Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
18 opinions for “United Computer v. Daidone”
United States v. Cainpublic domain
671 F.3d 271 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David CAIN, Jr., Chris Cain, Jamie Soha, Defendants-Appellants, Patrick Ackroyd, Defendant.[*] Nos. 09-0707-cr (L), 09-2643-CR (CON), 10-0240(CON). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: October 11, 2011. Decided: January 31, 2012.
United States v. Binghampublic domain
653 F.3d 983 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. T.D. BINGHAM, aka Seal B; Bull; Tyler Davis Bingham; The Hulk, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar Wesley Hevle, aka Seal R; Snail, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 06-50668, 06-50669. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 2011
United States v. Milanpublic domain
Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-3-2002 USA v. Milan Precedential or Non-Precedential:
United States v. Milton Milanpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. This case comes on before this court on appeal from a final judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the district court following defendant-appehant Milton Milan’s conviction by a jury on 14 counts of mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and related criminal conspiracies in part for his activities undertaken while in public office. The district cou
State v. Shortpublic domain
129 Ohio St.3d 360 (2011) 2011-Ohio-3641 952 N.E.2d 1121 THE STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, v. SHORT, Appellant. No. 2006-1366. Supreme Court of Ohio. Submitted April 5, 2011. Decided July 28, 2011. Mathias J. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J. Ingram, Robert C. Deschler, and Leo
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Bennie Anderson (A-15/16-20) (084365) Argued March 30, 2021 -- Decided August 11, 2021 LaVECCHIA, J., writing for the Court. In this appeal,
Tymoshenko v. Firtashpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge: The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) in this action alleges that several Ukrainian defendants, led by businessman Dmytro Firtash, financed a domestic racketeering enterprise (the “U.S. Enterprise”) conducted primarily by defendant United States citizens and corporations. Plaintiff Yulia Tymoshenko is the former Prime Minister of Ukraine and a longstand
Jen Electric, Inc. v. County of Essexpublic domain
949 A.2d 861 (2008) 401 N.J. Super. 203 JEN ELECTRIC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ESSEX, Defendant-Respondent. No. A-3957-07T1 Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 3, 2008. Decided June 24, 2008. *863 Suzanne M. Cerra argued the cause for appellant (Nuk
B.D. PARKER, JR., Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Operating Local 649 Annuity Trust Fund (“Local 649”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Pauley, J.) dismissing claims alleging securities fraud in violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, and breaches of fiduciary duty in violation
Reich v. Lopezpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiffs Otto J. Reich, a former ambassador to Venezuela, and his consulting company, Otto Reich Associates, LLC (“ORA”), allege that the activities of the defendants caused injury to their property and reputation. Plaintiffs bring claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c-d) (“RICO”), as well as c
State v. Shortpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Short, 129 Ohio St.3d 360, 2011-Ohio-3641.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SHORT, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Short, 129 Ohio St.3d 360, 2011-Ohio-3641.] Criminal law — Aggravated murder — Death penalty upheld. (No. 2006-1366 — Submitted April 5, 2011 — Decided July 28, 2011.) APPEAL from the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, No. 2004 CR 02635. ___________
Daou v. Early Advantage, LLCpublic domain
410 F.Supp.2d 82 (2006) Antony DAOU, Plaintiff, v. EARLY ADVANTAGE, LLC, Defendant. No. 1:05-CV-0620 LEK/DRH. United States District Court, N.D. New York. January 6, 2006. *83 *84 *85 Eve I. Klein, Duane, Morris Law Firm, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.
Jennis v. Roodpublic domain
488 F.Supp.2d 172 (2007) Frederick Joseph JENNIS, Plaintiff, v. Duane ROOD, et al., Defendants. No. 5:03-CV-0772 (LEK/GHL). United States District Court, N.D. New York. January 16, 2007. *173 *174 Frederick Joseph Jennis, Syracuse, NY, Pro Se. Jeffrey P. Reisner, City of Syracuse Law De
407 F.Supp.2d 1304 (2005) COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. WILSHIRE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, National Commodities Corporation, Inc., Andrew Alan Wilshire, Eric Scott Malcolmson and James Joseph Russo, Defendants. No. 04-80862-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. December 5, 2005. *1305
City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits. Com, Inc.public domain
Judge WINTER dissents in part and concurs in part in a separate opinion. STRAUB, Circuit Judge: In these four consolidated cases, the Plaintiff-Appellant City of New York (“City”) appeals from the judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Deborah A. Batts, Judge), dismissing its civil claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U
In re Smith Barney Transfer Agent Litigationpublic domain
*156 MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge. In the Eclogues, Virgil observed that “time bears away all things, even our minds.” As this Memorandum & Order illustrates, Virgil’s maxim applies to legal theories as well. Plaintiffs in this putative class action assert claims against Defendants Smit
Tenore v. Nu Car Carriers, Inc.public domain
67 N.J. 466 (1975) 341 A.2d 613 CATHERINE TENORE, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. NU CAR CARRIERS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued on January 6, 1975. Argued on January 7, 1975. Decided June 18, 1975. *470 Mr. Myron J. Bromberg argued the
Erceg v. Fairbanks Exploration Co.public domain
95 F.2d 850 (1938) ERCEG v. FAIRBANKS EXPLORATION CO. No. 8107. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 30, 1938. *851 Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal. (Alfred Sutro, Francis N. Marshall, and Francis R. Kirkham, all of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for Fairbanks Exploration Co. John L. McGi