Cases

Motion Denied, Order Filed May 19, 2015 Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated, and Order Filed June 2, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-15-00290-CV ____________ TU NGUYEN AND CHAU HO-HUYNH, Appellant V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee

FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/17/2015 10:30:50 AM

Order filed December 17, 2015 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-15-00290-CV ____________ TU NGUYEN AND CHAU HO-HUYNH, Appellants V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee On Appeal from the 212th District Court

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by Minh Tu from a district court decision rejecting his claims and granting summary judgment to the defendants. His complaint sought to recover just over $3.9 million in life insurance issued by three different insurers on the life of Minh Tu’s wife, Phuong Ly. Summary judgment was granted because the district court found insufficient admi

Opinion of the Court by MOON, C. J. This case arises from the alleged failure of defendants-appellants/cross-appellees Department of Human Services (DHS), State of Hawaii (the State), Lillian B. Koller, Joe Cordova, Dave Eveland, and Stephen Teeter 2 [hereinafter, collectively, the State defendants] to enforce Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 102-14 (Supp.2005) and 347-12.5 (1993)

oI-oI-SjOLS IST Ct. ft^eata Ho"sror*pp£aw 1^ KiOou) (we tMJ) J&& ^}vr ttr -K/t Fee -fW ^A Cgv^j Or jq^ » \/ » iL*' :tU^*33*E=!&S^^*SX2S3saBas.i•sEcrrEja^asis—^w^ -«*s:4„

l/DATb'- 4£-/ /_*§. fir"' \FtRSTCG, • ''v. HO; NOV l g 20,5 CJudU AT TI4i'6 TiMc L'AkA ilS kllMl JJF 4 Cj3@\l> dP TMl'vS Cda*U5 |||$|§KJ iJid tilU CAOSt KJUKiblnS 135MP33 Aud 132U d5 A <2xiUiidAl CHidvidluikl ftlk. Tit dWEju6<- dP Al^K-AVAOd- l^dbbiWj_| CduiuT L.TJ PadM Tl4iL KlJTld Judical k0i6T*

FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON. TEXAS Fourken^h C&xr\ oK Appfak SEP 042015 Mfif \Lj-\K-fintt&-rR . JCHRISTOPHER A. PR.NE f)U^\U U $hph>£ 5 Tin ~7»E'D257K2CT roUXlT THE 5TA7E d TEYfrb I MtootJ* rtU/l/TK TEYJte TO THE HMtMIZLE TUD6E OF JAjr

XnTWECtoH- o-f A PP£A I Vs. The- Slcri-e- aT T^xaS Judicial MpVic^ XpsTK^ Ala^Urg. o^ &t0; AfTXPMi^ Corr*.* Kioto FfWcZJb^P-HTfe. APMlarrV tio Vh«- /\bo\J (itu/tAG Ke.sPoK\£ TKu Uo»\oratk Gc*j>vHn:> J*A-W.r "baitA l\uGus-V 30, ^.≪A CourA" o*f /\PF*_aK IcAtar "DfltUd AUG*u£-V "^Oi Z.olfc, ftW

FILED IN 1ST COURT OF APPEALS q-l^-eoco^o/ HOUSTON, TEXAS OCT 0 6 2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE -GLERK-

Mo._ (to TU^ _,cwm-T op _/iitMi*;<xl A^PP^Ms FILED IN FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ^VU**/^ Lv( vo*) "Ttt vft do£ ASSORT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS SEP 112015 ^ SEP 112015 Abel.aAcosta,

Case: 20-1096 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 02/17/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DAVID M. GILES, Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2020-1096 ______________________

RECEIVED IN JLM TU£ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS COURT of CAlMltfAL, AflfcAL$ AUG 12 2015 AUSTlM , Te*a£-«- ' ;-i.-. ><>. Abe!Acosla,Oto^ rt , F,LED ,N XSAAC &El\fA\hO£Z- » RPPeLLAAJT COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS \). AUG 13 2015 TlA£ ^TArk of "TE^AS* A fPE LLk Abel Acosta

0*4C W. Ckrisiofh^r PftA,&, 3~J>-£S^ -^h S&nrdnc; you, /ny C^y Of- Me. /•^vTvt-a-Ae. lltfuesr T^v Ljttkcff/Ou)! /lu^ JcII'clAS, 1ht$ f6wf/9irus fc Co^r-i-O'f d/op-uts j)/^rt&-e.rl Of- ?P_ k^

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00334-CV ___________________________ COVENANT CLEARINGHOUSE, LLC, Appellant V. CHRISTA J. FOSTER, Appellee On Appeal from the 211th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 21-8317-211 Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Jus

922 P.2d 1041 (1996) 82 Hawai`i 428 Anh Hue To LAU, Personal Representative of the Estate of Tommy Ho Lau; Anh Hue To Lau, Individually and as Prochein Ami of Howard Ho-Wick Lau, a minor; Anh Tu and Chieu Vinh Luu, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALLIED WHOLESALE, INC., dba Allied International; and Costco Wholesale Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10; Doe Corporations 1-10; Doe "Non-Profit"

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut dismissing their allegations of securities fraud against Defendant-Appellee Deloitte & Touche (“Deloitte”), arising out of De-loitte’s unqualified audit opinion for Price-line.com, Inc.’s fiscal year 1999 financial statement. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and issue

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut dismissing their allegations of securities fraud against Defendant-Appellee Deloitte & Touche (“Deloitte”), arising out of De-loitte’s unqualified audit opinion for Price-line.com, Inc.’s fiscal year 1999 financial statement. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and issue

iWOTXoM FAR £M B>ftAlg-^co/vlC^]>^flT^^ Ho. C8-lfe- 000^9 -CV October 10, 2016 Om^ or APfeAlS t>g>tU^ cx,a& -z-e-to Ge^-U j^ Ijj.g, CjuUiA-e^oy, I/, ^covs S1&&A.0M on ; saWvv ^^ ^^ *3a*NP* Uct\N\ 3bK&M^^ ^received\ OCT 1 0 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAN SUN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1612 (CKK) UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 28, 2025)