Cases

*1408Opinion IRION, J. —The question on this appeal from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer was sustained without leave to amend is whether, under Government Code section 996.4 or Labor Code section 2802, an employee of a public agency who is hired into a different position within the agency has a right to reimbursement from the agency for attor

WESLEY, Circuit Judge. Milton Rivera was injured cleaning the oil tank of a barge moored in New York Harbor. Soon thereafter, defendant-ap-pellee Clean Water of New York, Inc., which had subcontracted the work to Rivera’s employer, found itself involved in a negligence action in a New York State court. See Folksamerica Reinsurance Co. v. Clean Water of New York, Inc.,

Opinion BENKE, Acting P. J. —In this case, defendant and appellant John Paul Riddles pled guilty to one count of workers’ compensation insurance fraud in violation of Insurance Code 1 section 11760, subdivision (a). His conviction grew out of his application for workers’ compensation insurance, whic

HALLER, J. *1111Under a California law known as the California WARN Act, employers must provide 60 days' notice to affected employees before ordering a "mass layoff." ( Lab. Code, § 1400 et seq. )1 A labor union and several employees sued an employer, alleging the employer violated this law by failing to provide

MANION, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. While joining most of the court’s opinion, I write separately to address the four layoffs that were unrelated to animus and *882to highlight the need for back-pay mitigation. When the dealership laid off Juan Cazorla, Larry Puzon, David

Filed 10/29/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO BRANDON OLSON, Plaintiff and Respondent, A156322 v. LYFT, INC., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. Defendant and Appellant.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KIDS AND TEENS PEDIATRICS : OF DOVER, : : Employer-Below/Appellant, : C.A. No. K19A-08-001 JJC : In and for Kent County v. : : MARIE O’BRIEN, : & UNEM

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: In 2004 in the District of New Jersey, Charles Murray pleaded guilty to traveling interstate to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor. Later that same year, in a separate case in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, he pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography. For these offenses, he was sentence

Opinion MlcINTYRE, J. California allows a person erroneously convicted of a crime to file a claim for indemnity with the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (the Board) for pecuniary injury sustained through the erroneous conviction and imprisonment or incarceration. (Pen. Code, § 4900 et seq.; undesignated statutory references are t

OPINION FARIS, Bankruptcy Judge: INTRODUCTION Debtor Nancy Adinolfi appeals from the bankruptcy court’s order denying the confirmation of her chapter 131 plan. A chapter 13 debtor.,.whose, income exceeds the applicable median must devote all of her “projected disposable income” to the payment of her unsecured creditors. The statute excludes “benefits received und

Filed 8/31/15 (reposted to provide correct version of opinion) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA JESICA SANDRA HOLMES, D066716 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. N

Filed 9/28/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA MARCO ANTONIO ATEMPA et al., D069001 Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2013-00058208- CU-OE-CTL) PAOLO PEDRAZZANI,

IRION, J. Labor Code section 558, 1 subdivision (a) provides that an employer "or other person acting on behalf of an employer" who violates or causes a violation of the state's applicable overtime laws shall be subject to a civil penalty. Similarly, section 1197.1, subdivision (a) provides that an employer "or other person acting either individually or as an officer, agent, or employee of another person" who pays or causes to pay a

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-589 No. COA21-654 Filed 6 September 2022 Wake County, No. 20 CVS 12925 COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, d/b/a CCA NORTH CAROLINA; BRUCE C. ABBOTT; CHARLES P. ADAMS, JR.; CONSTANTINE A. ARETAKIS, II; FREDERICK L. BERRY; ANDREW R. BOYD; HARRY T. BRANCH; TROY D. BRANHAM; RUPERT D. BROWN; JUDITH C. BULLOCK; WILLIAM L. BYRD, JR.; JOHNNY L. CA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-589 No. COA21-654 Filed 6 September 2022 Wake County, No. 20 CVS 12925 COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, d/b/a CCA NORTH CAROLINA; BRUCE C. ABBOTT; CHARLES P. ADAMS, JR.; CONSTANTINE A. ARETAKIS, II; FREDERICK L. BERRY; ANDREW R. BOYD; HARRY T. BRANCH; TROY D. BRANHAM; RUPERT D. BROWN; JUDITH C. BULLOCK; WILLIAM L. BYRD, JR.; JOHNNY L. CA

DATO, J. *561Plaintiff Jesus Cuitlahuac Garcia filed a wage and hour lawsuit against Border Transportation Group, LLC (BTG), its owner Erik Ortega, and BTG employee Martha Ortega. Some of Garcia's claims are based on Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) wage orders;1 others are not. The trial court granted defendants

ORDER Donald Hill, Jr., an Ohio resident proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing his employment case. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Seeking monetary, declaratory, and injunctive relief, Hill sued CM Products

Filed 11/13/18 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA JESUS CUITLAHUAC GARCIA, D072521 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. ECU08922) v. ORD

Chin, J. *951 In previous decisions, this court has said that the statutory remedies available for a violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA; Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq. ), the unfair competition law (UCL; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq. ), and the false advertising law (

MOYLAN, J. On October 9, 2003, the Prince George’s County Planning Board of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (“the Planning Board”) approved a Preliminary Plan of Subdivision for an 86-lot cluster subdivision, along with a variation from the Subdivision Regulations regarding wetlands.1 The applicant and developer was Cherrywood Development, LLC, one of the appellees in thi