Cases

Case: 24-1396 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 10/03/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ US INVENTOR, INC., NATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS UNITED, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, JOHN A. SQUIRES, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA US INVENTOR, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-2894 (TSC) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff U.S. Inventor, Inc. sued the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA US INVENTOR, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-2893 (TSC) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff US Inventor, Inc.—a nonprofit organization that seeks to educate inventors, l

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA US INVENTOR, INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 22-2218 (JDB) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs US Inventor, Inc. and National Small Business United (“NSBU”) bring this action against defendants th

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, United States District Judge: 1. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are Defendant Gameloft, Inc.’s (“Gameloft”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (C.A. 14-1067, D.I. 13) and Defendants King.com Ltd. (“King.com”), Glu Mobile Inc. (“Glu Mobile”), ngmoco, LLC (“ngmo-co”), Rovio Animation Company (“Rovio”), a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) U.S. INVENTOR, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-3639 (ABJ) ) UNITED STATES PATENT ) AND TRADEMARK O

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ THE ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF MEDICAL GENETICS, THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, THE COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS, HAIG KAZAZIAN, MD, ARUPA GANGULY, PHD, WENDY CHUNG, MD, PHD, HARRY OSTRER, MD, DAVID LEDBETTER, PHD, STEPHEN WARREN, PHD, ELLEN MA

Case: 25-1371 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 08/14/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC, Appellant v. TVISION INSIGHTS, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2025-1371 ______________________ Appeal from the United Stat

782 F.Supp.2d 317 (2011) SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS (US) INC., and Shell Oil Company, Plaintiffs, v. RMS ENGINEERING, INC., Tesoro Corporation, and Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:09-cv-3778. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 21, 2011. Order Denying Reconsideration August 15, 2011.

735 F.Supp.2d 535 (2010) US FOAM, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ON SITE GAS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. On Site Gas Systems, Inc., Plaintiff, v. USF Technologies, Inc., et al., Defendants. USF Equipment and Services, Ltd., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Allied International Emergency, LLC., et al., Defendants. US Foam, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cummins Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants. Civil A

BRYSON, Circuit Judge. Kimberly-Clark Corporation owns three U.S. patents directed to diapers with elasticized side pockets, U.S. Patent Nos. 4,704,116 (Enloe I), 5,415,644 (Enloe II), and 5,599,338 (Enloe III). Kimberly-Clark brought suit against Tyco International (US), Inc., the Kendall Company, Inbrand Corporation, and Confab, Inc., (collectively, Tyco) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisc

Case: 22-1451 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 07/10/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AXONICS, INC., Appellant v. MEDTRONIC, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1451, 2022-1452 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Pate

Case: 22-1451 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 07/10/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AXONICS, INC., Appellant v. MEDTRONIC, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1451, 2022-1452 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Pate

Case: 22-1751 Document: 95 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WEBER, INC., Appellant v. PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1751, 2022-1813 ______________________ Appeals from the United Stat

Case: 22-1751 Document: 95 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WEBER, INC., Appellant v. PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1751, 2022-1813 ______________________ Appeals from the United Stat

Case: 19-1871 Document: 146 Page: 1 Filed: 03/05/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PFIZER INC., Appellant v. SANOFI PASTEUR INC., SK CHEMICALS CO., LTD., Appellees KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATEN

Case: 22-1391 Document: 70 Page: 1 Filed: 02/26/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FRESHUB, INC., FRESHUB, LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. AMAZON.COM, INC., PRIME NOW, LLC, WHOLE FOODS MARKET SERVICES, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, Defendants-Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2022-1

Case: 22-1391 Document: 70 Page: 1 Filed: 02/26/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FRESHUB, INC., FRESHUB, LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. AMAZON.COM, INC., PRIME NOW, LLC, WHOLE FOODS MARKET SERVICES, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, Defendants-Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2022-1

Case: 23-1227 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 08/16/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PLATINUM OPTICS TECHNOLOGY INC., Appellant v. VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023-1227 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent a

632 F.Supp.2d 1147 (2008) SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORP., Plaintiff, v. The TAG COMPANY US, LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No.: 06-81105-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. December 19, 2008. *1154 Stephen Bernard Gillman, Shutts & Bowen, Miami, FL, Mark L. Levine, Mark S. Ouweleen, Sean Gallagher, Shayna S. Cook,