⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “URBAN IMAGE INC”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-04-03 · Published · cited 92× · 853 F.3d 980; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5675; 2017 WL 1208459
OPINION ORRICK, District Judge: INTRODUCTION Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Century 21 Department Stores, LLC (collectively “Urban”) appeal the judgment against them in a copyright infringement case involving fabric designs. The district court granted plaintiff Unicolors Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of copyright in
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017-01-27 · Published · cited 25× · 847 F.3d 415; 2017 WL 382330; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1506
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. This Lanham Act case turns on whether the shape and design of a small bag, modeled after a men’s Dopp Kit and used in personal care kits, are functional and therefore not protected as trade dress. Plaintiff sells personal care kits in such a bag. When another personal care kit seller copied plaintiff’s bag, plaintiff sued, claiming the bag was protected
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015-10-23 · Published · cited 22× · 806 F.3d 761; 116 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1699; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18459; 2015 WL 6405763
OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge. The “prior publication” exclusion of liability insurance contracts prevents a company from obtaining ongoing insurance coverage for a continuing course of tor-tious conduct. In this appeal, we consider the scope of the “prior publication” exclusion. I. On February 28, 2012, in the
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) URBAN AIR INITIATIVE, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-1333 (ABJ) ) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION )
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013-03-26 · Published · cited 18× · 935 F. Supp. 2d 1147; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50557; 2013 WL 1294670
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER C. LEROY HANSEN, Senior District Judge. On June 22, 2012, Defendants Urban Outfitters, Inc.; UO.com, L.L.C.; Urban Outfitters Wholesale, Inc.; Anthropologie, Inc.; Antrhopologie.com, L.L.C.; Free People of PA, L.L.C.; and Freepeople.com, L.L.C. (collectively “Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support (Doc. 33). Plainti
Texas Business Court · 2026-01-26 · Published · cited 1× · 2026 Tex. Bus. 3
2026 Tex. Bus. 3 The Business Court of Texas, First Division ESTEBAN QUINTERO and ATS§ CONCRETE SERVICES, LLC, § Plaintiffs, § § v. § Cause No. 25-BC01A-0022 § URBAN INFRACONSTRUCTION § LLC and ANUP TAMRAKAR, § Defendants. § ═══════════════════════════════════════ Memorandum Opinion and Order on
District Court, S.D. New York · 2006-05-08 · Published · cited 48× · 431 F. Supp. 2d 351; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27429; 2006 WL 1234966
431 F.Supp.2d 351 (2006) Kent BAKER, Plaintiff, v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. and Urban Outfitters Wholesale, Inc., Defendants. No. 01 Civ. 5440(LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 8, 2006. *352 *353 *354 *355
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-06-08 · Published · cited 2× · 792 F. Supp. 2d 675; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63831; 2011 WL 2396961
792 F.Supp.2d 675 (2011) CANAL + IMAGE UK LTD., Plaintiff, v. Steven LUTVAK and Robert L. Freedman, Defendants. No. 10 Civ. 1536(RJH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 8, 2011. *678 George Phillip Birnbaum, Minogue Birnbaum LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Barry Isaac Slotnick, Loeb & Loeb LLP, New Yo
District Court, District of Columbia · 2008-02-04 · Published · cited 19× · 533 F. Supp. 2d 64; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7618; 2008 WL 287998
533 F.Supp.2d 64 (2008) Mary JUERGENS, Plaintiff, v. URBAN TITLE SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-1524 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 4, 2008. *65 J.P. Szymkowicz, Szymkowicz & Associates, P.C., Washington, DC, for. Plaintiff. Michael Marlin Hicks, Bonner Kier
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007-04-18 · Published · cited 4× · 511 F. Supp. 2d 482; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29377; 2007 WL 1199662
511 F.Supp.2d 482 (2007) URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC., et al. v. BCBG MAX AZRIA GROUP, INC., et al. Civil Action No. 06-4003. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 18, 2007. *483 *484 Alfred W. Putnam, Jr., Mary E. Kohart, Michael J. Rinaldi, Noah A. Levin, William J. Lehane, Willia
District Court, S.D. New York · 2003-03-31 · Published · cited 40× · 254 F. Supp. 2d 346; 60 Fed. R. Serv. 1606; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4801; 2003 WL 1733778
254 F.Supp.2d 346 (2003) Kent BAKER, Plaintiff, v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. and Urban Outfitters Wholesale, Inc., Defendants. No. 01 CIV. 5440(LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2003. *348 Stephen A. Weingrad, Weingrad & Weingrad, New York City, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-11-28 · Published · cited 2× · 291 F. Supp. 3d 1060
IT IS SO ORDERED .
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-02-12 · Published · cited 4× · 816 F.3d 721; 117 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1817; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS
Superior Court of Delaware · 2017-02-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE URBAN GREEN TECHNOLOGIES, ) LLC, a Delaware limited liability ) company, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N13C-12-115 CLS ) SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES 2050 ) LLC, a Delaware limited liability ) company, and RAYOMAN
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-02-01 · Published · cited 67× · 681 F. Supp. 2d 41; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7971; 2010 WL 339091
681 F.Supp.2d 41 (2010) THE URBAN INSTITUTE, Plaintiff, v. FINCON SERVICES, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-00572 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 1, 2010. *42 Bruce Alexander McDonald, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Michael H. Selter
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE URBAN INSTITUTE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 09-00572 (HHK) FINCON SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Urban Institute (“Institute”) brings this action against FINCON Services, Shahid Yusaf, and Global
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006-12-27 · Published · cited 57× · 913 A.2d 178; 590 Pa. 431; 2006 Pa. LEXIS 2513
Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. I believe that the Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority’s taking of the subject property, in order to alter the type of entertainment provided there, burdened protected expression, thus triggering strict scrutiny under Article I, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Thus, 1 would remand the matter to the trial court for a determination of whether the government’s actions co
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007-09-12 · Published · cited 136× · 500 F.3d 1222; 84 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1214; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21907; 2007 WL 2659763
500 F.3d 1222 (2007) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. URBAN GORILLA, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-4128. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. September 12, 2007. *1223 *1224 Thomas R. Lee (Gregory D. Phill
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000-01-24 · Published · cited 0× · 10 P.3d 233; 2000 OK CIV APP 55; 71 O.B.A.J. 1624; 2000 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 28; 2000 WL 715940
OPINION HANSEN, Vice-Chief Judge: T 1 Garnishee/Appellant, Odyssey Re (London) Limited ("Odyssey"), seeks review of the trial court's order holding Odyssey's amended garnishment answer ineffectual, de*235nying its application to interplead, and granting judgment to Plaintiff/Appellee, Tulsa Community College1 ("TCC"), f
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004-08-26 · Published · cited 78× · 142 S.W.3d 128; 2004 Ky. LEXIS 182; 2004 WL 1906882
Opinion of the Court by Justice JOHNSTONE. On April 28, 1998, Dora Jurdana, Mari-jana Meculj, and Vesna Vasicek were crossing, on foot, U.S. Route 27 at the intersection of Nieholasville Road and Moore Drive when they were struck by a vehicle driven by Cara Rodgers. U.S. Route 27 is part of the state highway system and is located in the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (“LFUCG”). Jurdana, Meculj, and