Cases

MOREMEN, Chief Justice. The question to be decided in this case concerns whether Frank Triplett obtained title to a six-acre tract of land by adverse possession. The circuit court held that he did not. Joseph Triplett owned land in Boyd County. Katherine Triplett was his wife. They had eight children'. In the year of 1903, Joseph Triplett built a house on his land. Frank Triplett, one of t

652 S.E.2d 302 (2007) Peggy Johnson STURGILL, Administratrix of the Estate of Charlie L. Johnson, Plaintiff v. ASHE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., Defendant. No. COA06-1476. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 6, 2007. Vannoy, Colvard, Triplett & Vannoy, P.L.L.C., by Daniel S. Johnson, North Wilkesboro, for the plaintiff-appellant. Sharpless & Stav

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HORN, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the “Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions or to Compel ... ” (document # 29), “Plaintiffs Brief in Support ...” (document # 30), “Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Appear at Initial Pretrial Conference” (document # 31), and “Plaintiffs Brief in Support ...” (document # 32), all filed Janu

[Cite as Okey v. Alliance Planning Comm., 2019-Ohio-2390.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DEBORAH A. OKEY, et al. JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. Appellees Hon. John W. Wise, J.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District  STATE OF MISSOURI,  Appellant,  WD84640  v.  OPINION FILED:  December 13, 2022 SEMAJ HARRIS,

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2024 WY 15 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 February 1, 2024 BJAY NAGEL, Appellant (Petitioner), v. S-23-0147 STATE OF WYOMING, ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DIVISION, Appellee (Respondent). Appeal fro

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2024 WY 29 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 March 21, 2024 JUDY VALENCIA, Appellant (Petitioner), v. S-23-0174 STATE OF WYOMING, ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DIVISION, Appellee (Respond

The opinion of the court was delivered by Johnson, J.: Connie Bussman was driving a vehicle owned by her employer, Community National Bank (CNB), when she was injured in an accident that was caused by an underinsured motorist. Bussman settled with the underinsured tortfeasor for policy limits and tiren claimed underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under CNB’s commercial insurance package policy that included co

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 36 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2021 March 11, 2022 CANDICE REICHENBERG, Appellant (Petitioner), v. S-21-0119 STATE OF WYOMING, ex rel., DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERV

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge. Plaintiff Samuel A. Olatunji, a black male working for the District of Columbia Department of Transportation (“DDOT”), brought a two-count complaint against defendant District of Columbia alleging racial and sexual discrimination (Count I), and retaliation (Count II), in violation of Title V

Opinion issued August 9, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-10-01133-CR ——————————— MACEO JERATE DOWNEY AKA MACEO JERARD DOWNEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATHAN A. SAUNDERS, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 15-cv-2026 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 15, 16, 19, 20 :

ERVIN, Judge, dissenting. Although I fully agree with the Court that trial judges would be well-advised to avoid accepting separate verdicts concerning the various theories of first degree murder that are submitted for the jury’s consideration at separate times and that the trial court’s findings and conclusions concerning the admissibility of Mr. Dalrymple’s statement contain a number of errors, I cannot agree wi

642 F.Supp.2d 694 (2009) Dennis DUBUC and Carol Dubuc, Plaintiffs, v. GREEN OAK TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants. No. 08-13727. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 26, 2009. *696 Edward J. Christensen, South Lyon, MI, Eugene A. Goreta, Ecorse, MI, for Plaintiffs. Daniel A. Klemptner, Johnson, R

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MURGUIA, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on defendant Stockgrowers State Bank of Ash-land, Kansas’ (“Stockgrowers”) Motion to Dismiss plaintiff Blue Rhino Corporation’s (“Blue Rhino”) complaint (Doc. 2). In its Motion, Stockgrowers requests the court to dismiss Blue Rhino’s complaint or, in the alternative, to abstain from further review of the claims pen

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge GREGORY joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs Southern Blasting Services, Inc. and Piedmont Drilling & Blasting, Inc. *5

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: Jimmy Fernandez Garcia, Jr. (“Garcia”) seeks habeas relief on the grounds that the State of Texas violated the Double Jeopardy Clause when it tried him for the capital murder of Jimmy Lynn Garza (“Lynn Garza”) after a jury had already acquitted Garcia of the capital murder of David Moran (“Moran”). Garcia contends that collateral estoppel appl

176 F.3d 331 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ray Allen TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-6341. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Dec. 16, 1998.Decided May 10, 1999. John W. Tullis (argued and briefed), Bennett, Bowman, Triplett & Vittitow, Owensboro, Kentucky, for De

BERZON, Circuit Judge, concurring: I agree with the result reached in the court’s opinion. I write separately because I do not believe that we need to address whether next friend standing always requires a significant relationship. If we did need to address that question, I would be inclined to hold that a significant relationship is not always necessary. I. The Sup

FLANIGAN, Presiding Judge. The trial court, after a nonjury trial, found defendant Paul Bishop guilty of promoting obscenity in the second degree, § 573.030, RSMo 1986, as amended, a class A misdemeanor, and assessed a fine of $400. Defendant appeals. Defendant’s first point is that the trial court erred in receiving into evidence, over defendant’s objection, state’s Exhibit 4, a “VCR tape,” “because the