Cases

Cohen v Trump Org. LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 06421) Cohen v Trump Org. LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 06421 Decided on November 15, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<

Cohen v Trump Org. LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 06421) Cohen v Trump Org. LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 06421 Decided on November 15, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 180] Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Donald J. Trump’s (“Defendant”) motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s Motion..for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (“Def. Mot.”), ECF No. 180. The motio

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; APPOINTING CLASS REPRESENTATIVE; AND APPOINTING CLASS COUNSEL GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Art Cohen’s Motion for Class Certification, Appointment of Class Representative, and Appointment of Class Counsel. (Dkt. No. 39.) Plaintiffs proposed Class consists of: [A]ll persons who purchased

II. BACKGROUND A. The 116th Congress and the House Oversight Committee On January 3, 2019, the 116th Congress began with the Democratic Party controlling a majority of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. One of the House's first actions was to adopt the "Rules of the House of Representatives," which govern proceedings during the two-year term. This vote took pl

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, United States District Judge This Court was initially asked 1) to issue a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of by Arghavan Louhghalam and Mazdak Pour-abdollah Tootkaboni, lawful permanent residents who were detained at Boston Logan International Airport (“Logan”) for several hours upon arrival from an academic conference outside the United States and 2) to declare unlawful Executive Or

PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. Procedural Background In a previous Opinion, the Court held that the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland have standing to challenge, in his official capacity, President Donald J. Trump based on his alleged violations of the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.1 The Court found that

PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In a previous Opinion1 the Court held that Plaintiffs, the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland, have standing to challenge actions of President Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity,2 that they believe violate the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.3 <

PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *732This suit alleges that President Donald J. Trump has violated the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.1 Plaintiffs, the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland, submit that the President is violating these Clauses because the Tru

ORDER: (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AWARDS [10cv940, ECF Nos. 589, 590.] [13cv2519, ECF Nos. 294, 295.] Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge On February 1

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge These cases present an array of administrative and constitutional challenges to the Department of Homeland Security's ("DHS") rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA") program. Though the government disputes these challenges on the merits, its primary defenses concern the Court's authority to hear the cases: the government contends that most plaintiffs lack standin

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: The District of Columbia and the State of Maryland commenced this action against Donald J. Trump in his official capacity as President of the United States and in his individual capacity, alleging that he violated the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. This action is the same as that which we address in appeal No. 18-2486, also d

OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: Trump University, now defunct, was a for-profit entity that purported to teach Donald J. Trump’s “secrets of success” in the real estate industry. During the 2016 presidential election, Trump University and Trump were defendants in three lawsuits alleging fraud and violations of var

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge: *230 President Donald J. Trump appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Buchwald, J. ) concluding that he engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination by utilizing Twi

NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case requires us to consider whether a public official may, consistent with the First Amendment, "block" a person from his Twitter account in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public official is the President of the United States. The answer to both questions is no. Our analysis proceeds as

MEMORANDUM DECISION ' AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”), Restaurant Opportunities Centers United, Inc. (“ROC United”), Jill Phaneuf, and Eric Goode (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), bring this suit against Defendant Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

People v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 04756) People v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 04756 Decided on August 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department MOULTON, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

OPINION OF THE COURT Sullivan, J. P. The husband appeals from a supplemental judgment which, pursuant to a stipulation of settlement, resolved the wife’s action challenging the enforceability of the parties’ postnuptial agreement. In their stipulation, the parties, subject to a number of specific modifications not here relevant, explicitly ratified the postnuptial agreement, including a certain confidentiali

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge This litigation concerns the Department of Homeland Security's ("DHS") September 5, 2017 decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA") program. In April 2018, this Court held that decision unlawful and set it aside, concluding both that it was reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") and that the reasons given to support it were inadequate. S