Cases

909 F.2d 885 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2006, 116 Lab.Cas. P 10,271 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION, BUTTERNUT BREAD DIVISION,Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS LOCAL UNIONNO. 135, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-3287. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Nov. 19, 1989.Decided July 26,

168 F.Supp.2d 826 (2001) OVERNITE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al. Combs, Inc., Defendants. No. 2:00CV3109, 1:00CV1023. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. February 27, 2001. *827

913 F.2d 736 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2471, 116 Lab.Cas. P 10,285 VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC., a subsidiary of UnivarCorporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS,WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION 70;International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 287, Defendants-Appellees.

MANION, Circuit Judge. William Charles Construction Company, LLC (“William Charles”) entered into a labor agreement with the Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT”) for a construction project to expand a section of a two-lane highway into four lanes. At the start of construction, a jurisdictional dispute 1 arose

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROSEN, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed March 15, 1991. On March 28, 1991, Petitioner also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. On May 22, 1991, Respondent filed a brief in opposition t

745 F.Supp. 908 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants. In re APPLICATION XII BY THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR. No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 27, 1990. *909

GRANT, Senior District Judge. The appellant, Joseph D. Thomas, was discharged by his employer, the United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), and filed a grievance with his union, Local 710 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (“Local 710” or “the Union”). *912The appellant appeared before a Joint Grievance Committee

HOWARD, Chief Judge. On December 2, 2004, five structural steel contractors filed a complaint against a local union alleging antitrust law violations under the Sherman Act, labor law *49 violations under the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), and other violations under state law. Over the interve

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. Plaintiff General Drivers, Helpers and Truck Terminal Employees Local 120, brought an action alleging that Defendant Wilson Trailer violated the collective bargaining agreement between the parties when Wilson Trailer discharged Jeremy Cuka, a regular employee and Union member. Defendant Wilson Trailer Company

659 F.2d 841 107 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2221, 91 Lab.Cas. P 12,701 TOBEY FINE PAPERS OF KANSAS CITY, Division of Distribix,Inc., Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,andTeamsters Local No. 955, affiliated with the InternationalBrotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemenand Helpers of America, Intervenor-Respondent.GRAHAM PAPER COMPANY, Division of Jim Walter Paper, Inc.

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. Teamsters Local Union 579 (the Union) and B & M Transit (B & M or the Company) disputed whether certain B & M employees were required under the collective bargaining agreement to become members of the Union. This case is a product of that discord. An arbitration panel ruled in favor of the Union and the Union sought confirmation from the

980 F.Supp. 752 (1997) EXXON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL UNION 877, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 97-2198(AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. October 3, 1997. *753 Patrick J. Conlon, Joseph T. Walsh, III, Florham Park, NJ, for Pl

246 F.Supp.2d 602 (2002) THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY Plaintiff, v. LOCAL NO. 564, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS Defendant. No. G-02-462. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. December 13, 2002. *604 Jack C Brock, Mills Shirley et al, Galveston, for Dow Chemical Company, plaintiff. Jim Hart

WOOD, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Act and its amendments establish a national system of industrial-labor relations. The question before us in this case is whether a municipality-specifically, the Village of Lincolnshire, Illinois-can add to or *998 change that system throug

274 F.2d 19 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS & HELPERS LOCAL NO. 364, INTERNATIONALBROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMENAND HELPERS OF AMERICA and NormanMurrin, Ernie Maahs and MikeLawrence, Respondents. No. 12654. United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit. Jan. 5, 1960.

OPINION JONES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Allied Systems, Ltd. (“Allied”) appeals the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction preventing defendants-appellees Teamsters National Au*984tomobile Transporters Industry Negotiating Committee, Local 327 (the “union”)1 from engaging in a strike at Allied’

ENOCH, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.) seeks enforcement of its Order against the respondent Union, its agents and representatives, including the above named individual respondents, to cease and desist from engaging in, or encouraging the employees of any employer (othe

427 F.2d 582 GENERAL TEAMSTERS AND ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 992, Affiliated With The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation, Intervenor.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.PENNSYLVANIA GLASS SAND CORPORATION, Respondent,Teamsters Local Union No. 992, Intervenor.

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: This class action involves allegations of racial discrimination against one of the nation’s largest trucking firms, Speetor Freight Systems, Inc., against one of the nation’s most powerful unions, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, and against Te

LEVET, District Judge. This is an application for a temporary injunction to enjoin and restrain the respondent, its officers, agents, representatives, servants, employees, attorneys, etc. from certain acts hereinafter mentioned. The petitioner, Regional Director of the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter called the “Board”), alleges that the respondent is a labor organization wi