Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Tuesday Morning Corporation”
Faush v. Tuesday Morning, Inc.public domain
*352 MEMORANDUM RESTREPO, District Judge. Plaintiff, Matthew Faush, initiated this action against defendant, Tuesday Morning, Inc. (“Tuesday Morning”), seeking redress for racial discrimination.1 Specifically, the Complaint alleges, “Plaintiff and other African American coworkers were terminated by Defendant bec
Matthew Faush v. Tuesday Morningpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Appellant Matthew Faush is an African-American employee of Labor Ready, a staffing firm that provides temporary employees to several clients, including Appel-lee Tuesday Morning, Inc. According to Faush, Labor Ready assigned him to work at one of Tuesday Morning’s stores, where he was subjected to racial slurs
Keller v. Tuesday Morning, Inc.public domain
179 Cal.App.4th 1389 (2009) EDYTHE KELLER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. TUESDAY MORNING, INC., Defendant and Respondent. MICHAEL BERNSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. TUESDAY MORNING, INC., Defendant. No. B210787. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. November 4, 2009. *1391 Mower, Carreon & De
Tuesday Morning, Inc., and Tuesday Morning Corp., D/B/A Delaware TMC Corp. v. Rosalinda Liberatorepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00661-CV TUESDAY MORNING, INC., and Tuesday Morning Corp. d/b/a Delaware TMC Corp., Appellants v. Rosalinda LIBERATORE, Appellee From the 37th Jud
Korea Engineering Consultants Corporationpublic domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS I Appeal of-- ) ) Korea Engineering Consultants Corporation ) ASBCA No. 61724 ) UnderContractNo. W91QVN-17-P-0099 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Byung Chan Park
Heather Lopez v. Whirlpool Corporationpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2357 ___________________________ Heather Lopez Plaintiff - Appellant v. Whirlpool Corporation Defendant - Appellee
Apache Corporation v. Cathryn C. Davispublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ NO. 19-0410 ════════════ APACHE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. CATHRYN C. DAVIS, RESPONDENT ══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Christine Pitcher v. Centene Corporationpublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District CHRISTINE PITCHER, WD82564 Respondent, OPINION FILED: v. M
Huey v. Anavex Life Sciences Corporationpublic domain
25-1752 Huey v. Anavex Life Sciences Corporation In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2025 No. 25-1752 QUINTESSA HUEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, JONATHAN BLUM, individually and on behalf
Tina Wallace v. FedEx Corporationpublic domain
OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Tina Wallace worked for Defendanb-Appel-lee/Cross-Appellant FedEx Corporation (“FedEx”) for twenty-one years in a variety of positions. By 2007, she was a senior paralegal. By the summer of 2007, Wallace also had a variety of health problems that required her to take leave from he
Apache Corporation v. Cathryn C. Davispublic domain
Affirmed in part and reversed in part and Opinion filed April 4, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00306-CV APACHE CORPORATION, Appellant V. CATHRYN C. DAVIS, Appellee On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Cou
Apache Corporation v. Cathryn C. Davispublic domain
Affirmed as Modified and Substitute Opinion filed April 23, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00306-CV APACHE CORPORATION, Appellant V. CATHRYN C. DAVIS, Appellee On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca
MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants Liown Electronics Co.; Shenzhen Liown Electronics Co.; and Liown Technologies/Beauty Electronics, LLC (collectively, “Liown”), and enjoined distributors Boston Warehouse Trading Corp.; Abbott of England (1981), Ltd.; BJ’s Wholesale Club., Inc.; Von Maur, Inc.; Zulily, Inc.; Smart Candle, LLC; Tuesday Morning Corp.; Ambient Lighting, Inc.; The L
Kouba v. Omni Hotels Corporationpublic domain
SUMMARY MEMORANDUM OPINION; NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KIM KOUBA Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 8-cv-2106 (RLW) OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In the insta
PAUL C. WILSON, Judge. John Coomer claims he was injured when he was hit in the eye with a hotdog thrown by Sluggerrr, the Kansas City Royals mascot. Coomer sued the Kansas City Royals Baseball Corporation, claiming the team is responsible for Sluggerrr’s negligence and the damages it caused. A jury found in favor of the Royals, and Coomer appeals. ■ Among the jury instructions wa
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00741-CV Wesley Perkins, Appellant v.
Liberty Mutual Insurance Corporation v. Gary Herndonpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, Petty and Huff Argued at Salem, Virginia LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION v. Record No. 0936-11-3 GARY HERNDON CAREY ADDISON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OPINION BY v. Record No. 0943-11-3 JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS
Michael Woods v. Daimlerchrysler Corporationpublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. After Michael Woods was terminated by DaimlerChrysler Corporation for unexcused absences from work, he filed this action alleging that his discharge violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). DaimlerChrysler moved for summary judgment, contending that Woods had not established a prima facie case under the Act and that his claim was untimely under a
William Brian Taylor v. The Del-Nat Tire Corporationpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 19, 2011 Session WILLIAM BRIAN TAYLOR v. THE DEL-NAT TIRE CORPORATION Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-000887-09 Jerry Stokes, Judge No. W2010-01426-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 13, 2011 Plaintiff sued his former employer, claiming that he was entitled to unpaid overtime pay an
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00059-CV Panté Technology Corporation, Appellant v.