⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Tyler Lawrence Dowd”

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2004-02-10 · Published · cited 0×
6-96-028-CV Long Trusts v. Dowd  In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ___________________________
Dowd v. Calabresepublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 1984-05-30 · Published · cited 19× · 589 F. Supp. 1206; 10 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2017; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16268
589 F.Supp. 1206 (1984) John M. DOWD, Plaintiff, v. Samuel Ray CALABRESE, Defendant. William M. KRAMER, Plaintiff, v. Samuel Ray CALABRESE, Defendant. William M. KRAMER, Plaintiff, v. James A. DRINKHALL, et al., Defendants. John M. DOWD, Plaintiff, v. James A. DRINKHALL, et al., Defendants. James A. DRINKHALL, Plaintiff, v. William M. KRAMER, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 80-0911, 80
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017-09-12 · Published · cited 0× · 527 S.W.3d 908; 2017 WL 3996213; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 913
OPINION James M. Dowd, Chief Judge Ati R. Wilson pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County to one count of the class D felony of animal abuse. The court sentenced Wilson to one year of confinement in the county jail. Subsequently, Wilson filed a Rule 29.07(d)1 motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The court denied it without an e
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981-02-02 · Published · cited 57× · 636 F.2d 86; 47 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 718; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20496
PER CURIAM: Defendant, Leo Quimby, appeals judgment entered on a jury conviction for two counts of willfully failing to supply information regarding gross income to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. He asserts on appeal (i) his arrest warrant was not supported by a showing of probable cause under
District Court, E.D. California · 2010-02-16 · Published · cited 6× · 693 F. Supp. 2d 1154; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20887; 2010 WL 596178
693 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2010) ANDREWS FARMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CALCOT, LTD., Eadie and Payne, and Robert W. Norris, Defendants. Case No. CV-F-07-0464 LJO DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. February 16, 2010. *1155 Ralph B. Wegis, Michael Jonathan Stump, The Law Offices of Ralph B. Wegis, P.C., Bakersfield, CA, f
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-01-07 · Published · cited 0× · 917 F. Supp. 2d 231; 55 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2920; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2806; 2013 WL 76188
*234OPINION THOMAS P. GRIESA, District Judge. This putative class action arises out of the massive Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Bernard Madoff. The lead Plaintiff in this case, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers (“Operating Engineers”), is a multi-employer pension plan governed by ERISA. Operating Engineers was an investor i
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013-10-16 · Published · cited 2× · 978 F. Supp. 2d 759; 2013 WL 5652646; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148741; 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 742
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for reinstatement and interim front pay (Doc. # 292), defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (Doc. #316), defendant’s motion for new trial and remittitur (Doc. #317), defendant’s motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3) (Doc. # 348), and pl
State v. Merolapublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985-02-13 · Published · cited 0× · 689 S.W.2d 705; 1985 Mo. App. LEXIS 4001
CLEMENS, Senior Judge. Under § 216.460 RSMo. a prison inmate who offers violence to a guard faces from 2 to 5 years further confinement. The state dually charged defendant-prisoner with that violation. A jury found defendant guilty and the court sentenced him as a prior felon to two concurrent four-year prison terms. He appeals. Here defendant makes two points. First he contends the court erred in letting
District Court, D. Colorado · 2005-09-12 · Published · cited 9× · 387 F. Supp. 2d 1130; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25969
387 F.Supp.2d 1130 (2005) In re QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This order applies to Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Qwest, et al, Case No. 04-cv-00238-REB-CBS No. CIV.01-CV01451REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01616REBCBS, CIV.A01CV02083REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01472REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01799REBCBS, CIV.A02CV00333REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01527REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01930REBCBS, CIV.A02CV00658REBCBS, CIV.A02CV00755REBCBS, CIV.A02CV
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-28 · Published · cited 9× · 175 F. Supp. 3d 44; 2016 WL 1241533; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39953
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: These consolidated putative class actions are the latest in a series of cases in recent years to allege a longstanding conspiracy by some of the world’s largest banks to manipulate a benchmark interest rate. -In the other cases, plaintiffs allege efforts to fix the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), see, e.g., In re LIBOR-Based Fin. Inst
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-02-02 · Published · cited 11× · 306 F. Supp. 3d 610
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge *615In this putative class action, familiarity with which is presumed, Plaintiffs-several *616institutional investors-allege that Defendants, some of the world's largest banks, illegally manipulated the U.S. Dollar ISDAfix ("ISDAfix"),
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2009-10-27 · Published · cited 7× · 694 F. Supp. 2d 1192; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99727; 2009 WL 3517630
694 F.Supp.2d 1192 (2009) In re WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. In re Washington Mutual, Inc. Securities Litigation This Document Relates to: All Cases. Case Nos. 2:08-md-1919 MJP, C08-387 MJP. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. October 27, 2009. *1202 James Abram Har
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2003-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
6-96-028-CV Long Trusts v. Dowd In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999-02-03 · Published · cited 4× · 35 F. Supp. 2d 582; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1131; 1999 WL 51852
35 F.Supp.2d 582 (1999) IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 17 INSURANCE FUND and its Trustees, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 1:97-CV-1422. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 3, 1999. *583 *584 Eben O. McNair, Timothy Joseph Galla
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002-09-20 · Published · cited 24× · 305 F.3d 177; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 19751; 2002 WL 31102682
FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Leah Woskob, the Debtor in bankruptcy, appeals from an order of the District Court determining that she did not timely exercise her option to purchase her late husband Victor’s interest in their real estate partnership, the Woskob Legends Partnership (the “Legends Partnership”). Under the partnership agreement, Leah had 30 days from the date of an act of dissolution or 90 days from the death of a partne
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022-05-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEAMSTER MEMBERS RETIREMENT ) PLAN, individually and on behalf of all ) others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0807-MTZ ) RANDALL S. DEARTH, ROBERT M. ) FORTWANGLER, STEVAN R. ) SCHOTT, JAMES A. COCCAG
In Re Woskobpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002-09-20 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-20-2002 In Re Woskob Precedential or Non-Precedential:
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2019-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE INTER-LOCAL PENSION FUND ) GCC/IBT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0910-MTZ ) CALGON CARBON ) CORPORATION, )
Tafflin v. Levittpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1990-03-19 · Published · cited 641× · 107 L. Ed. 2d 887; 110 S. Ct. 792; 493 U.S. 455; 1990 U.S. LEXIS 568
Justice White, concurring. I agree that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over civil RICO actions and join the opinion and judgment of the Court. I add a few words only because this Court has rarely considered contentions that civil actions based on federal criminal statutes must be heard by the federal courts. As the Court observes, ante, at 465, the uniform construction of federal criminal
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020-06-03 · Published · cited 4× · 961 F.3d 34
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1794 TOWN OF WEYMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS; ROBERT HEDLUND, Mayor of Town of Weymouth; PATRICK M. O'CONNOR, State Senator; MICHAEL SMART, Vice President District Six; KENNETH J. DIFAZIO, District Three Councilor; JANE HACKETT, Councilor at Large; ED HARRINGTON, District Five Councilor; REBECCA HAUGH, District One Councilor; ARTHUR MATHEWS, District Four Councilor; MICHAEL MOLISSE, Councilor