Cases

219 B.R. 867 (1998) In re Carrol G. VARNER, Debtor. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., Appellant, v. Carrol G. VARNER, and United States Trustee, Appellees. BAP No. NC-97-1640-RRYN, Bankruptcy No. 96-13117, Adversary No. 97-1076. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 18, 1998. Decided March 31, 1998.

ORDER CATHARINE R. ARON, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE THIS MATTER came on for hearing on April 1, 2015, in Winston-Salem, North Carolina upon the objection by the Chapter 13 Trustee (the “Trustee”) to confirmation of the plan. Thomas Anderson appeared on behalf of Don and Patti Varner (the “Debtors”), and Kathryn Bringle appeared on behalf of the Trustee. After considering the documents on the r

PER CURIAM. Paul Ray Varner, Jr. (hereinafter “Ml'. Varner”) appeals his convictions for first degree murder without a recommendation of mercy and burglary in the Circuit Court of Wood County, West Virginia. Mr. Vamer raises a number of issues. However, after reviewing the briefs, examining pertinent authorities and hearing the arguments of counsel, we find his claim that he was denied trial by a fair and impartial jury to b

990 P.2d 357 (1999) 164 Or. App. 66 Ellen VARNER, Appellant, v. S. David EVES, Respondent. (16-97-01268; CA A102273) Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted June 14, 1999. Decided November 3, 1999. *359 Megan L. Harris argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs were Ma

ORDER RICH, Circuit Judge. Iso Nahnken of Nett Salvador Iriarte moves for reconsideration of the court’s April 7, 1997 order that dismissed Iso Nahnken’s petition for certification. The United States submits a response. I. BACKGROUND In 1994, Iso Nahnken filed a complaint for damages in the Supreme Court of the Federated States of

126 F.3d 1433 Iso NAHNKEN of Nett Salvador Iriarte, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES of America, Ruby Etscheit, Renee EtscheitVarner, Yvette Etscheit Adams, and Pohnpei PublicLands Board of Trustees, Respondents. Misc. No. 495. United States Court of Appeals,Federal Circuit. Sept. 18, 1997. Joseph Gabriel Di

Mann, J. ¶1 In 2009, Frank Bucci defaulted on a $1.53 million promissory note secured by a deed of trust on his home. In 2013, U.S. Bank National Association as trustee *321 (USB), the current beneficiary and holder of Bucci’s promissory note, initiated nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings. Bucci respon

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. [1] This appeal concerns the confluence of two recent, significant Supreme Court decisions, City of Boerne v. Flores, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 2157, 138 L.Ed.2d 624 (1997), and Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996). The plaintiffs represent a class comprised of all tenured or tenure

OPINION WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Robert and Virginia Varner appeal a $10,-000 judgment entered against them by the district court in this action brought by Raymond A. Yancey, trustee of the bankruptcy estate of debtor Pucci Shoes, Incorporated (Pucci), to set aside a transfer from Pucci to the Varners pursuant to 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 547(b), 549(a) (West 1993). The district

452 So.2d 622 (1984) Charles J. PFEIFER and Charles Fitzpatrick, As Personal Representatives of the Estate of Suzanne Harvison, Appellants, v. Marjorie VARNER, Appellee. No. 83-2419. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 5, 1984. Rehearing Denied July 13, 1984. As Amended September 19, 1984. Richard H.W. Maloy, C

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This case is before us for a second time — but with the parties’ roles reversed. In its first iteration, a panel of this court set aside the district court’s entry of judgment n.o.v. for the defendants and reinstated guilty verdicts returned by the jury. See United States v. Moran, 312 F.3d 480 (1st Cir.2002) (Moran I). T

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 00-2097 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. JOHN MORAN and NORA MORAN, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge]

OPINION EN BANC LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Albert Kenrick and Derek Ober appeal from judgments of conviction entered after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. *22 The jury found Kenrick guilty of one count of bank fraud and Ober guilty

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. WALD, Circuit Judge: Navegar, Inc., doing business as Intra-tec (“Intratec”), and Penn Arms, Inc. (“Penn Arms”) (together “appellants”), are licensed by the United States Bureau of Acohol, Tobacco and Firearms (“BATF”) to manufacture firearms. Intratec and Penn Arms brought a declaratory judgment action under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 in the United States District

192 F.3d 1050 (D.C. Cir. 1999) Navegar, Incorporated, d/b/a Intratec, and Penn Arms, Incorporated, Appellantsv.United States of America, Appellee No. 98-5491 United States Court of AppealsFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 10, 1999Decided October 8, 1999 Appeal from the United States Dis

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00102-CV __________________ THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE CWABS, INC., ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-1,

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00102-CV __________________ THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE CWABS, INC., ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-1

GREENBERG, Senior Circuit Judge. This case comes on before this court on appeal from a July 13, 2000 memorandum and order of the district court entering a judgment of acquittal for defendants-ap-pellees John Moran and Nora Moran after their jury convictions for bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 371. Granting appel-lees’ Fed.R.Crim.P. 29 mot

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge MICHAEL joined. OPINION WIDENER, Circuit Judge: Defendants, Arnold and Naomi Meyer, appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff, Harry Shaia, Jr. (trustee), in a bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §

*153Justice Brennan announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion in which Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Powell join. The question we must decide is whether relief awarded in this case, in the form of a one-black-for-one-white promotion requirement to be applied as an interim measure to state trooper promotions in the Alab