⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Trump v. British Broadcasting Corporation”

Trump v. Barbarapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2026-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2026-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2026-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2026-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-12-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE FOX CORPORATION DERIVATIVE CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION C.A. No. 2023-0418-JTL MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Date Submitted: November 22, 2024 Date Decided: December 27, 2024 Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, Christopher M. Foulds, FRIEDLANDER & GORRIS, P.A., Wilmington, Delawa
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 24, 2017 Decided January 31, 2018 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Rehearing En Banc Theodore B. Olson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
District Court, S.D. Texas · 1973-09-05 · Published · cited 18× · 366 F. Supp. 374
366 F.Supp. 374 (1973) TEXASGULF, INC., Plaintiff, v. CANADA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 73-H-1056. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division. September 5, 1973. *375 *376 *377 *378
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997-02-06 · Published · cited 214× · 106 F.3d 582
106 F.3d 582 36 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1196 In re Barbara H. ALLEN, Appellant.BETTER GOVERNMENT BUREAU, INCORPORATED, an Ohio Corporation,Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Darrell V. McGRAW, Jr., Attorney General, State of WestVirginia, Personally and in his Official Capacity; BetterGovernment Bureau Office of the Attorney General State ofWest Virginia, A Body Politic, A Corporate Instrumentalityof Government
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019-02-28 · Published · cited 31× · 365 F. Supp. 3d 1250
URSULA UNGARO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1255THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon intervenor The New York Times Company's ("The Times") Motion for Access to Judicial Records (D.E. 254).1 For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted as prescribed below. I.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASSOCIATED PRESS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-00532 (TNM) TAYLOR BUDOWICH, in his official capacity as White House Deputy Chief of Staff, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER About two months ago, President Donald Trump r
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-12-24 · Published · cited 6× · 124 F.4th 1128
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHINA UNICOM (AMERICAS) No. 22-70029 OPERATIONS LIMITED, Petitioner, OPINION v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission Argued and Submitted February 15, 2023
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-23 · Published · cited 175× · 599 U.S. 670
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Shields v. Murdochpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-09-18 · Published · cited 53× · 891 F. Supp. 2d 567; 2012 WL 4097199
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge: Gregory L. Shields, G.E. Stricklin, and Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund (“Iron Workers”) have filed shareholder derivative actions against a group of News Corporation directors and officers (collectively, the “News Corp. Defendants”) alleging, inter alia, violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 193
Page v. Oath Inc.public domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2022-01-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CARTER PAGE, § § No. 79, 2021 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. S20C-07-030 OATH INC., § § D
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-07-01 · Published · cited 119× · 603 U.S. 707
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-23 · Published · cited 207× · 599 U.S. 670
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 670–735 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 23, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2021-06-30 · Published · cited 56× · 492 P.3d 586; 2021 NMSC 026
Office of the Director New Mexico 13:39:18 2022.07.26 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-026 Filing Date: June 30, 2021 No. S-1-SC-38356 SEN. CLIFF PIRTLE, REP. ZACH COOK, REP. REBECCA DOW, SEN. CRAIG BRANDT, REP. WILLIE MA
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CROWLEY GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 21-cv-2298 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Crowley Government S
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-07-01 · Published · cited 74× · 603 U.S. 707
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 707–798 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT July 1, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are r