Cases

R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' MEMORANDUM OPINION In the 19th century, American drinking establishments began offering free lunches to their patrons. Of course, the practice was designed to attract drinking customers, who, while they didn’t pay for lunch, surely paid- for their beer. This led a wiser consumer to observe that “there ain’t no such

OPINION OF THE COURT Barbara Jaffe, J. Petitioner brings this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 and under the common law for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of Hercules and Leo, two chimpanzees now in the custody of respondent State University of New York at Stony Brook (University). It seeks an order directing respondents to demonstrate the basis for detaining Hercules and Leo, and an order directin

PER CURIAM. American Airlines, Inc. appeals from orders appointing a personal representative, granting a motion to dismiss its petition to determine beneficiaries and denying its motion for summary judgment. We affirm. Gilberto Restrepo, a Colombian national, died in an American airplane accident-on December 20,1995. The decedent’s widow was appointed personal representative of the decedent’s estate by th

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Anthony Pacchia (the “Lead Plaintiff’) and his attorneys (“Lead Counsel”) challenged a transaction in which Vivendi S.A. divested its controlling equity position in Activision Blizzard,. Inc. (“Activision” or the “Company”). The transaction restructured Activision’s governance profile and stockholder base, so this decisio

OPINION Justice NIGRO. This Court granted allowance of appeal to consider whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that under the circumstances of this intestate succession case, maternity by estoppel can be asserted against a third party. For the following reasons, we reverse. The family saga giving rise to this dispute began with William Bahl (“William Sr.”) and his w

ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge. In February, 2009, on behalf of Kyle Thomas Brennan, her deceased son, Victoria L. Britton sued (Docs. 1 and 215) the Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc.; Gerald and Denise Gentile; and Thomas Brennan, Kyle’s father. On September 8, 2010, the defendants jointly moved (Doc. 118) for summary judgment. The plaintiff opposes (Docs. 143

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. ) Consolidated STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 8885-VCL OPINION Date Submitted: March 4, 2015 Date Decided: May 20, 2015 Date Revised: May 21, 2015 Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, FRIEDLANDER & GORRIS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Jessica Zeld

NUMBER 13-09-00067-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CITY OF MCALLEN, TEXAS, Appellant, v. ARNALDO RAMIREZ Jr., RAUL ROMERO, PROMOTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., NOLANA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. Appellees.

559 F.Supp.2d 85 (2008) JAY CASHMAN, INC., Plaintiff, v. PORTLAND PIPE LINE CORP., Defendant. Civil No. 07-93-P-H. United States District Court, D. Maine. June 18, 2008. *86 Martha C. Gaythwaite, Elissa A. Tisdahl, Friedman, Gaythwaite, Wolf & Leavitt, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff. *87

259 F.Supp.2d 1213 (2003) Amy NICHOLS Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. ASSOCIATES' HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN; and Administrative Committee of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates Health and Welfare Plan Defendants. No. 2:00-CV-00010 PGC. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. February 26, 2003. Order Altering Judgment in Part, March 26, 2003.

2 F.Supp.2d 1150 (1998) Nick SCHIMPF, Helen Schimpf, Frank Schimpf, Bonnie Schimpf, Alfred Schimpf, Edith Schimpf, Ernest Schimpf, Christine Schimpf, Helga Schimpf-Heizmann, John Heizmann, S & R Egg Farm, Inc., Frank Schwarzmann and Eve Schwarzmann, Plaintiffs, v. GERALD, INC. and Edward Keiser, Defendants. No. 97-C-545. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. April 2

ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

966 F.Supp. 354 (1997) Michael BYARD, Plaintiff, v. QUALMED PLANS FOR HEALTH, INC., f/k/a Greater Atlantic Health Service, Inc., QualMed Plans for Health of PA, Inc., f/k/a Greater Atlantic Health Service, Inc., and Greater Atlantic Health Service, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-8338. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 29, 1997.

55 So.3d 120 (2010) Robert Michael ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIX C PROPERTIES, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant. No. 45,682-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. November 3, 2010. *122 Martin Law Firm by Dale P. Martin, Broussard, Louisiana, for Appellant. Kelly & Townsend, LLC by T. Taylor Townsend, Natchi

Rel: June 14, 2024 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 2

OPINION PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Luis Osvaldo Torres Pimental appeals his conviction following a conditional guilty plea to one count of importation of over fifty kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 and 18 U.S.C. *1097 § 2. Torres Pimental e

OPINION CONNOLLY, Judge Appellant was convicted of two counts of financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult. He challenges his conviction and the denial of his motion for a new trial, arguing that the jury’s verdicts were inconsistent. He also challenges the district court’s order that he pay restitution to the vulnerable adult’s conservator, arguing that conservators are not among the entities identified

142 Nev.. Advanre Opinion • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF No. 89422 WILLIAM F. ULVANG. JAMIE LIPSON, Appellant, FILED vs. ROBERT GETTO, PUBLIC MAR 1 2 2026 ADMINISTRATOR FOR LYON BRO

Syllabus by the Court 1. "The trial court, in appraising the sufficiency of a complaint on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, should not dismiss the complaint unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." Syllabus Point 3, Chapman v. Kane Transfer Co., Inc. , 160 W. Va. 530 , 236 S.E.2d 207

[Cite as In re Estate of Harrison, 2012-Ohio-2169.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) IN RE: ESTATE OF JORENE HARRISON C.A. No. 25812 APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE