Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Letter from Willis J. Yazzie, Sr. to Judge James 0. Browning, sent June 7, 2013, filed June 10, 2013 (Doc. 113)(“Mo-tion to Reconsider”); (ii) the Defendant’s Motion to Withdraw Plea of Guilty, filed November 29, 2011 (Doc. 59)(“lst Motion”); and (iii) the Defendant’s Motion to With

*1282 OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: In this consolidated opinion we consider claims by Shonnie Shidale George and Timothy Yazzie, both of whom were on trial for sexual abuse with children, that their Sixth Amendment rights to a public trial were violated when the district court

791 F.Supp.2d 1093 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Willis YAZZIE, Defendant. No. CR 10-1761 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. June 7, 2011. *1094 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, Jennifer M. Rozzoni, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. James C. Loonam,

OPINION OWENS, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Vincent Yazzie, several tribal conservation organizations, and certain *965 non-profit environmental organizations (collectively “petitioners”) 1 seek final review of the Un

BRISCOE, J., concurring. I agree with the majority that we must affirm the judgment of the district court. I write separately, however, because I disagree with the majority’s analysis of Mr. Yazzie’s claim that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1(b)(3)(A) on the basis of judicially-found facts. In my view, the record in this case est

MEMORANDUM ** John H. Yazzie appeals his sentence of five months and one day imposed following his guilty plea to interstate transportation of stolen property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. Yazzie contends that we have jurisdiction to review the district court’s denial of a downward departure because the district court judge applied an incorrect definition of aberrant behavior and relied on improper fa

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM** Defendant-Appellant Aaron Yazzie was convicted of first degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1151 and 1153 (committed within Indian country). He was sentenced to life imprisonment and now appeals the district court’s denial of a motion for new counsel, the admission of evidence of prior bad acts, and admission of hearsay statements. Appellant argues that the district

VIGIL, Justice. *185 I. INTRODUCTION {1} With this opinion we revisit the circumstances under which an officer may make a warrantless entry into a home under the emergency assistance doctrine. 1 </

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. Raymond Jones and Alfred Yazzie challenge their convictions for second-degree murder and aiding and abetting second-degree murder. We have consolidated the appeals for the purpose of this disposition. Because there was evidence permitting a jury to reasonably conclude the victim was killed by “the commission of an unlawful act not amounting to

MEMORANDUM1 William Yazzie appeals his convictions on three counts of abusive sexual contact in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2244(a)(1) and (a)(3), and one count of sexual abuse of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2243(a). We affirm. Yazzie lived on the Navajo Indian Reservation in Arizona with his extended family. Trisha James, Yazzie’s niece, and Jovonna Yazzie, Yazzie’s granddaughter

JUDGMENT AND ORDER Judge Lorene Ferguson presiding. This is a personal injury case in which negligence is alleged by the Plaintiff. The matter was heard on August 04, 1995. This Court’s findings are as follows: 1. Verianne Yazzie, Defendant, on the night of August 13, 1993, drove to Gallup, New Mexico with two of her sisters and the activities conducted in Gallup, New Mexico consisted pri

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge {1} On appeal, Defendant challenges the district court's imposition of a habitual offender enhancement to his sentence following a violation of his probation. Defendant raises two issues on appeal. First, Defendant argues that he was not subject to enhancement at the time of the probation violation because he had completed his sentence as to that particular conv