Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1843 GABRIEL GARAVANIAN; TIMOTHY NIEBOR, Plaintiffs, Appellants, JOSE M. BRITO; JAN-MARIE BROWN; ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA; BRENDA K. DAVIS; PAMELA FAUST; CAROLYN FJORD; DON FREELAND; DONNA FRY; YVONNE JOCELYN GARDNER; VALARIE ANN JOLLY; MICHAEL C. MALANEY; LEN MARAZZO; LISA MCCARTHY; DEBORAH M. PULFER; BILL RUBINSOHN; SONDRA K. RUSSELL; CLYDE

Robert N. Scola, Jr., United States District Judge Milita Barbara Dolan, individually and on behalf of a putative class, complains about trip insurance that JetBlue Airways Corporation sells on its website to consumers in the process of booking air travel. Dolan's grievance stems from JetBlue's undisclosed receipt of a portion of the fee that is charged for the insurance. Dolan sets forth four counts: a violation of the Florida Dece

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Lauren Miceli sued her quondam employer, JetBlue Airways Corp. (JetBlue), for handicap discrimination and retaliation under Massachusetts state law. 1 The appellant alleges that JetBlue fired her due to her disability and not (as JetBlue maintains) because she flouted company policy on

FILED IN BUSINESS COURT OF TEXAS BEVERLY CRUMLEY, CLERK ENTERED 2/19/2026

681 F.Supp.2d 383 (2010) Katharine BISCONE, Plaintiff, v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 09-CV-3533 (ILG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 4, 2010. *384 Paul S. Hudson, Sarasota, FL, for Plaintiff. Christine Tramontano, Christopher G. Kelly, Judith R. Nemsick, Holland & Knight LLP, Ne

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) moves to dismiss plaintiff Elizabeth Chanicka’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint against it under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). This action arises out of Plaintiffs termination f

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Elsa Frederick (“Frederick”) appeals from the judgment *832of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Irizarry, C.J.) entered on April 1, 2016, principally dismissing her federal claims against Jet-Blue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) as untimely. Frederick alleged that she was a victim of race and age discriminat

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. Plaintiff Diane Gorzynski has filed a motion requesting that the Court determine that the January 21, 2014, text order of the Honorable Richard J. Arcara, United States District Judge, reassigning this matter to the Court’s Rochester Division is void ab initio. (Dkt. 113). Alternatively, Plaintiff requests that the Court transfer this matte

14‐2754‐cv Baez v. JetBlue Airways Corp. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: June 15, 2015 Decided: July 16, 2015) Docket No. 14‐2754‐cv ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ x ROSALINDA BAEZ, Plaintiff‐Appe

DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Rosalinda Baez brought claims against defendants JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) and its former employee, Tiffany Malabet (“Mala-bet”), arising out of an encounter at John F. Kennedy Airport (“JFK Airport”), in which Baez was reported by Malabet for making an alleged bomb threat and was then arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”). Baez arrived at the gate after

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. The trial of this employment discrimination action is scheduled to commence on April 21, 2014. (Dkt. 110). Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting permission to use the deposition transcript of Lee Gojmerae at trial. (Dkt. 86). Defendant opposes Plaintiffs motion. (Dkt. 94-1). Counsel appeared before the Court on March 31, 2014, and argued their resp

OPINION OF THE COURT Austin, J. On this appeal, we address whether intentional tort and fraud claims to recover damages allegedly resulting from the confinement of commercial airline passengers in an airplane remaining on a tarmac outside of a terminal for several hours without affording passengers food, water, clean air, and toilet facilities is preempted by federal law. We also determine whether, in an e

*278 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge. Plaintiff Emilie Morse (“Morse” or “plaintiff’) is a former Inflight Supervisor who worked for defendant JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue” or “defendant”) until her termination on July 8, 2006. Plaintiff filed the instant action on November 19, 2009, alleging that defendant wrongfull

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Daniel Duviella appeals from an award of summary judgment in favor of defendant JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) on his claim that JetBlue failed to promote him and later discharged him because of his age and race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and various state and lo

745 F.Supp.2d 214 (2010) Rosalinda BAEZ, Plaintiff, v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS and Tiffany Malabet, Defendants. No. 09-CV-596 (NGG)(SMG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 15, 2010. *218 Jon L. Norinsberg, Law Office of Jon L. Norinsberg, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Christopher G. Kelly, Robert J. Burns, Hollan

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Daniel Duviella appeals from an award of summary judgment in favor of defendant JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) on his claim that JetBlue failed to promote him and later discharged him because of his age and race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and various state and lo

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS SAYLOR, District Judge. This is an action against JetBlue Airways for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff George Gill, an incomplete quadriplegic, while boarding an aircraft. The complaint alleges negligence in the accommodation of Mr. Gill’s disability during aircraft boarding. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citiz

OPINION OF THE COURT Austin, J. On this appeal, we address whether intentional tort and fraud claims to recover damages allegedly resulting from the confinement of commercial airline passengers in an airplane remaining on a tarmac outside of a terminal for several hours without affording passengers food, water, clean air, and toilet facilities is preempted by federal law. We also determine whether, in an e

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), *477 entered February 18, 2015, which denied petitioners’ motion to vacate an arbitration award, and granted respondent’s cross motion to confirm the award, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Petitioners failed to meet their heavy burden of showing tha

*568Respondents are counsel to 728 unnamed current JetBlue pilots and 18 named former JetBlue pilots. All of the pilots are either captains or first officers. Each of the pilots entered into his or her own employment agreement with JetBlue. Each agreement is standardized and there is no dispute that the relevant provisions at issue are identical in each pilot’s respective agreement. As is relevant