Cases

717 F.Supp.2d 152 (2010) James GONYOU, Plaintiff, v. TRI-WIRE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-40011-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 25, 2010. *153 James Gonyou, pro se. Sarah P. Kelly, Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendant. MEMORAND

612 F.Supp.2d 84 (2009) Brian BENOIT, et al., Plaintiffs v. TRI-WIRE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-30237-KPN. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 24, 2009. *85 Jeffrey S. Morneau, Donohue, Hyland & Donohue, PC, Holyoke, MA, for Plaintiffs. Christa C. Von Der Luft, Nutter,

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Dane R. Holler, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 2209 C.D. 2013 : Submitted: May 2, 2014 Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board : (Tri Wire Engineering Solutions, Inc.), : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER, Judge HONORABLE P.

699 F.Supp.2d 480 (2010) Cindi POLITO, Plaintiff, v. TRI-WIRE ENGINEERING SOLUTION, INC., Raymond Paris, Mark Spiers, Greg Connolly and John Marsh, Defendants. No. 07-CV-189 (DRH) (ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 19, 2010. *484 Frank & Associates, P.C., by: Robert C. Jacovetti, Esq., Farmingdale, NY,

OPINION BY Judge P. KEVIN BROBSON. Dane R. Holler (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), denying Claimant’s petition for benefits. Claimant sought benefits for injuries he sustained in an automobile accident that occurred while he was driving to Tri Wire Engineering Solution, Inc.’s (Emplo

RIVER RENTAL TOOLS, INC. * NO. 2021-CA-0716 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL SMITH POWER SOLUTIONS, * LLC FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM 25

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) DLT Solutions, LLC ) ASBCA No. 63069 ) Under Contract No. W52P1J-18-A-0001 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Francis E. Purcell, Jr., Esq. Joseph R. Berger, Esq.

ORDER RE: POSTTRIAL MOTIONS DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK, United States Magistrate Judge This matter is before the Court on the parties’ posttrial motions. Defendant Campbell Company (“Campbell”) moves for judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff Polara Engineering, Inc." (“Polara") moves for > a permanent injunction, a judgment of willfulness and an award of • treble damages, a finding of exceptional circ

OPINION AND ORDER Block, Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The current action is a part of the global fallout from the Enron Corporation’s (“Enron Corp.”) collapse. Prior to that collapse, in 1999, Enron Federal Solutions Inc. (“EFSI” or “Enron”), a subsidiary of Enron Corp., entered into a privatization contract (the “Contract”) with the United States Army to own, operate and maintain the power,

596 F.Supp.2d 949 (2009) NEGOTIATED DATA SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant v. DELL, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third-Party Plaintiff v. National Semiconductor Corporation, Counterclaim Defendant/Third-Party Defendant. Case No. 2:06-CV-528-CE. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. January 16, 2009.

OPINION BY JUDGE McCULLOUGH James M. Kush (Claimant) petitions for review of the October 26, 2017 order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the order of the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ), which dismissed Claimant's claim petition. Facts and Procedural History Claimant was employed by Power Contracting Company (Employer) as a union electrical worker. (WCJ'

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James M. Kush, : Petitioner : : No. 1688 C.D. 2017 v. : : Submitted: February 16, 2018 Workers’ Compensation Appeal : Board (Power Contracting Company), : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER

OPINION EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice. Appellants, Control Solutions, Inc., United Phosphorous, Inc. (“UPI”), and Mark Boyd (collectively, “CSI”),1 appeal from *134the trial court’s judgment notwithstanding the verdict (“JNOV”) that they take nothing by their claims against appellees, Gharda Chemicals, Ltd. (“Gharda”) and Gh

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ERICA DAVIS, as Personal No. 22-35099 Representative of the Estate of Andrew Dale Davis, deceased, and D.C. No. minor children, JC, minor child, SD, 2:20-cv-00536- minor child; MICHAEL M. BLW MASCHMEYER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of R. Wayne Estopinal, deceased; JAMES OPINION JOHNSON, individually and as Independe

387 F.Supp.2d 755 (2004) AQUATEX INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. TECHNICHE SOLUTIONS, Defendant. No. 3:02-0914. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. September 27, 2004. *756 *757 *758 Jack A. Wheat, Stites & Harbison, Louisv

446 F.Supp.2d 551 (2006) KRAFT FOODS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. BANNER ENGINEERING & SALES, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 305CV248. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. August 25, 2006. *552 *553 *554

OPINION BY JUDGE COSGROVE Karan and Pushpa Singh (Claimants) petition for review of an August 10, 2016 order .of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), denying compensation as dependents under a fatal claim petition. Upon review, we reverse and remand. Claimants are the parents of Mandeep Rana (Decedent). At the

ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. In this lawsuit, plaintiff Donald Kapps, M.D., seeks to recover for injuries he suffered after the tip of a catheter made by defendant Biosense Webster, Inc. (“Biosense”) and reprocessed by defendant Ascent Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (“Ascent”)1 broke off in his heart during a medical procedure at the Mayo Clinic. Kapps filed a moti

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Sam A. Lindsay, United States District Judge- On February 9, 2017, the court issued a memorandum opinion and order finding that Plaintiffs had established a prima facie case that the court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants Dominic Mag-liarditi (“Mr. Magliarditi”); Francine Magliarditi, as sued in her capacity as trustee of FRM Trust, DJM Irrevocable Trust, and Fane Trust

*1372 RADER, Chief Judge. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted SynQor, Inc. (SynQor) partial summary judgment of infringement against nine power converter manufacturers (Defendants) on U.S. Patents Nos. 7,072,190 ('190 Patent); 7,272,021 ('021 Patent); 7,564,702 ('