Cases

524 F.Supp.2d 302 (2007) TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL & TOWER, Plaintiff, v. CARRIER CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 03 Civ. 759(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 23, 2007. *303 Mark T. Mullen, Esq., Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. John J. Ryan, Esq., Ahmuty, Demers & McManus, Alb

20-1228 (L) Doe v. The Trump Corporation UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 (Argued: December 01, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2021) Docket Nos. 20-1228-cv/20-1278-cv JANE DOE, LUKE LOE, RICHARD ROE, MARY MOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0065p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - CARRIER CORPORATION; CARRIER SA; Plaintif

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Carrier Corporation, Carrier SA, and Carrier Italia S.p.A. *435 (collectively “Carrier”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims under the Sherman Act and the Tennessee Trade Practices Act for lac

WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge. *797Table of Contents I. Background...798 A. Contraceptive Mandate...798 B. Regulatory Action to Accommodate Religious Objections...799 C. Hobby Lobby & Wheaton College ...800 D. Regulat

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TERESA RICHARDSON; CHRISTOPHER CARROLL; GINA ARFI; and AIDA ZYGAS, Plaintiffs, Civ. Action No. 20-2262 (EGS) v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; LOUIS DEJOY, in his official capacity as Postmaster General of the United States; and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, De

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The work of this court, and more broadly of the federal Judiciary, is to resolve disputes between parties; that is what the court endeavors to do today in ruling on the two motions before it. Plaintiffs in both cases are refugees, who find themselves in dire circumstances, their family members who yearn to be reunited with them, and hum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TIKTOK INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02658 (CJN) DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et. al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 15, 2019, acting pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5067 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00766-JEB Filed On: March 26, 2025 J.G.G., et al., Appellees v. Do

Williams, Senior Circuit Judge: Officers of the United States swear to "faithfully discharge the duties of the[ir] office." 5 U.S.C. § 3331 ; see also U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 8 (requiring the President to swear that he "will faithfully execute the Offic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-253 (RDM) DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action, brought by three organizations challenging an

RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge *12In this action, Plaintiffs Public Citizen, Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. ("NRDC"), and Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO ("CWA") challenge the lawfulness of Executive Order 13771, issued by President Trump on January 30, 2017, and two guidance documents issued by the Office of Management and Budget (

RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This action, brought by three organizations challenging an Executive Order and related guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget ("OMB"), is before the Court for a second time. In a prior decision, the Court concluded that Plaintiffs had not met their threshold burden of *64alleging or ot

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge These cases present an array of administrative and constitutional challenges to the Department of Homeland Security's ("DHS") rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA") program. Though the government disputes these challenges on the merits, its primary defenses concern the Court's authority to hear the cases: the government contends that most plaintiffs lack standin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-253 (RDM) DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this action, Plaintiffs Public Citizen, Inc., Natural Resources

CAVANAGH, J. The issue in this case is the proper interpretation of the “serious impairment of body function” threshold for non-economic tort liability under MCL 500.3135. We hold that Kreiner v Fischer, 471 Mich 109; 683 NW2d 611 (2004), was wrongly decided because it departed from the plain language of MCL 500.3135, and is therefore overruled. We further hold that, in thi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 20-cv-2340(EGS) JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs the States of New York, Hawaii, and New Jersey; the City of New York; and the City and County of S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 20-cv-2340(EGS) DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiffs, the States of New York, Hawaii, and New Jersey; the City of New York; and the City

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Liana Carrier Ltd. (“Liana Carrier”) and Amir Rimon (“Rimon”)(col-lectively, “Plaintiffs”) were minority shareholders of defendant Pure Biofuels Corp. (“Pure Corp”), Plaintiffs filed a complaint (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 2) on May 12, 2014 against Pure Corp., along with defendants Pure Biofuels del Peru S.A,C.(“Pure del Peru”

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AYE AYE THEIN, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25 - 2369 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., Defendants. ME