Cases

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00023-CV ___________________________ ANTHONY F. VACCARO, Appellant V. RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 67th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 067-330367-21 Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.

OPINION ANDERSON, Justice. In this declaratory judgment action, we are required to determine whether the 1990 amendment1 to the 1937 Utility District Act is unconstitutional. The amendment allows the legislative body of Carter County to change the manner of filling vacancies on the utility district’s board of commissioners from the present one of selection by the incumbent util

919 F.Supp. 1480 (1996) William C. HOUCHIN, Jr., Petitioner, v. Aristedes W. ZAVARAS, Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, Respondent. Civil A. No. 93-K-2651. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 28, 1996. *1481 Jean E. Dubofsky, Boulder, CO, for petitioner. Wendy J. Ritz, Assistant Attorney General, D

SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign

ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2486 In re: DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in his official capacity and in his individual capacity, Petitioner. ---------------------------------------------------

15‐0690 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2015 4 (Argued: June 8, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2017*) 5

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal in forma pauperis from a denial of a writ of habeas corpus by the District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. We reverse and remand for a meaningful hearing on the petitioner’s allegations. We are mindful of Judge Gewin’s admonition that “once fairly tried

86 Cal.App.3d 164 (1978) 150 Cal. Rptr. 183 In re ANTHONY J., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. JOSEPH J. BOTKA, as Chief Probation Officer, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY J., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 41711. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. November 8, 1978.

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

107 Cal.App.3d 962 (1980) 166 Cal. Rptr. 238 In re ANTHONY J., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. JOSEPH J. BOTKA, as Chief Probation Officer, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY J., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 46757. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. July 8, 1980.

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Combs v. Int’l Ins. Co. No. 01-6493 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0002P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0002p.06 Corsi, LANDMAN, CORSI, BALLAINE & FORD, New York, New York, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: John H. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Dwyer, J

CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which KEITH, J., joined. BATCHELDER, J., concurred in Part IV only. OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Brownell Combs, II, Administrator C.T.A. of the Estate of Leslie Combs, II, deceased, appeals an order granting Defendant, International Insurance Company, summary judgment aga

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND REINSTATING THE CAUSE OF ACTION McGOVERN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On November 24, 1982, the United States filed an information charging the Defendants Gregory D. Hicks and Stevens J. Shale with killing one cow and two bull elk within the boundaries of Olympic National Park in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 256b. The killings occurred in the lower

MEMORANDUM, ORDER, & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction..............................................................168 II. Facts........................ 170 A. Procedural History....................................................170 B. Evidence on Poker..................

Nelson, Justice. Albert Schmidt died testate February 7, 1937. His last will and testament bearing date May 22, 1929, was duly admitted to probate on March 29, 1937, by order of the probate court of Hennepin County. The testator placed a sum in trust under the second paragraph of his will as follows: “Second: I give and bequeath the sum of One Hundred and Thirty-five Thousand Dollars ($135,000

63 Cal.2d 319 (1965) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EARNEST LeROY JACOBSON, Defendant and Appellant. Crim. No. 8250. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. Sept. 17, 1965. Frank C. Morales, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Gor

256 Minn. 64 (1959) 97 N.W. (2d) 441 IN RE TRUSTEESHIP UNDER WILL OF ALBERT SCHMIDT. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS v. FRIDA KIRSCHMANN AND OTHERS. WILLIAM P. ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANT. No. 37,515. Supreme Court of Minnesota. June 19, 1959. *66 Dallas S. Townse

Marsh, Commissioner. At this early stage of the proceedings, a question of great importance is submitted to the commissioners of appraisement, the determination of which will probably admit or exclude a large mass of evidence herein. The owners of Goat Island and the smaller isles in proximity, claim that they, on this appraisement, are entitled to the-use of the water power afforded by the Niagara River a s it