Cases

In the United States Court of Federal Claims WESLEY TURNER, Plaintiff, v. No. 24-1837 (Filed May 6, 2025) THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Wesley Turner, Rio Rancho, NM, pro se. Tate N. Walker, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defend- ant.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-305 (Filed: April 19, 2023) ************************************** RYAN PIERRE TURNER, * * Plaintiff, * * The Equal Access to Justice Act; v.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-305 (Filed: June 15, 2022) ************************************** RYAN PIERRE TURNER, * * Plaintiff, * * Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); v. * Motion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Affirmed.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Victor A. Bolden, United States District Judge Glenford Turner and Colleen Jacks-Turner (the "Turners" or "Plaintiffs") filed this lawsuit against the United States of America ("Defendant"), seeking damages after a United States Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA") surgeon allegedly left a scalpel inside Mr. Turner during surgery. The United States operates the VA's hospital in West Haven, Connecticut, and employed Jaimin Shah, M.D

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Affirmed Morrison, III

Affirmed Morrison, III

Affirmed Morrison, III

Motion of petitioner Russell L. Overton for divided argument granted.

Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 ,

ORDER A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows: The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Affirmed Morrison, III

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals is granted limited to the following question: "Whether the petitioners' convictions must be set aside under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194,