⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “USA v. Ramiro Lozano”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 25, 2024 Decided August 12, 2025 No. 23-7139 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. TERRI R. WINNON, AND STATE OF TEXAS, EX REL. TERRI R. WINNON, AND TERRI R. WINNON, APPELLANT v. RAMIRO G. LOZANO, JR., ET AL.,
Winnon v. Lozanopublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES & STATE OF TEXAS ) ex rel. TERRI R. WINNON ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ~
Winnon v. Lozanopublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES & STATE OF TEXAS ex rel. TERRI R. WINNON, Plaintiffs, RAMIRO LOZANO, et al., ) ) ) ) ) V. ) Civil Case No. 17-2433 (RJL) ) ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUNT OPINION (September |S. 2023) [Dkt. #69] Relator Terri R. Winnon (“Winnon” or “Relator’’) brought suit on behalf of the United States and the State of Texas under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq. (“False Claims Act” or “FCA”), an
Winnon v. Lozanopublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES & STATE OF TEXAS ex rel, TERRI R. WINNON Plaintiffs, RAMIRO LOZANO, et al., ) ) ) ) ) V. ) Civil Case No. 17-2433 (RJL) ) ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDI Mi OPINION (September /$, 2023) [Dkt. #70] Relator Terri R. Winnon (“Winnon” or “Relator”) brought suit on behalf of the United States and the State of Texas under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq. (“False Claims Act” or “FCA”), and
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-03-29 · Published · cited 20× · 852 F.3d 910; 102 Fed. R. Serv. 1434; 2017 WL 1160957; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5445
OPINION BEA, Circuit Judge: We seldom run into a “frequent flyer” as “frequent” as appellant. Over his 46-year career as an illegal entrant, he has been ■ deported or removed dozens of times. But what makes him stand out as a “cara dura” 1 is not only that on some of these entries he used the na
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013-08-23 · Published · cited 2× · 728 F.3d 203; 2013 WL 4504648; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17650
OPINION OF THE COURT Petitioner Ramiro Rojas entered the United States as a lawful permanent resident in 2003 when he was 12 years old. Six years later, Rojas pled guilty to possessing drug paraphernalia in violation of Pennsylvania law and was ordered to pay a fine and court costs. The Department of Homeland Security (the “Department”) then initiated removal proceedings against Rojas, contending that he was removable for havi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000-10-31 · Published · cited 35× · 231 F.3d 984; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27267; 2000 WL 1634278
231 F.3d 984 (5th Cir. 2000) Julio Loa-Herrera, Ramiro Cantu-Gracia, Juana Guzman-Ascencio, Efrain Merino, Arturo Lozano-Lopez, Alejandra Gutierrez, Juan Sanchez-Salinas, and Adelita Cantu de Cabrera, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.E.M. Trominski, Immigration and Naturalization Service District Director, Janet Reno, United States Attorney General, and Immigration and Naturalization Service,
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2010-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
<
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2010-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-430-CR JAMES THOMAS KAVANAGH APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2010-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-430-CR JAMES THOMAS KAVANAGH APPELLANT V. <
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-03-06 · Published · cited 0× · 61 F. App'x 690
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 314× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 97 F. App'x 305
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-08-19 · Published · cited 26× · 770 F.3d 1300; 23 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 365; 2014 WL 4068351; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15917
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys
People v. Manriquezpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2005-12-05 · Published · cited 567× · 123 P.3d 614; 36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 340; 37 Cal. 4th 547; 2005 Daily Journal DAR 13900; 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10176; 2005 Cal. LEXIS 13664
36 Cal.Rptr.3d 340 (2005) 37 Cal.4th 547 123 P.3d 614 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Abelino MANRIQUEZ, Defendant and Appellant. No. S038073. Supreme Court of California December 5, 2005. *346 Lynne S. Coffin and Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defenders, under appointment
Garza v. Thalerpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2012-12-18 · Published · cited 2× · 909 F. Supp. 2d 578; 2012 WL 6604582; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181619
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ORLANDO L. GARCIA, District Judge. Petitioner Manuel Garza,- Jr., filed this federal habeas corpus action pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 challenging his October, 2002 Bexar County conviction for capital murder and sentence of death. For the reasons set forth hereinafter, petitioner is entitled to neither federal habeas corpus relief nor a Certificate of Ap
Gutierrez v. Dretkepublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2005-09-27 · Published · cited 13× · 392 F. Supp. 2d 802; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32496; 2005 WL 2621970
392 F.Supp.2d 802 (2005) Vincent GUTIERREZ, TDCJ No. 999262, Petitioner, v. Douglas DRETKE, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. No. CIV. SA-01-CA-1033FB. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. September 27, 2005. *803
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 12× · 899 F.3d 567
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Employees of Conagra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, (ConAgra) appeal the dismissal of their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. , and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Ark. Code § 11-4-201, et seq. , arguing that factual disputes preclude summary j