pennie & Edmonds LLP, of New Y
364 F.Supp.2d 820 (2005) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY INDUSTRIES LTD., Plaintiffs, v. ZENITH GOLDLINE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Defendants. No. 1:01 CV 443 RLY-VSS. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. April 14, 2005. *821
Green v. North Arundel Hospital Association, Inc.public domain
785 A.2d 361 (2001) 366 Md. 597 Darwin GREEN, A Minor, et al., v. NORTH ARUNDEL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. No. 88, Sept. Term, 1999. Court of Appeals of Maryland. November 27, 2001. *363 Suzanne C. Shapiro (Saul E. Kerpelman & Associates, P.A., on brief), Baltimore, for petitioners. Larr
Coastal Tankships, U.S.A., Inc. v. Andersonpublic domain
87 S.W.3d 591 (2002) COASTAL TANKSHIPS, U.S.A., INC., Appellant, v. Florence ANDERSON, Administratrix of the Estate of Morris Anderson, Deceased, Appellee. No. 01-99-01345-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). May 31, 2002. Rehearing Overruled August 8, 2002. *594 Chester Joseph Makowski, Royston, R